Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The calm judge and the angry senator (No spin)
The Washington Times ^ | 01-12-06 | Editorial

Posted on 01/11/2006 10:06:02 PM PST by smoothsailing

The calm judge and the angry senator

Published January 12, 2006

It was a stunt, and it failed in ways that prove how Senate Democrats have tossed reason out the window when it comes to Judge Samuel Alito. When the facts don't support you, get dramatic.    

 Around noon yesterday, during what were until then smooth and uneventful hearings, an angry Sen. Ted Kennedy demanded that 30-year-old documents about the now-defunct Concerned Alumni of Princeton, or CAP, be entered in the record. Would Republicans try to keep the documents from view? Would the documents reveal damning facts about Judge Alito? On both accounts, the answer was no.    

 After lunch, Sen. Arlen Specter, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, sent aides to retrieve the documents -- the private papers of longtime National Review publisher and onetime Concerned Alumni of Princeton leader William Rusher -- which are housed in the Library of Congress. The documents -- internal correspondence, magazines, minutes of meetings and other items -- would show whether Judge Alito was an active member of a group which, over the years, counted among its members at least a few people who made racist or sexist statements in CAP's publication, Prospect.     

The answer was no. Seven weeks ago, New York Times reporter David Kirkpatrick found that the documents contain little or nothing about Judge Alito. The judge was not "among the group's major donors," Mr. Kirkpatrick found. "He was not an active leader of the group, and two of his classmates who were involved and Mr. Rusher said they did not remember his playing a role." Another member appeared on Fox News to confirm that. To judge by Mr. Kennedy's fiery accusations, though, he is bargaining that most viewers haven't read the article.    

 Why even talk about all this? The only...

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearings; senaterats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: Kryptonite

for the first time, the GOP looked like they had their act together


41 posted on 01/11/2006 11:14:44 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bybybill; Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
Poor old Ted, have a drink, calm down, have a drink, don`t worry,have a drink, you will still be in the Senate, no matter how stupid you are so have a drink Ted.
42 posted on 01/11/2006 11:15:16 PM PST by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Not sure about Cornyn and Durbin...could have missed it...but Colburn pointed out Durbin's 180 on abortion.


43 posted on 01/11/2006 11:17:26 PM PST by Carolinamom (If you pursue happiness, you'll never find it. ---C.P. Snow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Makes this tightwad want to open up his checkbook!


44 posted on 01/11/2006 11:19:38 PM PST by Kryptonite (McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, DeWine, Chafee - put them in your sights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"The credibility gap that existed before the hearing has become a credibility chasm," People for the American Way head Ralph Neas said outside the hearing room.

Unfortunately for Ralph Neas, the "People for the American Way" (a far left liberal group) doesn't actually get a vote during the confirmation hearings, so his opinion counts for exactly diddley squat.

45 posted on 01/11/2006 11:19:52 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Cornyn listed faults in both women? Wow! Wouldn't it be fantastic if Ginsburg retired this year? Ohhhh, the dems would be writhing in the aisles if Bush got another opportunity to fill her vacancy!

I'm just now getting to see Hannity & Colmes repeat. (Phone call interrupted earlier...grrr.)


46 posted on 01/11/2006 11:20:38 PM PST by Humidston (Two words: TERM LIMITS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite

mine's been closed for a while, but if they keep this up, you never know...


47 posted on 01/11/2006 11:20:47 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: paul51
WOW!

That would be fantastic! Especially if it was replacing Ginsberg.

If the hearings started at the end of Sept. or the 1st of Oct. the Republicans could probably pick up seats in both chambers.

Particularly if President Bush nominated a minority or better yet, a minority woman!

Janice Rogers Brown!

48 posted on 01/11/2006 11:20:51 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
Yes, he is a very poised and polished man and what a US Senator should be, in my opinion. He was looking appreciatively at Senator Graham yesterday who was asking a rapid list of questions of Alito. Graham, who has been catching a ration of stuff here lately, said as an aside to the judge, "You don't have to listen to this, I'm talking to someone else now."
49 posted on 01/11/2006 11:20:59 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

he sure thinks he does..........all the blogs say he is there in the hallways.


50 posted on 01/11/2006 11:21:49 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Humidston

turn on CSPAN.......it's Graham.


51 posted on 01/11/2006 11:23:01 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

You're killing me here.... I just turned off Zell Miller!!! ;-)


52 posted on 01/11/2006 11:25:33 PM PST by Humidston (Two words: TERM LIMITS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Humidston

clearer: using o'conner (because they idolized her) he compared HER record to alito's......proving they almost think exactly alike, shwoing that o'conner votes with Scalia more than any other judge.

graham read a lot of ginsburg's writings before she was nominated, when she was the attorney for the ACLU -- pointing out that in today's time she would NEVER get on the court and reminding them that the GOP did NOT trash her during her hearing.......it was sweet.

BTW, notice that they have stopped referring to o'conner....LOL.


53 posted on 01/11/2006 11:26:43 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
"Poor old Ted, have a drink, calm down, don`t worry, you will still be in the Senate, no matter how stupid you are."

The big question: how does this arrogant fool get reelected? What forces are keeping Comrade Kennedy in the Senate?

54 posted on 01/11/2006 11:27:00 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paul51
The greatest thing that can happen is another appointment opportunity for Pres Bush just before the next election. Money can't buy the kind of campaign advertising that these hearings provide.

How would you feel about the opportunity if the nominee were Harriet Meirs -- or somebody like her?

This could be turning out a lot differently, methinks. We dodged a bullet...

55 posted on 01/11/2006 11:27:35 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Cornyn up next. Schumer is doing the tap dance now.


56 posted on 01/11/2006 11:27:50 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
When the facts don't support you, get dramatic.

Exactly!

57 posted on 01/11/2006 11:28:17 PM PST by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Darn, I missed Graham. Now it's Schumer, the pompous ass.
58 posted on 01/11/2006 11:29:25 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

this is the part where i was laying on my sofa, imagining myself punching him right in the mouth

(hey, my arm's in a cast -- I had nothing better to do.......LOL)


59 posted on 01/11/2006 11:29:40 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

Schumer: "A response is not an answer." Memo to Schumer: An allegation is not evidence.


60 posted on 01/11/2006 11:29:57 PM PST by Carolinamom (If you pursue happiness, you'll never find it. ---C.P. Snow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson