Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Teen Girls Lack Basic Facts About Most STDs
Internet Broadcast System ^ | 1/5/06 | Staff

Posted on 01/05/2006 6:54:35 AM PST by Millee

Most sexually active teenage girls know relatively little about sexually transmitted diseases until it is too late, according to new research.

In a survey of 300 adolescent girls in the Pittsburgh area, Carnegie Mellon University researchers found that girls who reported having been diagnosed with an STD knew more about that particular disease than other girls, but did not know more about the other diseases.

The findings are published in the January edition of the Journal of Adolescent Health.

On average, with the exception of HIV/AIDS, the teens did not know many basic facts about STDs, said Julie Downs, lead author of the study.

"Our schools have decided to focus on AIDS, and that has come at a cost," she said. "Teens just aren't being taught about these other diseases, and so they may come away with a false sense of confidence."

The study's findings are troubling because teenagers who know little about STDs are more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior and to delay the treatment of STDs, the researchers said.

And the consequences can be severe. Genital herpes, for example, cannot be cured. Genital warts can render a woman more susceptible to cervical cancer, and chlamydia can lead to infertility.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: abstinence; chastity; moralabsolutes; promiscuity; sexed; std; stupidteens; vd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-231 next last
To: Blzbba

You are kidding right? The reason the rates are high is becuase they are encoruaged to be whores, and not old at all about things likew HPV.


41 posted on 01/05/2006 7:31:50 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana

"And, of course, keep treating teens like mindless hormones with feet utterly incapable of self-control."

Did I suggest that? I don't think so. I'd rather treat them like young people who can understand factual information and act on it.

Telling teens to just say "no" to sexual activity has not worked out all that well. Teens need real information about sexuality and the consequences of sexual activity.

Since some teens will engage in sexual activity, despite all of our wishes and attempts to get them not to do so, then information on how to prevent pregnancy and minimize the risks of STDs is also important information for them to have.


42 posted on 01/05/2006 7:32:30 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

"Maybe we should go back in time a bit and do things the way we did in the 50s. It's not like there are only 2 ways of doing this. "


Educate me. How did we do it (not THAT 'it'!! Sex Ed!!) in the 50s? I'm not old enough to recall!!


43 posted on 01/05/2006 7:33:05 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

HPV can be on skin, condom won't even protect you there and HPV can develop into cancer


44 posted on 01/05/2006 7:33:08 AM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"maybe eventually they will learn that the more sex they have with as many partners as possible is actually a good thing."



The vast majority of hormone-driven teenage boys probably believe this regardless of what you teach!!


45 posted on 01/05/2006 7:33:47 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Millee
Study: Teen Girls Lack Basic Facts About Most STDs

Stud: Laz Willing To Teach Teen Girls

46 posted on 01/05/2006 7:34:02 AM PST by Lazamataz (I have a Chinese family renting an apartment from me. They are lo mein tenants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"You reap what you sow. Engage in risky sexual behavior and deal with the consequences."

Indeed. While you may well have had no sexual activity when you were a teen, other teens were not abstinent, however old you are.

Some teens are always sexually active. I think we should help those teens understand how to minimize the risks of STDs and pregnancy. The ones who will remain abstinent will still remain abstinent.


47 posted on 01/05/2006 7:34:32 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mel

Correct. Its also rampant on college campuses and not taught at all health classes.


48 posted on 01/05/2006 7:34:42 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
Nope. It's all about "abstinence".

Seems to me that those VD horror story films were a pretty good argument for abstinence all by themselves....

49 posted on 01/05/2006 7:34:57 AM PST by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Well, it might help with our birth rate among teenagers, which is the highest in the industrialized world. But, hey, who cares?

Our overall birthrate is one of the highest in the industrialized world. If Europe has a lower birthrate among teens, it's most likely a reflection of the entire shrinking society shying away from parenthood.

50 posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:32 AM PST by atomicpossum (If I don't reply, don't think you're winning. I often just don't bother to argue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Since some teens will engage in sexual activity, despite all of our wishes and attempts to get them not to do so, then information on how to prevent pregnancy and minimize the risks of STDs is also important information for them to have.

Since some teens will engage in gang activity, despite all of our wishes and attempts to get them not to do so,

Since some teens will engage in hate crimes, despite all of our wishes and attempts to get them not to do so,

Since some teens will engage in suicide, despite all of our wishes and attempts to get them not to do so,

Since some teens will engage in reckless driving, despite all of our wishes and attempts to get them not to do so,

51 posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:34 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pondman88

"The trend is down and the trend coincides with the "sexually oppressive"
teaching of abstinence. Abstinence is more healthy than promiscuity, especially among teens"


It's not really provable exactly what this trend coincides with. Abstinence-only...or being taught the dangers of unprotected sex...or just seeing the effects of AIDs?

I could as easily make the argument that the trend coincides with more education about birth control...but couldn't 'prove' that beyond a shadow of a doubt either.


52 posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:39 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

As long as they understand child support is for 18 years, there should be no problem.


53 posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:45 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Maybe it should be the parents' responsibility to educate their children about sex. Novel theory, no?


54 posted on 01/05/2006 7:36:37 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Puts a new spin on cramming for finals.


55 posted on 01/05/2006 7:36:40 AM PST by atomicpossum (If I don't reply, don't think you're winning. I often just don't bother to argue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"Then deal with the consequences of choices. It's all part of growing up."


We'll have to respectfulyl agree to disagree then. I'd rather try to educate the child to prevent them from getting AIDs or having/causing an unwanted pregnancy, rather than kicking them to the curb with the message of "Deal with the consequences".


56 posted on 01/05/2006 7:37:11 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Millee
remember watching those "VD" films in sex ed and they scared the bejeebers out of me. Do they not show those anymore?

Now a days, it seems it's all about putting condoms on cucumbers and teaching about alternative sexual lifestyles. They need to show the shocking films that display what advanced cases of STD's look like. The bigger the gross out factor, the more scared girls will be to either accept advances from or initiate advances to their male friends. Just teaching abstinence or condom use isn't going to get the message out about the dozens of diseases. Hepatitis C is now the big one. You don't even know you have it until 20 years later when your liver conks out and you die.

57 posted on 01/05/2006 7:37:36 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom

"Some people make it sound like every teenager has sex. They don't. I know, I was one of the kids that didn't (and I was very cute). I also had lots of other girlfriends that didn't have sex when we were teenagers. "

Of course not all teens are sexually active. Some teens, however, are. That's always been the case. Pretending that we can somehow make kids abstain from sex by telling them that they should abstain is little more than happy talk.

I don't know what your reasons for being abstiment in high school were. Whatever they were, you would probably have abstained whether you were given comprehensive sex education or not. Lots of kids don't have sex in high school. Lots of others do. There it is. Telling them not to is not going to change that.


58 posted on 01/05/2006 7:38:03 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tioga

"wrong - they just hand out condoms now......"


Wrong. Most kids can't get condoms in high schools. The actions of liberal in California aren't reflective of schools across America.


59 posted on 01/05/2006 7:38:19 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
Sex ed starts in what, first grade now? How much more education will they need? My parents didn't have sex ed in school yet the STD rate and pregnancy rates were much lower. I wonder why that is?

And who says it's is the federal government's job to teach my kids about sex? I thought that was my job.
60 posted on 01/05/2006 7:39:35 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson