Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samuel Alito May Surprise at Nomination Hearings
NewsMax ^ | 1/2/06 | Jason Barnes

Posted on 01/02/2006 10:20:03 AM PST by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
"He will have a couple of hairs out of place," the unnamed participant said. "I am not sure his glasses fit his facial features. He might not wear the right color tie. He won't be tanned. He will look like his is from New Jersey, because he is."

I would love to know if the New York Slimes wrote stuff like this when Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated. This is a Supreme Court nomination hearing, not a damn fashion show.

1 posted on 01/02/2006 10:20:06 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yes, they can snidely criticize Katherine Harris's lipstick, but Ruth Bader Ginsberg's makeup is off limits.


2 posted on 01/02/2006 10:24:45 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
The very idea of seeing Ginsburg without makeup is extremely frightening.
3 posted on 01/02/2006 10:25:52 AM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Without makeup?


4 posted on 01/02/2006 10:34:28 AM PST by jdm (QOY "I'd hit it. Then I'd turn it over, praise Allah, and hit it again." Lazamataz on Osama's niece.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

If you're going to talk about Katherine Harris you MUST provide a picture of her. LOL


5 posted on 01/02/2006 10:36:45 AM PST by Neville72 (uist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Schumer dismissed the idea that Alito might turn the tables on his inquisitors?

It seems Schumer dost have a high opinion of himself and his Dims on the Judicial Committee. Roberts made fools out of couple of them at his hearing and I believe Alito will follow in his footsteps.
6 posted on 01/02/2006 10:48:27 AM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Judge Alito, are you now or have you ever been a member of the Republican Party?"

"Rmember you are under oath!"

7 posted on 01/02/2006 10:52:19 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"Overall," the Post writes, "the opinions Alito wrote are largely devoid of impassioned rhetoric or broad philosophic assertions. He grounds his views in close readings of legal precedents, statutes and government regulations."

Just doing what any good judge should do. And no more!

8 posted on 01/02/2006 10:55:41 AM PST by upchuck (Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

That'll be Biden's first question.


9 posted on 01/02/2006 10:55:52 AM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Neville72
This is the one most male FReepers respond to positively:


10 posted on 01/02/2006 10:56:05 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Roberts made fools out of couple of them...

These (Senators) are self made men. Roberts merely let them demonstrate publicly that they are fools.

11 posted on 01/02/2006 10:57:12 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
This is the one most male FReepers respond to positively:

Yep...I respond every time...

12 posted on 01/02/2006 11:18:27 AM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I think that Alito will be filibustered.
13 posted on 01/02/2006 11:32:36 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I don't think that they will filibuster this time. I think that they are too afraid of the "nuclear option." The way that Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid humiliated Frist by invoking rule 21 by surprise still fresh in memory. I don't think he will back down and many of the republicans in the Gang of 14 have said that if the democrats filibuster they will vote for the "nuclear option."
14 posted on 01/02/2006 11:41:07 AM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
This is the one most male FReepers respond to positively:

Cannot imagine why......excuse me is it warm in here.......

15 posted on 01/02/2006 11:42:47 AM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

"He will have a couple of hairs out of place," the unnamed participant said. "I am not sure his glasses fit his facial features. He might not wear the right color tie. He won't be tanned. He will look like his is from New Jersey, because he is."

Such scholarly opinions/discourse at the NYTimes! I would recommend that they all take a look at what Harry Reid's objection to Roberts' nomination was, that having Roberts on the bench would make it look "less like America", more elitist. I'm not sure that most of us want the Supreme Court to look like some of the streets I drive through - the "Hey baby" segment of America.


16 posted on 01/02/2006 11:51:50 AM PST by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neville72

Compare and Contrast.

17 posted on 01/02/2006 1:09:19 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

OMG Its Fraziers ex-wife Merris ........


18 posted on 01/02/2006 1:33:15 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

I'm responding.


19 posted on 01/02/2006 1:36:02 PM PST by Dog ( ABMcM(Anybody but McCain....except Bill Frist))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I didn't see it. So what'd Roberts do?


20 posted on 01/02/2006 1:37:15 PM PST by Optimus Prime (Do liberals even qualify as sentient beings?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson