Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

---another study proving what we already know--with excellent satistical analysis--
1 posted on 01/01/2006 7:05:23 AM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank

And, in other news - Sunrise was at 8:03 AM today. :-)


2 posted on 01/01/2006 7:08:03 AM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Wow. Don't expect libs to trust their revered "scientific approach" this time. They only do this with evolution.


4 posted on 01/01/2006 7:17:56 AM PST by seppel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Two major media outlets were to the right of the American political midpoint: The Washington Times, at 35 percent, and Fox (the nightly news with Brit Hume) at 40 percent.

Three outlets were slightly left, but still close to the center: The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, CNN NewsNight with Aaron Brown, and ABC's Good Morning America - all at 56 percent.

The majority of the media clustered in the 60 to 69 range - significantly to the left of the average U.S. voter. These outlets were (in order of increasing leftishness) ABC's World News Tonight, NBC Nightly News, USA Today, the Today show, Time, U.S. News & World Report, NPR Morning Edition, Newsweek, CBS Early Show, and The Washington Post. Every one of these outlets was further from the American political midpoint than was Fox News.

At the far left of the major media spectrum were the Los Angeles Times (70), CBS Evening News (74), The New York Times (74), and The Wall Street Journal (85). The ratings were based only on news stories, so the left-leaning opinion pages at the Los Angeles Times and right-leaning opinion pages at The Wall Street Journal had no effect.


8 posted on 01/01/2006 7:27:50 AM PST by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank; All
A request and a reminder to all of you media watchers;

"Mainstream" they are NOT. They are OLD MEDIA

It's evident that liberal media remains complicit with liberal's attempts to damage the Bush administration. It's appalling, especially with the CIA leaks of late.

Their demise is happening slowly but must be accelerated, and we're shooting ourselves in the foot every time we tag them with the label "Mainstream." Mainstream is one thing they certainly are not, as proven in election after election since 2000.

Why then, the insistance on crediting them with the "mainstream" tag? Are we not aware of the importance of framing the debate? It gives them far too much credit and slows their demise. They're losing circulation, losing rating points, closing bureaus. They're dieing, but too many here continue to prop up the "mainstream media" simply by identifying them as such. They are OLD MEDIA.

"OLD MEDIA" is perfect since the term differeniates them from NEW MEDIA, which is FR, the internet, radio, and non-liberal cable news, etc.

Please think twice about the subtle but important message you send every time you write "MSM." Additionally, once they are commonly thought of as OLD MEDIA, it will really tick 'em off.

9 posted on 01/01/2006 7:28:16 AM PST by chiller (MSM is more correctly 'OLD Media'. USE IT ! Please !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
Maybe they can do another "study" proving that water is wet..........
</sarcasm>
13 posted on 01/01/2006 7:34:18 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
At the far left of the major media spectrum were the Los Angeles Times (70), CBS Evening News (74), The New York Times (74), and The Wall Street Journal (85). The ratings were based only on news stories, so the left-leaning opinion pages at the Los Angeles Times and right-leaning opinion pages at The Wall Street Journal had no effect.

Oh Boy! I can’t wait to see this on See BS!
14 posted on 01/01/2006 7:35:15 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Well the elephant in the room here is that conservative "bias" tends toward an examination of all aspects of a story, not just sorting out the "facts" that support a political viewpoint. I don't think the study controlled for that. LOL.

If you cite the conservative point of view, without sneering code words, that automatically makes you conservative, doesn't matter if you examine the liberal one as well.


15 posted on 01/01/2006 7:37:53 AM PST by Kay Syrah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

[If I read those stats right...]

15% right of center
Washington Times

10% right of center
Fox/Brit Hume

4% left of center
NewsHour/Lehrer
CNN News/Aaron Brown [didn't he get canned by CNN?]
ABC Good Morning America

10-19% left of center
ABC World News Tonight
NBC Nightly News
USA Today
Today show
Time
US News & World Report
NPR Morning Edition
Newsweek
CBS Early Show
Washington Post

20% left of center
Los Angeles Times

24% left of center
CBS Evening News
New York Times

35% left of center
Wall Street Journal


16 posted on 01/01/2006 7:39:39 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

...strikes again. They figured it out.

17 posted on 01/01/2006 7:40:07 AM PST by Pharmboy (The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

ABC GMA is only sightly left? Not in my opinion!


18 posted on 01/01/2006 7:56:55 AM PST by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

You don't say??


22 posted on 01/01/2006 8:09:47 AM PST by ladiesview61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

What is not noted here is how far left the "center" has been biased by the bias that exists. Because the vast majority of media has been left biased for decades, it has shifted the power in congress far to the left.

The "center" in congress today is far left of where it would be if the old media had not been trying to move it left for decades.


24 posted on 01/01/2006 8:34:22 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Women and children hardest hit......


25 posted on 01/01/2006 8:40:03 AM PST by Nasty McPhilthy (Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Gosh, at first I thought that Ted Kopel had finally come clean.


26 posted on 01/01/2006 10:50:09 AM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

My wife subscribes to US. News and Gibberish er World Report. Despite having John Leo and Michael Barone as regular columnists, I still can't stand to peruse the rag with the godawful drumbeat of leftist propaganda in its basic reporting.


29 posted on 01/01/2006 1:43:33 PM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson