Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dow slumps triple digits as Treasury yield curve inverts (recession indicator)
MarketWatch.com (by Dow Jones) ^ | 12/27/05 | Tomi Kilgore

Posted on 12/27/2005 1:36:38 PM PST by SierraWasp

Dow slumps triple digits as Treasury yield curve inverts ($INDU, $COMPQ, $SPX, $TNX) by Tomi Kilgore

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- U.S. stocks closed sharply and broadly lower, with the Dow industrials suffering its first triple-digit loss in 2 months, as the Treasury yield curve inverted for the first time in five years, sparking fears of a possible recession. The Dow ($INDU) slumped 105 points to an unofficial close of 10,778, its lowest close in 2 weeks and the biggest one-day point loss since Oct. 27. The Nasdaq Composite ($COMPQ) shed 22 points to 2,227 and the S&P 500 ($SPX) slid 12 points to 1,257. The 2-year Treasury note yielded 4.347% while the 10-year Treasury yield ($TNX) fell 0.039 percentage points to yield 4.341%; the only time in the last 30 years that an inverted yield curve wasn't followed by a recession was in 1998, when the curve inverted briefly during the Asian financial crisis. Recession worries overshadowed a sharp drop in natural gas prices amid reports of warmer-than-usual weather, with the front-month futures contract tumbling 10% to a 4-month low of $11.022 per million British thermal units on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigcharts.marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bonds; chickenlittle; currencycollapse; depression1990; djia; indicator; interestrates; recession; yieldcurve
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: dubyaismypresident
Doesn't it still take 3 days to settle (t+3) in which case tax losses taken tomorrow will be settled in the new year.

Trade date, not settle date, is used by IRS.

21 posted on 12/27/2005 1:59:09 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
If they hadn't overreached in their raising of short term rates, there wouldn't be a yield curve inversion.

In its place we would have had currency devaluation and exchange driven inflation.
22 posted on 12/27/2005 2:03:40 PM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

You'll see that ALL the time EXCEPT when a notably strong sector rotation is going on...under "normal" conditions one S&P point is worth 7-10 DJIA points. Eg; they most generally work in direct tandem, together, one doesn't "forecast" or "lag" the other.

I agree with you, though, something weird is going on. (if that's what you're saying!)


23 posted on 12/27/2005 2:05:51 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Funny taglines are value plays.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

This question is like asking why Daddy won't let Junior run the power saw.


24 posted on 12/27/2005 2:06:09 PM PST by xcamel (a system poltergeist stole it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

It does not indicate recession. It simply indicates that investors think interest rates will be lower in the future.


25 posted on 12/27/2005 2:09:41 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

It'll all get bought back in about ummm... 31 days.

Actually if they were smart they would have filed with the IRS a certain way last year where they can sell losers and buy back any time they want. The 30 day rule is not in this type of filing. If I remember right it's called Mark to Market, and please correct this anybody who knows for sure.


26 posted on 12/27/2005 2:09:56 PM PST by jwh_Denver (New Year's Resolution #1. Try to cut to half those looks my wife gives me. .....punt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; Ernest_at_the_Beach; tubebender; NormsRevenge; hedgetrimmer; ElkGroveDan; calcowgirl; ...

I wonder what effect this may have on the market for Schwartzenegger's massive bondage for infrastructure???


27 posted on 12/27/2005 2:12:06 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a
"speculators are going to pay for betting against the American dream in 2006."

I like the way you think!!!

28 posted on 12/27/2005 2:17:14 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
One good result of all this...

Plunging bond yields. Should give a nice boost to the housing market in January, especially in New York City, when the record bonuses will be spent.


29 posted on 12/27/2005 2:17:46 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

The smart ones ain't spending their bonuses on NYC real estate.


30 posted on 12/27/2005 2:18:46 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
the only time in the last 30 years that an inverted yield curve wasn't followed by a recession was in 1998,

I beg to differ. We were in recession in 2000/2001

31 posted on 12/27/2005 2:21:05 PM PST by Go Gordon (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
It simply indicates that investors think interest rates will be lower in the future."

What? Short term rates, or long term rates? Wouldn't either of those rates becoming lower stimulate the economy? Then why is this Dow Jones owned news service speading such stupendous lies???

32 posted on 12/27/2005 2:24:31 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Oh! And wouldn't lowering interest rates seen in the future make the bond market go nuts with glee???


33 posted on 12/27/2005 2:28:03 PM PST by SierraWasp (EnvironMentalism... America's establishment of it's new unconstitutional State Religion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Time to panic.


34 posted on 12/27/2005 2:28:30 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver

"Mark to market" is (in this case, for this reference) a method of accounting for stock/security gains and losses which is more in line with the way a frequent trader works. The trading dept of a Goldman Sachs or Lehman almost certainly works in this fashion; an individual trader has to apply to use the method a solid year or more in advance (eg; you cannot decide retroactively that you were a daytrader last year and use the method) There are a number of implications, not all of which are clearly beneficial or detrimental. For one, I believe you're correct, that the "wash sale" rule need not apply. Also, I think the $3K limit on capital losses/yr doesn't apply. One who elects this method may also cut themselves off from cap gain treatment on stock gains. Also, I think the M2M election is irrevocable. As usual, there is a highly readable/sarc IRS publication detailing the particulars.


35 posted on 12/27/2005 2:28:43 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Funny taglines are value plays.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Yup.


36 posted on 12/27/2005 2:31:48 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
That was my point (poorly worded) that working in tandem at those % it does forecast a trend.
37 posted on 12/27/2005 2:34:14 PM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Time to panic.

Nah, I'm keeping my cool.

If the economy could grow as well as it did in 2005 despite natural disasters and very high energy prices then 2006 should be at least decent. If you haven't noticed, energy prices are tanking.

38 posted on 12/27/2005 2:34:27 PM PST by NeoCaveman (If we ever banned air conditioning, I think people would move back, - Bob Bennet Ohio GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Time to panic.

I am always paniced. I am typing this from my Y2K shelter.

39 posted on 12/27/2005 2:35:03 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Oh my, Market falls to its lowest level in...its lowest close in 2 weeks... FReepers hardest hit!!!
40 posted on 12/27/2005 2:39:14 PM PST by tubebender (You can't make Chicken Soup from Chicken Poop...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson