Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUT ENOUGH ABOUT YOU, JUDGE; LET'S HEAR WHAT I HAVE TO SAY
The New York Times ^ | ELISABETH BUMILLER

Posted on 01/11/2006 5:02:03 AM PST by pjsbro

WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 - The Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. were supposed to be about the judge, but on Tuesday it sometimes seemed as though somebody forgot to tell the senators on the Judiciary Committee.

The lure of 50 cameras and the captive audience in the Senate Hart Office Building appeared too much of a temptation for some of Capitol Hill's windiest lions, who began by promising not to run a marathon session of questions, then did so anyway.

At one point Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, was even granted two extra minutes from the committee's chairman, Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania - drawing groans from colleagues, among them Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York.

The highest ratio of words per panelist to words per nominee was that of Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., Democrat of Delaware, who managed to ask five questions in his 30-minute time allotment.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearings; s; senatedem; windbags
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 01/11/2006 5:02:04 AM PST by pjsbro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

Great title


2 posted on 01/11/2006 5:04:10 AM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

So long as the stories are about the senators, Alito is in great shape -- it shows that the media can't take their claims seriously.


3 posted on 01/11/2006 5:04:31 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

The highest ratio of words per panelist to words per nominee was that of Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., Democrat of Delaware, who managed to ask five questions in his 30-minute time allotment.


4 posted on 01/11/2006 5:04:41 AM PST by pjsbro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert; pjsbro

Wow, the NYT nails the Dems in that title. They must be annoyed that the Dems on committee are not delivering


5 posted on 01/11/2006 5:10:27 AM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

This hearing is not any different than any other when it comes to the questions..After and hour or so of their rants the Dem's get to one question..More than likely it has to do with abortion.They don't care if the Judge OKs the bombing of (if he had the authority) the USA as long as they can keep killing babies..No matter what these morons say or do they will keep getting elected as long as they can make sure the blacks do not have a proper education..


6 posted on 01/11/2006 5:12:35 AM PST by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro
Sub headline: Schumer makes pass at Alito's mother-in-law in open session
7 posted on 01/11/2006 5:12:48 AM PST by thoughtomator (Illegal immigrants come to America for a better life - yours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

She's not the only one who noticed:

Another Hot Air Hearing
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
By Neil Cavuto

They are called hearings. Why? Who's hearing?

I suspect, Judge Alito... and that's it.

He's the one we should be hearing. But he's the one who isn't talking.

Senators are doing the yapping, at a ratio — I clocked, unscientifically today — at about 6-to-1.

That means, six times more bloviating from senators than answering from Judge Alito.

And don't gang up on the Senate Judiciary Committee. That's all committees in Washington.

Every time Alan Greenspan comes up on Capitol Hill for his "hearings," he's the one listening — usually to long-winded politicians grandstanding and meaningless pseudo-intellectual babble, the stupidity of which is, well, stupefying.

And by the way, fair and balanced here, this isn't a Republican issue or Democrat issue — this is an all-senator, all-points-bulletin issue.

They all yap too much and ask too little.

It's insulting to us, it's insulting to Judge Alito and it's insulting to our country.

I'm still waiting for the senator who asks short, to the point questions, because he wants clear, to the point answers. In short: The senator who makes sense, not speeches. Alas, I haven't found him or her.

Hearings? Try... hot airings.


8 posted on 01/11/2006 5:12:57 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro
The highest ratio of words per panelist to words per nominee

Kennedy kept repeating his words.

When Kennedy repeats a word, is that word counted once or counted twice?

9 posted on 01/11/2006 5:13:00 AM PST by syriacus (Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro; Mo1

You know the dems have a PR problem when they are called names by the NYTimes..


10 posted on 01/11/2006 5:14:22 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

ping for later read


11 posted on 01/11/2006 5:18:27 AM PST by TheRobb7 (The American Spirit does not require a federal subsidy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro
At one point Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, was even granted two extra minutes from the committee's chairm

Kennedy given two extra minutes to question Judge A - lee - oh -to!

12 posted on 01/11/2006 5:23:20 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
Wow, the NYT nails the Dems in that title

No wonder Andrea Mitchell mentioned it first (the long questions) on Imus today. The NYT still gives the talking heads their lead.

13 posted on 01/11/2006 5:23:54 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Yeah and Katie Couric cited this article on this morning's Today show in the segment with Begala and Carville, suggesting Dems were in big trouble when the New York Times starts mocking them...


14 posted on 01/11/2006 5:26:58 AM PST by pjsbro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

Dahlia Lithwick of liberal mag Slate accuses Alito of being boring, but she also points out that Alito is so smart and loves his job so much that he goes into such intricate detail that the Dem committee members don't understand his answers.

Read Betsy Newmark's analysis of Dahlia and the twisting libs

http://betsyspage.blogspot.com/2006/01/hmm-ya-think-that-dahlia-lithwick.html


15 posted on 01/11/2006 5:27:14 AM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

Well, the senators do have to ramble on until there are enough words on the table to make a question.

Meanwhilst, the Judge gives a concise, direct, and unassailable answers.

No suprise about the time differentail. The Judge gives a one minute answer off the top of his head to the senator's rambling five minutes of script reading.


16 posted on 01/11/2006 5:35:32 AM PST by CPOSharky (Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. Like demoncrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

Marking for later. Not every day the Dems get trashed by their own. LOL


17 posted on 01/11/2006 5:38:12 AM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

The GOP senators cleverly and correctly, used their time to rebut all the Dems lies from the previous speaker, and when necessary, let Alito expand/clarify his remarks..they chold not be critisized in this instance..


18 posted on 01/11/2006 5:38:32 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Best description I've heard of Schumer, Kennedy and Leahy after day one of questioning is glum, glummer and glummest.


19 posted on 01/11/2006 5:41:05 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pjsbro

These Roman senators are making fools of themselves (again). None of them (not one) has half the skill, experience, and knowledge of Judge Alito (and Judge Roberts). So they make these faces, expressing 'concern' for this 'radical activist' judge. When in fact, these clowns (the senators) are the radical activists!

Schumer, Biden, Graham, Feistein, Kennedy, etc. How embarrassing for us all.


20 posted on 01/11/2006 5:48:27 AM PST by Dr. Ed Bravo (Bye Bye WABC internet stream!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson