Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Bad Was Media's Reporting on Katrina?
Human Events ^ | 12/15/05 | Marvin Olasky

Posted on 12/17/2005 10:45:53 PM PST by LdSentinal

Last week, I wrote about the racism of the liberal media's Katrina coverage -- but that's only half the story. As I've been assessing press accounts of what was clearly the story of the year for 2005, it's become clear that press hysteria delayed rescues, prodded some politicians into making mega-billion dollar promises and may have created a long-term backlash.

How bad was the reporting? You probably saw and heard stories of mayhem at the Superdome and the Convention Center, and on the streets of New Orleans. You may have missed the admissions weeks later by NBC, the New Orleans Times-Picayune, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times that, as the Baltimore Sun noted, stories about "murders, rapes and beatings have turned out to be false."

"Hundreds of armed gang members killing and raping people" inside the Dome -- never happened. "Thirty or 40 bodies" stored in a Convention Center freezer -- not one. Rampaging "armed mobs" -- none. "Bands of rapists, going block to block" -- never happened. Geraldo Rivera's "scene of terror, chaos, confusion, anarchy, violence, rapes, murders, dead babies" -- well, that's Geraldo Rivera.

Orleans Parish District Attorney Eddie Jordan said four murders occurred in the entire city during the week after Katrina hit, making it a typical week in a city averaging 200 homicides per year. Sgt. 1st Class Jason Lachney, a Superdome patroller, described press reports as "99 percent (expletive)." The Superdome had one shooting: a Louisiana National Guardsman accidentally shot himself in the leg. New Orleans Coroner Frank Minyard said he had seen only seven gunshot victims during hurricane week: "Seven gunshots isn't even a good Saturday night in New Orleans."

Why the hype? Official sources like the mayor and the police chief were hysterical, and some reporters merely became megaphones for them. Crying and yelling made for better ratings than calm assessments of damage. Network stars wanted to display what passed as compassion. Since few reporters knew what was happening, a pack mentality kicked in, as reporters congregated in places of safety.

Politics also played a role, with liberals framing the story as one of rich people not caring about poor people and whites not caring about blacks.

But media exaggeration was not a victimless crime. It delayed the arrival of responders who, relying on press reports, had to plan their missions as military rather than philanthropic endeavors. New Orleans police stopped their search-and-rescue operations and turned their attention to the imagined mobs of rapists. Two patients apparently died while waiting for evacuation helicopters grounded for a day by false reports of sniper fire. Buses were slow to get to the worst place, the Convention Center.

Bush-bashing, of course, came to the fore, with the typical mainstream media view voiced well by former New York Times executive editor Howell Raines: "The churchgoing cultural populism of George Bush" means that "the poor drown in their attics." MSNBC, ABC, NPR and Newsweek journalists were among the multitude using calamity as an opportunity to campaign overtly for higher taxes and bigger government.

And yet, as the truth about the hyping of disaster trickled out during the fall, the momentum desired by the left disappeared and a backlash emerged. "We've had a stunning reversal," complained Robert Greenstein, director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal advocacy group in Washington. But whose fault was that?

There's precedent here: Propaganda about German atrocities in Belgium fueled sentiment for the United States to become involved in World War I, but when the truth came out Americans felt bamboozled and moved toward the isolationism that allowed for the rise of Hitler. British and French populaces also distrusted what seemed in the 1930s to be more scare stories about the Germans -- the larger effect of World War I propaganda may have been to bring about World War II.

The long-term effect of Katrina propaganda will probably be more cynicism. Reporters who lie or exaggerate create grinches.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: bias; hurricane; katrina; liberal; media; olasky; superdome; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2005 10:45:54 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

they still lie


2 posted on 12/17/2005 10:46:36 PM PST by satchmodog9 ( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

What's to report? It's a hurricane.

If you need more detail, google "hurricanes".


3 posted on 12/17/2005 10:49:43 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
and now we know that of the deaths recorded so far that the number of whites is higher than their average in the population down there while the number of blacks who died -so far counted- is lower than their representation in that area.

hhhmmmmm

4 posted on 12/17/2005 10:50:12 PM PST by GeronL (1678 computer infections and still Freeping!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
How Bad Was Media's Reporting on Katrina?

At least as bad as Beggin' Nagin and the non-use of all the buses.

5 posted on 12/17/2005 10:54:24 PM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? --- Victory is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

This is no longer free speech. This is tantamount to criminal activiy.

I say, "Book 'em, Danno."


6 posted on 12/17/2005 10:56:20 PM PST by writer33 (Rush Limbaugh walks in the footsteps of giants: George Washington, Thomas Paine and Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

Once again, I reiterate it is almost criminal in what the mainstream reporting did.


7 posted on 12/17/2005 10:57:05 PM PST by writer33 (Rush Limbaugh walks in the footsteps of giants: George Washington, Thomas Paine and Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Good coverage for the bash Bush crowd, just like every day.


8 posted on 12/17/2005 10:57:58 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Book 'em, Danno.

:)


9 posted on 12/17/2005 11:00:24 PM PST by writer33 (Rush Limbaugh walks in the footsteps of giants: George Washington, Thomas Paine and Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

How about Parish Presidents who lie?

Broussard, I think his name is...


10 posted on 12/17/2005 11:00:43 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

I remember getting clobbered on here when I said that Shepherd Smith was not on that bridge all the time as he had on different clothes and was clean shaven. Those people also were not without water as they actually showed them getting water but Smith kept pushing the same story when they could have walked for help. And Anderson Cooper was worse.

When are the reporters on the scene going to apologize to everyone that watched those phoney broadcasts? I am not holding my breath!


11 posted on 12/17/2005 11:03:30 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII MOM -- Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Bush-bashing, of course, came to the fore, with the typical mainstream media view voiced well by former New York Times executive editor Howell Raines: "The churchgoing cultural populism of George Bush" means that "the poor drown in their attics."

God, that's sick. No wonder the N.Y. Times has become but a rancid bag of accumulated excrement.

12 posted on 12/17/2005 11:03:45 PM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? --- Victory is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Ted Kopple was responsible for the delayed response. He reported, irresponsibly, that New Orleans had dodged the bullet just 12 hours after Katrina had passed. Then the levys broke.

He did not go back on the air for 24 hours.

Say he is not responsible? The news to relief workers that night was limited to what they got on Nightline.

Blame Ted!


13 posted on 12/17/2005 11:08:51 PM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
It was as bad as this:


14 posted on 12/17/2005 11:10:36 PM PST by Richard Kimball (Tenure is the enemy of excellence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Someone please stop them before they trip over their tears. Oh forgot, they've already done that .........


15 posted on 12/17/2005 11:54:00 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

16 posted on 12/18/2005 12:01:39 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

is this your boyfriend or girlfriend?


17 posted on 12/18/2005 1:25:41 AM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Why is nobody asking,

why did the Orleans Levee District,
thru omission, decide that the 17th St and London Avenue
canals were not to have protective floodgates?


18 posted on 12/18/2005 2:59:51 AM PST by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: writer33

"Once again, I reiterate it is almost criminal in what the mainstream reporting did."



Fox's Shep Smith is just as bad


19 posted on 12/18/2005 3:05:42 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Hey, that's my 'tag' line!

;^)


20 posted on 12/18/2005 3:10:59 AM PST by McGarrett (Book'em Danno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson