Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/03/2006 10:28:19 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mlc9852

"Parents who traveled from South Carolina and Clearwater to bring their 11- to 13-year-old daughters to a five-day soccer tournament said they were shocked by the parade of sexually adventurous partygoers who sashayed through the glass-enclosed atrium, sometimes flashing breasts and bare buttocks in front of their children."

I would think that would be illegal...

I've read that ordinarily these groups reserve a closed off space.


2 posted on 01/03/2006 10:30:09 AM PST by gondramB (If even once you pay danegeld then you never get rid of the Dane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
Well, the kids have got to learn tolerance for all forms of alternative lifestyles and this helps supplement what they aren't taught in school. /sarc
4 posted on 01/03/2006 10:31:07 AM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

I hope the money made by the Crowne Plaza hotel from the "swingers" (I'd describe them as pathetically-eager-for-attention adult adolescents) will compensate them for the future bookings they're not going to get.


6 posted on 01/03/2006 10:34:27 AM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
However, several hotel employees, who spoke on the condition they not be identified, said about 200 swingers attended the New Year's Eve party Saturday night -- about half the number that attended a similar event a year earlier.

...


"The kids could see through the glass atrium into the ballroom where naked people were dancing," Young said. "There were exposed breasts, thongs and see-through dresses on women who were not wearing any underwear."

Wonder if these soccer families will still vote for Demoncrats or LIBERALtarians. Dare they make a JUDGEMENT call on this?

I thought it was illegal to undress like this?
14 posted on 01/03/2006 10:45:41 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

"Parents who traveled from South Carolina and Clearwater to bring their 11- to 13-year-old daughters "




All of whom said, in unison, "Ewwww! Gross!"


17 posted on 01/03/2006 10:48:50 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: eyespysomething
Young said a hotel manager at one point told the children from Carolina Elite Soccer Academy to move out of the lobby and into the swimming-pool area.

Sounds like a bad idea to me. The pool was probably in need of a good cleaning.

18 posted on 01/03/2006 10:50:28 AM PST by SittinYonder (That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
What people do in their own private time and as long as it is kept behind closed doors (preferably not hotels but their own private clubs or homes) is their business. These people really do not need to bring it to the public forum and need to have respect for others....... On a personal note I find this type of behavior disgusting....
25 posted on 01/03/2006 10:57:36 AM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
said about 200 swingers attended the New Year's Eve party Saturday night -- about half the number that attended a similar event a year earlier.

Usually swinger events rent out the entire hotel to avoid such problems. My guess is that when the event organizers weren't able to fill the hotel as they had done last year, the hotel had no other choice than to rent out the vacant rooms. The event should have been canceled or relocated to a smaller hotel. Both the hotel and the event organizers are at fault here.

26 posted on 01/03/2006 10:58:37 AM PST by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

I wonder whether common areas of hotels are considered "public spaces." If so, that's probably a whole lot of counts of indecent exposure the cops can charge these 'swingers' with.


29 posted on 01/03/2006 11:04:01 AM PST by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
Shouldn't be a problem. Soccer players rarely score. ba-da-bum
31 posted on 01/03/2006 11:07:34 AM PST by southernnorthcarolina (I've upped my standards! Up yours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick; najida; PaulaB; EX52D; teenyelliott; peacebaby; Millee; ...

I was in Punta Gorda, Florida nowhere near Orlando on New Year's Eve ping.......


32 posted on 01/03/2006 11:08:00 AM PST by day10 (Wherever you come near the human race there's layers and layers of nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

I've been to many similar competitive youth soccer tourneys across the nation. The Disney showcase is one of the top in the nation, and like many others, must certainly have contracted with a travel service to book a block of rooms at the hotel for their guests. The hotel knew full well that they were booking both a Swinger's sex party AND a youth soccer tourney simultaneously. They are 100% at fault for not taking adequate steps to keep the two groups apart. They really never should've booked both groups in the first place. I fully expect that not only will the parents get after the hotel, but Disney should raise a major stink about it. There's simply no excuse for this!


37 posted on 01/03/2006 11:19:28 AM PST by BMIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

When I was a young pup, one day I was working at Disney during one of the Gayday celebrations, and this man asked me if I was taking out the trash, and I said "yes", and so he put his hand on his hip, like I was goign to escort him, and said- we'll let's go! I thought that was pretty funny...


40 posted on 01/03/2006 11:32:59 AM PST by emiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

"...a hotel that was hosting a New Year's Eve party for more than 200 self-described swingers, who had reserved a downstairs ballroom.."

It makes perfect sense that you would find swingers in a "ballroom".


43 posted on 01/03/2006 11:41:38 AM PST by BadAndy (The DemocRATs are the enemy's most effective weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
Even Disney tells guests when they book during Gay Days.

Is this true, I thought that was the main complaint, that Disney didn't tell people, and they wouldn't refund their $$

47 posted on 01/03/2006 11:58:00 AM PST by BreitbartSentMe (Ex-Democrat since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

Soccer parents I once knew would have viewed this as an extra perk.


50 posted on 01/03/2006 12:09:09 PM PST by add925 ("Never Interfere with a Lifestyle that Thins Out the Liberal Herd" - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
Walker's mother, Julie Downs, a 43-year-old registered nurse, said her children asked why they were restricted to their rooms and couldn't party on New Year's Eve.

I've been on the other side of this. The ex and I used to go to NYC once a year for a show, shopping, etc.

Nearly every year there would be some group of kids, either soccer, cheerleading or some family reunion. Every time the kids would be racing up and down the halls until the very small hours of the morning. Taking up tables in the bars and lounges, etc.

The parents would invariably treat the hotel as their private theme park and turn their kids loose.

No surprise with the laid back attitude of hotel management. They have probably seen enough 'gay days' from Disney to know the 'swingers' were pretty tame by comparison.

51 posted on 01/03/2006 12:14:50 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

Shoulda called the cops. I'm sure that nudity in front of children is covered under some statute somewhere.


53 posted on 01/03/2006 7:28:16 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

55 posted on 01/03/2006 7:38:19 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson