Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US monitored Muslim sites for radiation: report
Yahoo ^ | 12/23/05

Posted on 12/23/2005 12:00:17 PM PST by Sub-Driver

US monitored Muslim sites for radiation: report

5 minutes ago

U.S. officials have secretly monitored radiation levels at Muslim sites, including mosques and private homes, since September 11, 2001 as part of a top secret program searching for nuclear bombs, U.S. News and World Report said on Friday.

The news magazine said in its online edition that the far-reaching program covered more than a hundred sites in the Washington, D.C., area and at least five other cities.

"In numerous cases, the monitoring required investigators to go on to the property under surveillance, although no search warrants or court orders were ever obtained, according to those with knowledge of the program," the magazine said.

The report comes a week after revelations that the Bush administration had authorized eavesdropping on people in the United States. U.S. President George W. Bush has defended that covert program and vowed to continue the practice, saying it was vital to protect the country.

Senior U.S. officials, including FBI Director Robert Mueller, have repeatedly said Islamic militants appeared intent on acquiring weapons of mass destruction for an attack against the United States.

Mueller said in February he was "very concerned with the growing body of sensitive reporting that continues to show al Qaeda's clear intention to obtain and ultimately use some form of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-energy explosives material in its attacks against America."

An FBI spokesman declined to confirm or deny the U.S. News and World Report article and said, "We can't talk about a classified program."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; cair; cialeaks; counterterrorism; enemywithin; fifthcolumn; islam; jihadinamerica; leaks; mediacraticparty; mosquewatch; muslims; myturbanglowsindark; myturbanisdirty; nest; patriotleak; radioactivematerial; religionofpeace; saboteurs; sedition; spying; theenemywithin; traitors; treason; trop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-345 next last
To: Sub-Driver
monitoring required investigators to go on to the property under surveillance, although no search warrants or court orders were ever obtained, according to those with knowledge of the program," the magazine said.

Duh, you don't necessarily need either..even in a "criminal investigation"...but it makes such good copy...

321 posted on 12/28/2005 7:01:06 PM PST by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This nation can't even come together to save ourselves.
We might as well be half French!
MSM PULL YOUR HEADS OUT!!!


322 posted on 12/28/2005 7:09:28 PM PST by crashthe24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
This leak crap must stop

I suspicion the leak that needs plugging - literally is further up the food chain than media = they are only the conduit.

I suspicion the reason Bush doesn't go, hat in hand, through the "proper" channels (court/judges &/or security council on the hill is BECAUSE they leaks come from there.

We know all to well that we have many enemies to this country in the government. Some we all know - the two K's in the senate, for example, and many other sniveling lib-coms.

I can't be the only one that believes that any one of them would deep six this country if it meant gaining power and downing Bush.

Commies never have been able to take over a country peacefully -they must have chaos

323 posted on 12/29/2005 9:08:59 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I think revealing top secret information is a felony

Where have you been?

It's only a felony if you are a republican - and then, it doesn't have to be an actual act - just accused of one

324 posted on 12/29/2005 9:11:41 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
" Commies never have been able to take over a country peacefully -they must have chaos."
Your last statement delinates your knowledge base, which many a freeper appreciates to the hilt. I would object to your assertion that GWB finds pleasure in having his admin leak info such as the subject at hand, e.g. Intel orgs monitoring Islamic sites etc..
What purpose would that serve but to further have the L/MSM and idiots on the left attack him?
But surely I have no hesitation in believing some damn fool "usefull idiot" far left senator, congressmen privy to these activities, and or a similiar detractor employeed by the CIA, FBI etc., would not leak such activites.
Of what benifit would it serve GWB to have someone in his immediate employ leak such info?
325 posted on 12/29/2005 9:26:54 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
I would object to your assertion that GWB finds pleasure in having his admin leak info such as the subject at hand, e.g. Intel orgs monitoring Islamic sites etc..

Where on earth did I say this?

I am asserting that the leaks are coming from "The Hill" The Hill is the Senate - not the White House - and that GWB circumvents them because he knows this.

I am remembering that GWB's daddy was not only Pres. and Vise P., but before that, head of the CIA. He certainly knows about the snakes - and how they work.

I have long suspicioned that the "Western White House" was a very clever place to build and hold many working sessions with trusted leaders and foreign dignitaries - and SECURE from listening, bugging, etc. = It's way off in the williwacks - no way any bug could be installed and too far for listening devices, sneaking up on, etc. GWB learned at daddy's knee about the dark enemies of this country that walk the hallowed halls...

Why do you think these libs makes such a ruckus about GW spending time in Crawford - and try to spin it as tho' he was not working but slacking off when there more than two hours at a time. They'd like the public to complain about it and make him spend more time where they can keep track of what he's doing, who he's seeing and what's being done and said.

326 posted on 12/29/2005 9:49:56 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
Whoops. Forgive me. We are on the same wave length, western texas WH and all else you elucidated. Like I said in another post, about one hour back, the chianti must be going to my mind. Poor excuse I am for a carefull reader. Forgive me.
And a big Semper Fi to you. Damn chianti, nah, it is a xmas gift, must not ignore.
I fully support your statements. And yes, the Trosky Leninist recognize to some degree that is where GWB and crew form key policy just like many other Presidents used places like Camp David, Hot Springs Georgia etc..
Being an US east coaster past his bedtime, you will have to excuse any inconsistency, in my replie. Boy I seem to love the past bed time excuse!
You know what really frigtens me. Comments as made here, I really belive in my bones. We have so damn serious problems that are undermining this republic and what it used to stand for, that we at FR and associated sites, must weep.
327 posted on 12/29/2005 10:17:52 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I am outraged! If they want to keep a nuke in their home or church, why it's their RIGHT!

Your right, and my right, but not the right of enemy aliens or their agents.

328 posted on 12/30/2005 7:49:59 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Oh, so there's now a new "right" to radiological privacy, hidden in that penumbra somewhere?

Only if you think there is a reasonable expectation of privacy from someone monitoring your gamma ray emissions or sniffing for any escaped breakdown products.

329 posted on 12/30/2005 7:52:47 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Wasn't there some kid who tried to build a nuclear reactor out of smoke detectors?

Nah, just a "Dirty bomb".

330 posted on 12/30/2005 7:55:38 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The day after the story was published, the AG should have brought charges against them.

Indeed. From US Code Title 18, Section 793:

U.S. Code as of: 01/06/03
Section 793. Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense,
(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or
(2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.
(h)(1) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall forfeit to the United States, irrespective of any provision of State law, any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, from any foreign government, or any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, as the result of such violation. For the purposes of this subsection, the term ''State'' includes a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.
(2) The court, in imposing sentence on a defendant for a conviction of a violation of this section, shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States all property described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.
(3) The provisions of subsections (b), (c), and (e) through (p) of section 413 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853(b), (c), and (e)-(p)) shall apply to -
(A) property subject to forfeiture under this subsection;
(B) any seizure or disposition of such property; and
(C) any administrative or judicial proceeding in relation to such property, if not inconsistent with this subsection.
(4) Notwithstanding section 524(c) of title 28, there shall be deposited in the Crime Victims Fund in the Treasury all amounts from the forfeiture of property under this subsection remaining after the payment of expenses for forfeiture and sale authorized by law.

331 posted on 12/30/2005 8:08:59 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Aren't gieger counters detecting molecules that would be off the property?

In general Geiger counters are designed to detect ionizing radiation. They detect either gamma rays and X-Rays(very short wavelength electromagnetic waves) or particles such as Alpha particles (helium nuclei) or Beta particles (electrons given off by radioactive decay. Some only do the Gamma and X-rays.

These are all much smaller than molecules. The Gamma and even X-rays are readily absorbed by air, but creating secondary ions in the process. The Beta particles too are short ranged, (Good thing since your color TV, tube type, emits lots of them, even after they started putting in special screens). Alpha particles, OTOH, will drift around, although they eventually pick up a couple of electrons (creating ions of whatever they got the electrons from) and become ordinary helium atoms.

All these kinds of radiation/particles are given off during radioactive decay processes. Thus while the GC is detecting the ionizing radiation directly, indirectly it's detecting whatever atoms are emitting it. Could be americium, as in smoke detectors, or certain isotopes of Thorium, Cobalt, Uranium or Plutonium as well as many other "heavy" elements, or even lighter stuff like Sodium or Carbon (that's part of how carbon dating works, the Carbon-12 is unstable, albeit with a pretty long half life).

332 posted on 12/30/2005 8:35:05 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ironman
No. They detect radiation.

And energetic particles, such as Alpha and Beta particles. The former are simply helium nuclei, the later another name for electrons. The different names are because for some time it wasn't known they were the same things.

However all of these are stopped by small amounts of air, not to mention walls, so what is indirectly being detected is the particles, atoms, that are emitting the X-rays, Gamma Rays, and the Alpha and Beta particles. Those, often the breakdown products of earlier radioactive decay, or stray particles of something like Uranium or Plutonium, among many others, are what is really being detected, and those must be floating around in the air outside the buildings.

333 posted on 12/30/2005 10:05:44 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
One thing for sure, no one with that level of clearance has leaked to the MSM. Whoever did it is somebody on the periphery. If someone had that level of clearance and did this, they would be in a severe impediment for the rest of their lives.

Well if the leaker didn't have that level of clearance, how did he/she gain access to the information? There is one possibility, Congressmen, of both houses, do not require clearances, (many of them wouldn't stand a chance in hell of getting one) to see classified information. They do have to specifically ask for it though. Unless of course they pick it up in one of the required "leadership" briefings from the executive branch. Their staff requires clearances, but they don't. Of course they likely blab to their staffers, cleared or not.

334 posted on 12/30/2005 10:18:18 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If it were a low yield, we might be okay here (12-15) miles, but I wouldn't want to bet on it.

You'd likely be OK from a relatively low yield device. At least for the prompt effects, the fallout could still get you though. So if something like that happens, get the FReep out of there, preferably traveling at a right angle to the prevailing wind. Of course if the wind is blowing away from your location, you might be OK as well. BTW, don't look at the blast! Even a small one is hazardous to your eyes, even at that distance.

Look her for details.

335 posted on 12/30/2005 10:23:57 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
So NOW anyone making a nuke in their basement, mosque, church or business has the PRESUMED RIGHT of PRIVACY??

Sure, if you can manage to keep the stray atoms of your nuclear material, and it's decay byproducts, inside your building. To "sniff" inside would take a warrant, if we are talking US citizens, but outside does not.

336 posted on 12/30/2005 10:28:08 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk
More likely, as dawn begins to break over our marble heads, it's actual SENATORS from the House of Lords likely doing th leaking, along with a few representatives.

Much more likley, IMHO. They are the Elite, and the rules don't apply to them. You see the same sort of attitude among the more senior people in most any organization, but at least they think their security rule breaking is "harmless" (writing down combinations in their own personal code for example) and don't deliberately spill their guts to the press so that the enemy can read all about it the next day, or sooner on the internet.

337 posted on 12/30/2005 10:33:56 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I'm late to this thread, and maybe someone has already posted this obvious fact:

The U.S. Government already has an agency that monitors the air over my home and church without a warrant. It's called the EPA.

And those evil bureaucrats then go around this country (again without a warrant) telling U.S citizens that they've got to stop driving their cars, or stop burning charcoal briquets in their back yard, or put a cork in their cow's rearend, and on and on and on...

If I want to sit in my back yard, eat chili, and make methane all day long is one of these fascists going to come along and bust me? (without a warrant)

Has the MSM done anything to protect my right to make methane?


338 posted on 12/31/2005 12:42:17 AM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: p23185
The ultimate payback is that one of these islamofacist nukes goes off, it has to take out the Congresscritter that leaked!

Probably not. That's part of the deal he/she/they made to leak the info. They get advance warning of when it goes off, so they can be "...out of town..." at that time.

339 posted on 12/31/2005 12:54:07 AM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: john drake
If a nuclear terrorist attack occured on U.S. soil, I wouldn't want to be a Muslim, any Muslim, in America.

Well, the kind of environment and guts (or non PC policy) necessary to deal with a threat like this was last seen in 1838 when Missouri Governor Lilburn W. Boggs issued an Extermination Order against all Mormons in Missouri. Legalized mobbing, murder and plunder took place under that order (and before) primarily because the Mormons had the audacity to proclaim themselves against slavery, and their growing numbers made it possible any votes could swing Missouri to a free state. That, and numerous rumors and lies spread by anti-mormon clergy that the Mormons were "..going to do this...", or "...were going to do that..."

This Extermination Order was issued on the flimsiest of excuses, and today here we have numerous reliable reports that muslim mosques are being used as meeting/hiding/training places for muslim extremist terrorists, and we can't find one politician with testicles the size of Lillburn W. Boggs' mummified gonads to propose anything remotely similar for the muslims.

Where is Lillburn W. Boggs when you need him?

340 posted on 12/31/2005 1:07:44 AM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-345 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson