Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abramoff Pleads Guilty, Will Cooperate (20 Congressmembers Under Investigation!)
Breitbart.com ^ | 2.02.06 | Mark Sherman

Posted on 01/03/2006 3:42:41 PM PST by CarlEOlsoniii

Once-powerful lobbyist Jack Abramoff pleaded guilty Tuesday to federal charges of conspiracy, tax evasion and mail fraud, agreeing to cooperate in an influence-peddling investigation that threatens powerful members of Congress.

In a heavily scripted court appearance, Abramoff agreed with U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Huvelle when she said he had engaged in a conspiracy involving "corruption of public officials." The lobbyist also agreed when she said he and others had engaged in a scheme to provide campaign contributions, trips and other items "in exchange for certain official acts."

"Words will not ever be able to express my sorrow and my profound regret for all my actions and mistakes," Abramoff said, addressing the judge. "I hope I can merit forgiveness from the Almighty and those I've wronged or caused to suffer."

To each of the three charges, Abramoff said, "I plead guilty, your honor." Huvelle and lawyers in the case referred to restitution possibly reaching $25 million in the case. As is typically the case in such pleadings, what happened in the courtroom Tuesday was arranged in advance between lawyers for the defendant and the prosecutors.

Abramoff faces 30 years in prison, and he will cooperate with federal prosecutors in a wide-ranging corruption investigation that is believed to be focusing on as many as 20 members of Congress and aides.

Abramoff's travels with former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay are already under criminal investigation. The lobbyist's interactions with the Texas Republican's congressional office frequently came around the time of campaign donations, golf outings or other trips provided or arranged by Abramoff for DeLay and other lawmakers. In all, DeLay received at least $57,000 in political contributions from Abramoff, his lobbying associates or his tribal clients between 2001 and 2004.

Court papers released Tuesday also detailed lavish gifts and contributions that Abramoff gave an unnamed House member, identified elsewhere as Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, chairman of the House Administration Committee, in return for Ney's agreement to use his office to aid Abramoff clients.

Ney's lawyer, Mark Tuohey, said Tuesday that the charges against Abramoff were "nothing new." He said they repeated information in the November plea agreement from Abramoff's lobbying partner, Michael Scanlon.

Abramoff also was expected to plead guilty in Florida to two of the six charges in a federal indictment, according to his lawyer there, Neal Sonnett. A change of plea hearing has been scheduled in Miami for Wednesday afternoon, Justice officials said.

Prosecutors say Abramoff and Scanlon conspired to defraud Indian tribes in Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi and Texas of millions of dollars. Abramoff reaped roughly $20 million in hidden profits from the scheme, according to the information. Scanlon pleaded guilty in November.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: 109th; abramoff; corruption; cz1; moneywhores
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-162 next last
To: summer

thats right. I didnt take anything and by the way I am returning it all. Its alredy started.


81 posted on 01/03/2006 5:04:33 PM PST by buckeyesailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

What is the difference between Abramoff and Soros?


82 posted on 01/03/2006 5:05:00 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
I expect only a few indictments and at most, only one conviction of an actual lawmaker. But, that still would be big.

Not to mention a good start.

83 posted on 01/03/2006 5:05:37 PM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: buckeyesailor

Absolutely correct!


84 posted on 01/03/2006 5:05:39 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
If they are dirty, regardless of party affiliation, try them and fry them.

Amen. Get 'em all.

85 posted on 01/03/2006 5:05:50 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

Most who get in trouble with this will be congressional staffers I think. It is easier to get the small fish.


86 posted on 01/03/2006 5:06:19 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Nothing to me.


87 posted on 01/03/2006 5:06:26 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
I believe that the ammendment changing *HOW* Senators were elected is the worst one out there (next to income tax ... but, heh ) I am for a "Constitutional Restoration act of 20.." to make Sentators accountable to State Legislatures!!!! Then I can go down the street and gripe to my local state congresswoman (well, I used-to-could; she quit a few years ago, but she only lives a block away!!!) about our Senator (I don't have any gripes, right now, this is a hypothetical.... but if I lived in PA.......) and our Senator would hear about our collective gripes much more accurately than they do now.
88 posted on 01/03/2006 5:09:19 PM PST by true_blue_texican ((grateful Texican!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: buckeyesailor

thats right. I didnt take anything and by the way I am returning it all. Its alredy started.


Hastert announced today that he is giving the money to charity...I imagine a lot of charities to recieve windfalls in the coming weeks....


89 posted on 01/03/2006 5:12:11 PM PST by mystery-ak (End Freepathons, become a monthly donor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: Darkwolf377

Well, I'm sure that merely being a recipient of his donations doesn't implicate the person with being a part of his crimes.

I doubt he had something illegal going on with each and every recipient.

I'm sure we'll never hear of some of the democrat criminals he was in cahoots with.

And the Republicans will all be painted as being crooked if Abramoff ever donated a dime to any of their campaigns.


91 posted on 01/03/2006 5:16:47 PM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
For what it is worth, here is the Abramoff Top 20 regardless of party. Interesting that the WaPo provided this Top 20 list and this thread suggests that 20 are under investigation. No connection is implied.

The money is pretty well spread on both sides, there will be no blood.

92 posted on 01/03/2006 5:17:24 PM PST by oldbrowser (No matter how cynical I get, I can't seem to keep up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Thanks for posting that graph...I didn't know that we could post it since it was from the Wash Post...


93 posted on 01/03/2006 5:21:05 PM PST by mystery-ak (End Freepathons, become a monthly donor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
what did he get for these contributions?

Too soon to tell.

94 posted on 01/03/2006 5:23:02 PM PST by Jim Noble (Fiat justitia, ruat coelum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Yes I completely agree that this is a much bigger deal than people are making it out to be. Mr. Abramoff funneled tens of millions of dollars illegally from the Indians. He will have his testimony and the testimony, most likely of aides, of others. He probably has countless emails, and he will bring them all out. I see multiple convictions if he can give hard enough evidence, and he will now try.


95 posted on 01/03/2006 5:24:09 PM PST by CarlEOlsoniii (Janice Rogers Brown for PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

we agree.

that's why I liked ABSCAM - all nice and neat on video tape.

look at the stuff they had on Toricelli - they still couldn't indict him.


96 posted on 01/03/2006 5:26:22 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii
It will only be a big deal for those politicians for whom some knowledge of the illegality of the contribution's source can be shown, or where a provable quid pro quo exists.

Might be a all of them, might be some, might be none.

Most likely a handful of them. Good riddance to them.

97 posted on 01/03/2006 5:28:03 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

Look who took the most - Senator John Kerry (D-MA) Received At Least – $98,550


98 posted on 01/03/2006 5:28:22 PM PST by airborne (If being a Christian was a crime, would there be enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
As for Abramoff, he is now the needy client. Andrew Blum, a spokesman for Abbe Lowell of Chadbourne & Parke, a law firm that Abramoff now employs.

Abbe Lowell, DEMOCRAT, of the Clinton IMPEACHMENT fame and kidnapping of Elian Gonzales.

99 posted on 01/03/2006 5:29:10 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: CarlEOlsoniii
I chose this variation of the circulating Abramoff articles because it reinforces the fact that 20 members of congress are under investigation.

Careful. The article does not say 20 members are, in fact, under investigation. It says, "...investigation that is believed to be focusing on as many as 20 members of Congress and aides."

"Is believed" -- by whom? The reporter?

"As many as" -- that's the top figure this reporter is giving. It could be fewer.

"20 members...and aides" -- is the figure of (as many as) 20 a mix of members and aides, or (as many as) 20 members plus an unspecified number of aides?

Reporters always like to hedge their bets with weasel words, especially when they are stating something not attributed at all, not even to anonymous sources, which is the case here.

100 posted on 01/03/2006 5:30:32 PM PST by Wolfstar ("We must...all hang together or...we shall all hang separately." Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson