Skip to comments.
Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-4)
Senate Judiciary ^
| 1-12-06
| Senate Judiciary
Posted on 01/12/2006 5:14:27 AM PST by OXENinFLA
Day 4: Hearing Resumes
This morning, Senators will question Judge Alito during a third round. They will then go into a closed session, to review the FBI background investigation on the Supreme Court nominee. Outside witnesses may be called to testify this afternoon, as well as the American Bar Association, to discuss its recommendations.
THURS., 9:00AM ET, C-SPAN
Live Links
C-span
Judiciary LIVE LINK
FEDNET
CapitolHearings.org
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoakbar; alitohearings; alitorulz; babykilling; bidenisamoron; bush2rats0; clangingcymbals; demsareduds; emptybarrels; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superdeduper; superduper; superduperduper; welldecided
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 3,401-3,406 next last
To: OldFriend
He [Alito] would have been the best Chief Justice. Alito will have nearly the same judicial power as an associate, and he doesn't have to deal with the same administrative oversight burden (of other courts, not SCOTUS) that the CJ does. I rather like that things shook out the way they did, including the trip down Miers Lane.
181
posted on
01/12/2006 6:23:20 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: ilovew
Maybe Patrick should go back and sit under his tree in Vermont until he figures it out.
182
posted on
01/12/2006 6:23:40 AM PST
by
defconw
( Allen/Pence 2008 Operation Put Up or Shut Up)
To: Seattle Conservative
This is still open.
I was going to ask him if it is proper for a man who killed someone with his car due to negligence to be a U.S. Senator. But, I am at work and don't want to be associated with his site from here. Maybe tonight.
*****
I thought maybe a few night owls would be interested in this.
What Would You Ask Samuel Alito?
President Bush's nominee already knows the answers to questions the White House coaches and handlers anticipated, but he hasn't heard from you -- yet.
As he makes his case to serve on the nation's Supreme Court, what is the most important question you think Samuel Alito should answer?
http://www.tedkennedy.com/page/s/askalito
183
posted on
01/12/2006 6:24:02 AM PST
by
Gvl_M3
To: defconw
Having nothing, Leahy sounds ridiculous fishing for an issue.
184
posted on
01/12/2006 6:24:04 AM PST
by
drc43
(Judges... Judges... get it done, then we can discuss priorities)
To: A Citizen Reporter
He still sends tax dollars to the King of England for his Celestial Seasonings.
To: CharlesWayneCT
I said this last night. We women are tigers protecting our families when they are attacked, and we get good and mad. But then when kindness is displayed, we often break down. It's the kindness that undoes us after days of attacks.
186
posted on
01/12/2006 6:24:09 AM PST
by
Peach
To: Chuck54
LOL!
"Sc*ew the giant swells! I'm sure there's fish here somewhere! Onward men!"
187
posted on
01/12/2006 6:24:09 AM PST
by
small voice in the wilderness
(The Culture of Corruption hurts. But it's the dems. Corruption of Culture that destroys.)
To: maggief
Leahy is senile..or close to it..nearly incoherent..and his questioning, er, rambling..is pathetic. I predict that after Alito is confirmed by the Senate, you will hear lots of talk on the left to get rid of him as the ranking member..
188
posted on
01/12/2006 6:24:47 AM PST
by
ken5050
(Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
To: small voice in the wilderness
Novak on FNC just referred to the hearing as an auto-da-fe.
Good analogy.
189
posted on
01/12/2006 6:24:55 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: All
has Leahy actually asked a question yet?
To: mystery-ak
It is, but ya's never know.
To: chris1
Actually, I prefer Alito to Roberts so far from what I can tell. Me too. Roberts is showing tendencies, through his questions in oral arguement, that indicate he is not as strong a supporter of states rights as Rehnquist.
192
posted on
01/12/2006 6:25:28 AM PST
by
Founding Father
(The War Against Western Civilization Has Begun)
To: Preachin'
What does a cat actually do with a mouse when he catches it? Mine, because they really love me, will leave it somewhere in the path I take on the way to the coffee maker in the morning so that I'm sure to discover it in the darkness and my half awaken state. They love the scream it brings out of me, followed by my knees going weak and nearly bringing me to the floor.
To: Mayflower Sister
194
posted on
01/12/2006 6:25:49 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Gvl_M3
What, has Teddy run out of questions?
I think we should all send our questions for the senator there. Including his association with a certain OWL club at Harvard.
To: drc43
196
posted on
01/12/2006 6:26:15 AM PST
by
defconw
( Allen/Pence 2008 Operation Put Up or Shut Up)
To: chris1
Actually, I prefer Alito to Roberts so far from what I can tell. Two days ago on FNC, Mort Kondrake called Alito home run #2 for Bush picks for SCOTUS.
197
posted on
01/12/2006 6:26:25 AM PST
by
Chuck54
( "Happy people need no particular cause to be happy.")
To: newnhdad
has Leahy actually asked a question yet? Not sure .. I'm still trying to figure out what he's saying
198
posted on
01/12/2006 6:26:33 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: saveliberty
A few freepers reported that in the later hours, a CNN reporter was saying it was Graham who made Mrs. Alito cry and she wouldn't return until he apologized. I think the reporter was Anderson Cooper.
199
posted on
01/12/2006 6:26:58 AM PST
by
Peach
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Without Liberal judicial activism they have no use for the SCOTUS. The Supreme Court is merely a tool for them to force the Liberal agenda on the American public.
They don't understand or want to understand the true nature of the Supreme Court. A strict interpretation of the Constitution leaves no room for reading what isn't there to promote a Liberal cause. IMHO
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 3,401-3,406 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson