Skip to comments.
Samuel Alito May Surprise at Nomination Hearings
NewsMax ^
| 1/2/06
| Jason Barnes
Posted on 01/02/2006 10:20:03 AM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
"He will have a couple of hairs out of place," the unnamed participant said. "I am not sure his glasses fit his facial features. He might not wear the right color tie. He won't be tanned. He will look like his is from New Jersey, because he is." I would love to know if the New York Slimes wrote stuff like this when Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated. This is a Supreme Court nomination hearing, not a damn fashion show.
1
posted on
01/02/2006 10:20:06 AM PST
by
wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Yes, they can snidely criticize Katherine Harris's lipstick, but Ruth Bader Ginsberg's makeup is off limits.
2
posted on
01/02/2006 10:24:45 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
The very idea of seeing Ginsburg without makeup is extremely frightening.
3
posted on
01/02/2006 10:25:52 AM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
Without makeup?
4
posted on
01/02/2006 10:34:28 AM PST
by
jdm
(QOY "I'd hit it. Then I'd turn it over, praise Allah, and hit it again." Lazamataz on Osama's niece.)
To: Cicero
If you're going to talk about Katherine Harris you MUST provide a picture of her. LOL
5
posted on
01/02/2006 10:36:45 AM PST
by
Neville72
(uist)
To: wagglebee
Schumer dismissed the idea that Alito might turn the tables on his inquisitors?
It seems Schumer dost have a high opinion of himself and his Dims on the Judicial Committee. Roberts made fools out of couple of them at his hearing and I believe Alito will follow in his footsteps.
6
posted on
01/02/2006 10:48:27 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: jazusamo
"Judge Alito, are you now or have you ever been a member of the Republican Party?"
"Rmember you are under oath!"
To: wagglebee
"Overall," the Post writes, "the opinions Alito wrote are largely devoid of impassioned rhetoric or broad philosophic assertions. He grounds his views in close readings of legal precedents, statutes and government regulations." Just doing what any good judge should do. And no more!
8
posted on
01/02/2006 10:55:41 AM PST
by
upchuck
(Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
To: Semper Paratus
That'll be Biden's first question.
9
posted on
01/02/2006 10:55:52 AM PST
by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: Neville72
This is the one most male FReepers respond to positively:
10
posted on
01/02/2006 10:56:05 AM PST
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: jazusamo
Roberts made fools out of couple of them...These (Senators) are self made men. Roberts merely let them demonstrate publicly that they are fools.
11
posted on
01/02/2006 10:57:12 AM PST
by
FreePaul
To: savedbygrace
This is the one most male FReepers respond to positively: Yep...I respond every time...
12
posted on
01/02/2006 11:18:27 AM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: wagglebee
I think that Alito will be filibustered.
To: Mike Darancette
I don't think that they will filibuster this time. I think that they are too afraid of the "nuclear option." The way that Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid humiliated Frist by invoking rule 21 by surprise still fresh in memory. I don't think he will back down and many of the republicans in the Gang of 14 have said that if the democrats filibuster they will vote for the "nuclear option."
To: savedbygrace
This is the one most male FReepers respond to positively: Cannot imagine why......excuse me is it warm in here.......
15
posted on
01/02/2006 11:42:47 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
To: wagglebee
"He will have a couple of hairs out of place," the unnamed participant said. "I am not sure his glasses fit his facial features. He might not wear the right color tie. He won't be tanned. He will look like his is from New Jersey, because he is."
Such scholarly opinions/discourse at the NYTimes! I would recommend that they all take a look at what Harry Reid's objection to Roberts' nomination was, that having Roberts on the bench would make it look "less like America", more elitist. I'm not sure that most of us want the Supreme Court to look like some of the streets I drive through - the "Hey baby" segment of America.
To: Neville72
Compare and Contrast.
17
posted on
01/02/2006 1:09:19 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
OMG Its Fraziers ex-wife Merris ........
18
posted on
01/02/2006 1:33:15 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: savedbygrace
19
posted on
01/02/2006 1:36:02 PM PST
by
Dog
( ABMcM(Anybody but McCain....except Bill Frist))
To: jazusamo
I didn't see it. So what'd Roberts do?
20
posted on
01/02/2006 1:37:15 PM PST
by
Optimus Prime
(Do liberals even qualify as sentient beings?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson