Posted on 12/24/2005 1:49:13 PM PST by presidio9
I, Hillary Rodham Clinton, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, so help me God."
On January 20, 2009, at precisely noon, the world will witness the inauguration of the forty-fourth president of the United States. As the chief justice administers the oath of office on the flag-draped podium in front of the U.S. Capitol, the first woman president, Hillary Rodham Clinton, will be sworn into office. By her side, smiling broadly and holding the family Bible, will be her chief strategist, husband, and copresident, William Jefferson Clinton.
If the thought of another Clinton presidency excites you, then the future indeed looks bright. Because, as of this moment, there is no doubt that Hillary Clinton is on a virtually uncontested trajectory to win the Democratic nomination and, very likely, the 2008 presidential election. She has no serious opposition in her party. More important, a majority of all American voters - 52 percent - now supports her candidacy.
But her victory is not inevitable. There is one, and only one, figure in America who can stop Hillary Clinton: Secretary of State Condoleezza "Condi" Rice. Among all of the possible Republican candidates for president, Condi alone could win the nomination, defeat Hillary
Condoleezza Rice, in fact, poses a mortal threat to Hillary's success. With her broad-based appeal to voters outside the traditional Republican base, Condi has the potential to cause enough major defections from the Democratic Party to create serious erosion among Hillary's core voters. She attracts the same female, African American, and Hispanic voters who embrace Hillary, while still maintaining the support of conventional Republicans.
This is a race Condi can win.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Gingrich's past would whitewash Clinton in the eyes of the disinterested voter.
"...that Israel-bashing aborionist."
Could you elaborate on that please.
"...that Israel-bashing aborionist."
Could you elaborate on that please?
|
|
NOT TRUE! He likes to have HIS toes sucked -- big difference.
The problem you are referring to has to do with wage competition, and, perhaps, cultural dillution. Either can be problematic, but neither is the same thing as national security.
"Condi is also pro gun. Regardless of all her faults if it comes to Condi v.Hillary, I vote for Condi and thank God I got the chance to do so."
My sentiments exactly!!! I've said all along that I believe that Condi is the only one who can beat Hillary. She would cut into Hillary's strongest base; the black vote big-time. You'll never convince me that the majority of the black people, who are finally starting to see the light anD realize they've been used by the Dems for decades; wouldn't jump at the chance to have a black woman President.
GO CONDI!!!!!!!
Ohhhh. Don't even say that. The very thought of the conservatives doing a "Third-Party" thing scares me. Let's fact it, not only did Ross Perot put Bubba in the White House but Ralph Nader's 98,000 votes in Florida in 2000, kept Al Gore OUT of the White House. Remember?
Member Opinion
McCain 47.7% 1,035
Third party 27.6% 599
Undecided/pass 11.4% 248
Sit it out 10.8% 235
Hillary 2.4% 51
Composite Opinion
McCain 48.4% 1,454
Third party 27.0% 812
Sit it out 10.1% 303
Undecided/pass 10.0% 299
Hillary 4.5% 136
At least 51 registered Freepers on this board OPENLY support VOTING for the Hilderbeast over McCain.
An additional 235 freepers on record as "staying home and REFUSING cast a vote for a pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, anti-Michael Moore candidate (even if that person is NOT McCain!) over the pro-abortion Marxist Hilderbeast, just to spite the GOP and elect Hillary if McCain is the nominee.
To the 286 freepers who have no qualms letting the Hilderbeast win an election over a pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun ally of the war on terror, I suggest your switch parties. There are a lot of conservative Democrats who will similarly claim to oppose Hillary but support her evilness when forced to pull the level on Election Day.
This tells me all I need to know about you. No point in further discussion.
I guess I don't understand how the black vote will help Condi. She's Sec.ofState and they call her an Uncle Tom. How will that change if she runs???
Typical isolationist. No need to hear the facts. Just cover your ears and proceed as if a cocoon can protect you.
Just my opinion mind ya but this is diversional BS filler material from a pandering propagandist POS presstitute, aka Dick Morris , playing upon the fears and fantasies of fools.....he sold us the Clintonistas with a pro agenda last time and he's selling us used goods with his anti agenda this time.
Again, just my personal opinion........:o)
Merry Chrismas !!
Condi would kill Hillary in the black vote. Do you really thing black would vote for a white woman over her?
One CFR goon is the same as another.
keep dreaming... the only way to counter Hillary is another woman. Fight fire with fire. Hillary vs. Cheney would be no contest since the MSM will be so pro-Hillary Cheney won't have a chance.
Hillary has no chance of winning and neither does Condoleeza Rice.
The rumors of a Condi vs. Hillary showdown in 2008 will never happen in reality.
If I was to guess, the DemocRATS have wised up and will pick a Southerner, since they saw that Carter and Clinton won and they were from the South.
I bet it will be Mark Warner, or perhaps the Democratic governor of another red state. I wouldn't put it past Reid himself to run for president.
The GOP candidate, in my humble opinion, might be George Allen of VA, George Pataki of NY, or Mike Huckabee of Arkansas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.