Posted on 01/08/2006 12:09:27 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
Despite 9/11 and the almost numbing frequency of suicide bombings in Iraq, Israel, London. Madrid, Istanbul, Bali, and elsewhere, some people continue pedaling two discredited arguments: 1) that blame for these attacks ultimately lies with the policies or mere existence of the victims governments; and 2) that we must listen and can learn something of value from the terrorists themselves.
Most Americans realize that "its not us, its them," in other words, it is the terrorists, not the victims of terrorism, who are to blame. Accordingly, it is the terrorists, not us, who need to change or to be stopped. Yet some persist in arguing that the terrorists have valid complaints against us that somehow make the terrible things that they do comprehensible.
Sadly, even here in Chicago the "us, not them" approach is proving resilient in some quarters. Case in point: one prominent Chicago religious organization and its top professional not only recently met with Hezbollah, but he also asserts that there is something to learn from the group and that he is open to meeting with Hezbollah again.
Hezbollah is a terrorist organization. It has the blood of hundreds of Americans and others on its hands. Its record includes murdering 241 U.S. Marines on a peacekeeping mission in Beirut; hijacking a TWA flight and dumping a murdered American passenger onto the tarmac; bombing both the AMIA Jewish Community Center and the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires, killing 117, Jews and non-Jews alike; and killing 19 U.S. soldiers in Saudi Arabia.
Founded and armed with the help of Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Hezbollah calls for the establishment of an "Islamic Republic" in Lebanon and the destruction of Israel. Hezbollah leaders refer to the U.S. as its "number one enemy"" Hezbollahs spiritual leader has proclaimed that "we in Hezbollah are proud that America, the Great Satan, accuses us of being a terrorist body."
Notwithstanding that deadly record and clarity of purpose, an October trip to the Middle East, co-sponsored by the Chicago Presbyterys Middle East Task Force, included a meeting with Hezbollah. One of the participants on that trip was the Presbyterys top professional, the Rev. Bob Reynolds.
When asked on WBEZ radio who he met with on his Middle East trip, Reynolds didnt mention Hezbollah. Only after some relatively obscure web postings came to the attention of local Jewish groups did he acknowledge it. And then came the backpedaling and rationalizations: it wasnt an official trip, it wasnt supposed to be publicized, Reynolds was on leave, the Middle East Task Force doesnt speak" for the Presbytery (but it is funded by and sponsors trips and resolutions for the Presbytery), etc.
Demonstrating that many Presbyterians recognize how naïve and dangerous such meetings are, when a national Presbyterian group met with Hezbollah last year, the senior staff members responsible for scheduling it were fired.
Naïve? Reynolds says he now regrets the meeting because Hezbollah used it for its own political purposes. But that, among other things, is precisely what Hezbollah and such groups do. Its what Hezbollah did a year earlier when it met with national Presbyterian leaders. Reynolds regrets that particular and predictable aspect of the meetingbut not the equally predictable validation that it gave to the terrorists.
Dangerous? Reynolds indulges in the "we have something to learn" fantasy, defending the meeting with terrorists as an opportunity to listen carefully for how they understand and articulate their own reality." But Reynolds acknowledges that he didnt publicly challenge Hezbollahs "reality" of terrorism, leaving the impression that while he and we have something to learn from Hezbollah he has nothing to say to them.
Indeed, Reynolds stated that he awaits guidelines from the national church that "would help to make clear what the churchs position is with respect to violence." While Reynolds waits to hear church policy on whether violence is good or not, Hezbollah plots its next act of murder and mayhem. In fact, just days after Reynoldss meeting, Hezbollah launched another attack against Israeli civilians. It is in these ways that naïve, dangerous meetings with terrorists are justified, fueling the horribly flawed logic that it is the victims and/or their governments who have antagonized the terrorists. That such utter nonsense holds such traction for otherwise intelligent people is another indication of terrorisms insidious nature.
The controversy over the Hezbollah meeting, which has drawn sharp condemnation from the Chicago City Council and bipartisan groups of congressmen, is unfolding as the Chicago Presbytery considers divesting from companies doing business with the Jewish state, another divisive, tension-provoking step. We recognize that many leaders and members of the Chicago Presbytery mean well. We appreciate that many righteous Presbyterians are taking the difficult path of publicly challenging their own beloved church on these issues. But a troubling pattern, threatening the very foundation of Jewish-Presbyterian relations, is manifesting itself within the Chicago Presbytery.
As Americans we cannot countenance embracing killers of Americans who proclaim that we are their number one enemy." As Jews we cannot countenance indulging those who, supported by Iran as Hezbollah is, are committed to destroying the only Jewish state in 2,000 years. And as historic partners with the Chicago Presbytery in so many noble causes, we cannot countenance any relationship with an institution that embraces and indulges terrorists and contemplates a form of economic warfare against the Jewish state.
Steven B. Nasatir is president of the Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago.
Note the following in this report: "When asked on WBEZ radio who he met with on his Middle East trip, Reynolds didnt mention Hezbollah. Only after some relatively obscure web postings came to the attention of local Jewish groups did he acknowledge it. And then came the backpedaling and rationalizations: it wasnt an official trip, it wasnt supposed to be publicized, Reynolds was on leave, the Middle East Task Force doesnt speak" for the Presbytery (but it is funded by and sponsors trips and resolutions for the Presbytery), etc."
Still can't look my local presbyterian minister in the eye...
HA....We have a GREAT Presbyterian minister (PCAmerica)....today he quoted Mark Steyn in his sermon, and cited C. S. Lewis, and Narnia.....the Sermon was about the RESURRECTION and atheists, basically. It was great!
Well, you don't live in Sodom On The Subway.
Quick, someone tell Abe Foxman the Presbyterians are not the "conservative" Christians who keep beating his pants off every election. Abe's friends are his enemies and his enemies are his friends. Poor Abe; he might be suffering from PatRobertsonitis.
Why would you have to? If you're attending a Presbyterian Church USA, STOP!!! Save yourself the agony. We left the apostate ELCA years ago and are totally liberated.
---------------------------
Grandma, I did the same. I will not go back untill they get this mess fixed.The PCUSA has gotten too liberal for me.
Here in Oregon, next door to the foiled terrorist training camp, the Presbyterian minister is also the Episcopal priest and the new local prison chaplin is a budhist. You figure why this nation has problems.
Pope discusses Christian unity with Presbyterians
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1553831/posts
"Palestine is the wrong name for their State. It should be called Anarchy."FReeper sgtbono2002
"Then let's wait and see what the Arabs do after they take Gaza. There's nothing like Arab reality to break up a Jewish fantasy."FReeper Noachian
A student told his professor he was going to "Palestine" to "fight for freedom, peace and justice,"Orwellian leftist code words that mean "murder Jews."
The Nature Of Bruce ~
You are correct about them rushing to assure the terrorists they'd voted for sKerry. And this is but one of a handful of meetings the church has had with terrorists, one being a seminary group full of college aged kids.
The PCUSA is losing members in droves. Liberal agenda and arrogance at the denominational level abounds.
You are correct. When MEMRI found the quotes in a mid east newspaper, it stated the Presbyterian group were all Democrats and all 18 of them had voted for Kerry.
So much for an "unbiased" fact finding trip to the mid east!!!!
I heard from my pastor that a lot of conflict is going on at the national level of the PCUSA. If someone stands up at a national session meeting and quotes the Bible as a basis for their arguments, other members of the Presbytery shout them down with cries of "fundamentalist" and "bigot".
No matter what happens, the crazies and the libs are NOT gonna drive me outa my church.
Those crazy Presbyterians (our denomination) are at it again. Pinging you for your info.
I crossed Redeemer (Presbyterian) off my list of possible churches simply because a young woman who led the congregation in prayer prayed for the Iraqi people without also praying for our troops.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.