Skip to comments.
ANN COULTER -- Why We Don't Trust Democrats With National Security
Human Events Online ^
| January 4, 2006
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 01/04/2006 4:05:09 PM PST by bigsky
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
1
posted on
01/04/2006 4:05:12 PM PST
by
bigsky
To: bigsky
2
posted on
01/04/2006 4:06:33 PM PST
by
bigsky
To: bigsky
Why We Don't Trust Democrats With National SecurityBecause the Democrats believe all conflicts can be solved with talk or limited surgical military involvment. We know they don't have the intellectual toughness to make hard decisions that will cost lives in order to save even more lives. That's why.
3
posted on
01/04/2006 4:07:46 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(The first and great commandment is: Don't let them scare you. --Elmer Davis)
To: bigsky
Why don't we trust Democrat's with National Security?
Because they are democrat's
enuf said.
4
posted on
01/04/2006 4:07:56 PM PST
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: bigsky
"ANN COULTER -- Why We Don't Trust Democrats With National Security"
I sure don't trust them with the patriot act.... for tht matter I won't automatically trust the next Republican President.
5
posted on
01/04/2006 4:09:12 PM PST
by
gondramB
(If even once you pay danegeld then you never get rid of the Dane.)
To: edcoil
6
posted on
01/04/2006 4:09:36 PM PST
by
MarkeyD
(Cowards cut and run. Marines finish the job. I really, really loathe liberals.)
To: bigsky
7
posted on
01/04/2006 4:09:41 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: bigsky
Why We Don't Trust Democrats With National Security
I don't trust them with anything.
8
posted on
01/04/2006 4:10:29 PM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: oh8eleven
"If the Democrats had any brains, they'd distance themselves from the cranks demanding Bush's impeachment for listening in on terrorists' phone calls to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. (Then again, if they had any brains, they'd be Republicans.) "
Haha!
To: bigsky
11
posted on
01/04/2006 4:14:48 PM PST
by
My2Cents
(Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
To: bigsky
Why are we worried about terrorist attacks anyway. The primary targets are New York City and LA. Both predominantly Liberal.
Let them reap what they sow.
Seriously, we can't and must not allow a successful attack on any US city.
12
posted on
01/04/2006 4:17:25 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: bigsky
Democrats believe that, during a war, Democrats have a right to maintain conversations with enemy headquarters, without those conversations being monitored by anyone.
Unfair?
How many arab terrorists with US citizenship do you suppose vote Republican?
13
posted on
01/04/2006 4:18:29 PM PST
by
marron
To: bigsky
If the Democrats had any brainsAh, but there's the rub. And to make matters worse, they have no morals.
14
posted on
01/04/2006 4:18:49 PM PST
by
My2Cents
(Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
To: bigsky
I`ll start thinking about trusting them when there is substantial evidence that they want us to win.
15
posted on
01/04/2006 4:19:00 PM PST
by
carlr
To: bigsky
::Yawn:: Ann "Chief Justice Roberts is a Souter clone" Coulter is the most overrated conservative "leader" on FR. I miss Barbara Olsen.
16
posted on
01/04/2006 4:19:50 PM PST
by
BillyBoy
(Find out the TRUTH about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "Best Friend" in the GOP... www.nolahood.com)
To: bigsky
It seems Democrats have no problem with the violation or lack of rights involving Government agencies that can really ruin your life like the IRS. I don't hear cries to make government agencies operate under the same laws and limits that are imposed on businesses and citizens. What I have to wonder is why al aqaeda connected individuals would be calling US representatives and senators in the Democratic party on a regular basis. Answering that question would be a real story.
17
posted on
01/04/2006 4:19:52 PM PST
by
Ma3lst0rm
(Thinking for yourself is not illegal or a sin even.)
To: My2Cents
I'm here for the articles, and the photos.
18
posted on
01/04/2006 4:20:47 PM PST
by
neodad
(Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
To: bigsky
A few weeks ago, I heard someone attempt to characterize Ann as "Michael Savage in high heels." That is preposterous and simply untrue. Michael Savage is frequently out of control, to wit, the loss of his television show a few weeks after its inaugural. Ann is an "in control" person and frequently reduces those who oppose her to some sort of stammering defense.
In my book, this woman is not only pleasant to look at, she is a nightmare to those on the left. The title of her book, "How to Talk to a Liberal, if You Must," pretty well sums it up.
19
posted on
01/04/2006 4:21:41 PM PST
by
davisfh
To: bigsky
Priceless, as usual.
Thanks for posting.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson