Skip to comments.
Clinton saga gingerly handled in history textbooks (LEGACY ALERT!)
AP ^
| 12/27/05
Posted on 12/27/2005 12:46:33 PM PST by Valin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
12/27/2005 12:46:34 PM PST
by
Valin
To: Valin
2
posted on
12/27/2005 12:51:59 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: boomop1
Yet teachers and professors already preach that GWB is a criminal.
3
posted on
12/27/2005 1:01:57 PM PST
by
Bullitt
To: boomop1
4
posted on
12/27/2005 1:02:27 PM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: boomop1
5
posted on
12/27/2005 1:03:18 PM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: Valin
Pre-College School books must be "G" rated NOT "G-string" rated.
To: Valin
History will judge Clinton as the American Nero.
He diddled away while terrorists struck time and time again.
And he did nothing but pass the problem to his successor.
He knew that he had neither the stomach for the fight nor the respect of the troops to persue the course.
7
posted on
12/27/2005 1:14:27 PM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(expell the fat arrogant carcasses of Congress)
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Oh sure, he was the joint in time, he was so influential. Things were going along just fine, and then Boss Hogg had to come in and ruin everything. Of course, it all started with the hippy generation, but it culminated with him. He sigle handedly sentenced this country to a slow decline and death. Shows how much one evil man can do.
8
posted on
12/27/2005 1:22:07 PM PST
by
emiller
To: Valin
As a general rule, history teachers don't teach the past 20-30 years or so. The teachers simply don't want wacky parents to object to events the parents remember with bias. Even if the textbook covered topics within 20-30 years, the course ends before those topics are reached. Think about it. I bet everyone's knowledge of history is the poorest in the 20 years or so before they were born.
That said, there is no need for lurid details about the Clinton impeachment. It was a straightforward case of perjury and obstruction of justice. Why discuss the lurid details? I bet the people complaining about it are the very same ones who think the Clinton impeachment was about sex.
To: Valin
Slicko made it a bit difficult for any historian that actually may want to write from an honest few point. How the heck does one say the Pres used to love to use cigars on a young women while in a closet giggling while his security advisor who just loved to stuff his jock strap and socks with classified materials keep phoning him concerning 30 minute maximum window in time to do something about Usama bin Laden, as he walked about a terrorist compound in his white robe.
Slicko has a sicko.
10
posted on
12/27/2005 1:29:02 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Unfortunately for our youth, the teachers in the public school, who largly remain ignorant of history (and many other subjects) will always portray BJBubba as the next best thing to a Saint.
11
posted on
12/27/2005 1:31:03 PM PST
by
newcthem
(9/11- not terrorists - just troubled youths.)
To: billorites
The Nixon tapes were key evidence in proposed impeachment... what was the evidence mentioned in Clinton's impeachment in the textbooks?
To: emiller
Of course, it all started with the hippy generation, but it culminated with him. Yes, that is true. Do you have evidence to the contrary?
To: SolidSupplySide
I bet the people complaining about it are the very same ones who think the Clinton impeachment was about sex.On the other hand, the more they say that, the more Clinter's legacy boils down to a BJ. The more moonbats try to minimize Slick's scandals and shortcomings, the more they cement his piss-poor and laughable legacy. What a bunch of maroons ... hehehe.
14
posted on
12/27/2005 1:39:44 PM PST
by
GaltMeister
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
To: Valin
Is President Reagan mentioned in any high school history books, as the fellow who knocked down the communist walls?
15
posted on
12/27/2005 1:49:59 PM PST
by
tillacum
(MERRY CHIRISTMAS ONE AND ALL. BIRTHDAY OF JESUS CHRIST, TEACHER.)
To: newcthem
Unfortunately for our youth, the teachers in the public school, who largly remain ignorant of history (and many other subjects) will always portray BJBubba as the next best thing to a Saint.Fortunately my son (now 19 and attending FIT in Melbourne, FL), learned more history from his dad than from his teachers.
We made it a family specialty....pizza many times.......to discuss current events and learn from them.
Now I have a son who questions the media and his profs......and comes to his own conclusions.
An educated voter is a patriot.
16
posted on
12/27/2005 2:17:31 PM PST
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(expell the fat arrogant carcasses of Congress)
To: Valin
What's so murky about what Bill Clinton was impeached for? Allow mw to give a try.
The president of the United States, in an attempt to fix a court case in which he was the defendant and an American citizen was the plaintiff with which he intended to deny Justice committed numerous crimes including, but not only the four articles of impeachment which were brought against him; Perjury, Witness Tampering, Obstruction of justice and Abuse of Power.
How'd I do? Not murky at all to me. Oh, as you see, Bill Clinton was not impeached for sex.
To: tillacum
President Reagan's tax cuts are mentioned in textbooks as mostly favoring the wealthy. Reading this a testbook prompted my first "letter to the editor".
To: HankReardon
Translation: It was all about sex. :-)
19
posted on
12/27/2005 3:44:25 PM PST
by
Valin
(Purple Fingers Rule!)
To: Valin
"....Absent are any the lurid details of his relationship with Monica Lewinksy that spiced up daily news report..."
Why? Wouldn't be any more 'lurid' or 'explicit' than what they hear in the average sex ed class...
Clinton's history should be placed right after feminism, sexual harassment movement. Just to show what hypocrites the dems are.
20
posted on
12/27/2005 4:48:57 PM PST
by
4Liberty
(Privatize don't subsidize. Vote Libertarian.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson