Posted on 12/17/2005 9:01:38 AM PST by MissAntithesis
In the United States, we already have laws prohibiting torture. But, that wasn't enough for Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). McCain apparently "feels" (one of those liberal things) that torture is 'anything that makes terrorists uncomfortable'. Holy Smokes, Senator! Terrorists are supposed to be uncomfortable. Not only does McCain not want those who blow up people, buildings and behead those they haven't already killed to be treated with a gentler and more soothing attitude, he has also managed to push this anti-American enemy bill through--with terrorists now being extended rights under the US Constitution!
Personal Message to Senator McCain: It really is time, Sir, for you to run under the flag of your true belief system--the Democrat Party. Senator, we already know you that don't like conservatives and will attempt to run for President under some liberal platform. Certainly, you say you support the troops. But, your new "Al-Qaeda Rights Package" contradicts your words. I guess Hillary already has the Dem nomination pretty well sewn up--despite the insincere protestations from the Left. So, you won't be able to run as Prez for the Dems. I'm also guessing that joining Hillary as her running mate--for VP--is completely out of the question. But, with your ongoing liberal antics, do you really believe you'll win the Republican nomination? If so, you've been out of touch with the voters for way too long. To the mainstream liberal press, you're the Republican darling. But, it's the majority of Republicans--not Democrats--who will nominate a Republican presidential candidate. And like it or not, Senator, a great many Republicans still support a conservative ideology. Do you still remember what that entails?
If not, please allow me to assist in refreshing a few lost memories. To name but a few, Conservatives believe in less government, meritocracy and protecting American citizens from their enemies. The American people do not believe that extending more rights to barbarians and murderers will have any positive effect on either our country or to aid in their protection. In actuality, the Islamo-fascist terrorists see this move on your part and the parts of your liberal brethren as an act of appeasement and weakness. Surely, you know that. Or is it that you truly believe that there is a large enough liberal contingent in the Republican Party to nominate you for POTUS in 2008? This would be the contingent that includes liberal Senators Craig, Sununu, Murkowski, Hagel and Specter. Note: This is another gang of Democrat groupies that really should consider a switch in their Party affiliation.
Senator, both you and your state would be better-served if you flew the colors of the Democrat Party. Besides, you've been moving in that direction for years. You would be more comfortable there. Then, your constituency would actually know where you stand! And at least the Democrat Flag and Banner still contains one color that appears in the US Flag. Or is white considered a non-color?
© Copyright 2004-2005 by The Post Chronicle
Har! Me and my brothers were talking last night about how, if McCrazy ended up the GOP niminee, we would all sit out the '08 election NO MATTER WHO the rats were running. So that would also include our wives and voting-age children. If McCrazy ever got elected President, it would be by the rats anyways.
The elites that run this "Two-Party Cartel" will push this & with a 90% chance of getting their people elected. Since the sheeple are afraid of voting outside of the cartel this gets us these corrupt people.
N U T S.
Mc Cain gets angry, then frustrated, then flustered and then shot down.
McCain is as good being conservative as my dog is good at being a cat.
Yeah, and you sound like one of 'em.
BTTT
I'm working on a conservative moonbat of the year award and you are definitely in the running.
Coming from you, I'm honored.
If it is McCain vs. Hill and Hill wins, I'll try to get you a framed picture of Hitlery's inauguation.
He's not a liberal. He's something worse, an egotist.
Hey, aren't you the one who regularly wastes bandwidth defending RINO dirtbag Jim Kolbe? Why do you persist? This is a CONSERVATIVE forum. Neither McCain nor Kolbe are conservatives. Therefore, we're going to have a few choice things to say about them. If you don't like it, then go find a liberal Republican forum where your views may find better acceptance.
Kolbe is an honorable gentleman and a class act. You can disagree with him on the issues, but you character assasination is unbecoming a conservative.
I disagreed with Wellstone on almost every issue, but he was good guy. I wish I could say that about other democrats but I can't think of any that qualify.
Recently, the UCONN college republicans were commended for the respect they showed Cindy Sheehan. I'm surprised the "adults" on FR feel free to engage in the personal attacks on people who are on our side.
What is not becoming of a "conservative" is your continued defense of the alleged "character" of a person who wants our borders wide open after 9/11; wants to reward criminal invaders with free benefits, jobs, and citizenship; who excuses and condones the murder of children within literally inches of being born (see partial birth abortion procedure wherein the living child is birthed feet first, stopped in the birth canal before his head can emerge, a pair of scissors is jammed into the base of his skull, his brains are suctioned out through the widened hole in his head, his head is crushed with forceps, and the now murdered child his pulled from the mother); who either lived a false/sham marriage in order to deceive the voter or who betrayed his wife when he lived a deviant lifestyle; who continually lies to his constituents; who wants to destroy the core of our free society - the traditional family consisting of a mother, father, and children; who continually misleads leadership and the President on border issues; who continually pretends to represent the citizens in his district when, instead, he represents his own globalist agenda (see his participation in the Clinton Global Initiative; etc. I could on for pages and pages. The bottom line is that I've had to deal with Kolbe for over a decade. I've seen him in action and talked to him repeatedly in his town halls and other settings. I have no respect for him and despise him. When I first met him I was fooled by the fact that he called himself a Republican. Since then, in my dealings with him as a constituent, I've learned that he's not a Republican at all, definitely not a conservative, dishonorable, and disgusting.
His last campaign was an exercise in deception and treachery. He was challenged by conservative Republican Randy Graf and Kolbe spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to spread outright LIES about Graf. I would expect as much from a Democrat, but someone who is an "honorable" Republican should not campaign purely upon lies and deception. Kolbe did. He is a liar. He is scum.
I disagreed with Wellstone on almost every issue, but he was good guy. I wish I could say that about other democrats but I can't think of any that qualify.
So, now your defending Democrat (ie socialist) scum like Wellstone as "good guys". No wonder you can so easily come to the defense of Kolbe and McCain. Again, I remind you that this is a conservative forum, not a liberal one. Go defend your liberal icons somewhere else.
Recently, the UCONN college republicans were commended for the respect they showed Cindy Sheehan.
I gave Cindy Sheehan more respect than she deserves when she was in front of the White House in October doing all that she can for the islamofascist enemy. I calmly condemned her and her disgraceful activities, especially that she tramples all over the grave, the memory, and the honor of her fallen soldier son to advance an anti-American political agenda. Then, when she and her communist buddies were doing their "die in" on the sidewalk, I was taunting her and the rest of the maggot-infested traitors and giving them hell. They deserved far worse.
I don't know why you insist upon "playing nice" with the enemy. I refuse to tolerate the spread of socialism/communism/collectivism as it has lead to the deaths of over 100 million human souls over the last century. I refuse to tolerate the murder of hundreds of millions of infants by abortion that has occurred over the last century. I refuse to tolerate the invasion of America by foreign, criminal invaders and terrorists. And I have next to no tolerance for those who enable any of this or those who, like you, serve as useful idiots for these causes.
I'm surprised the "adults" on FR feel free to engage in the personal attacks on people who are on our side.
Deviant, open borders, pro-infanticide, globalist RINO Kolbe may be on YOUR side, but he's not on my side and not on the side of most of the CONSERVATIVES on this conservative forum.
The fact that he disagrees with you on abortion and immigration does not mean he is scum.
Now if you can prove the following
"I would expect as much from a Democrat, but someone who is an "honorable" Republican should not campaign purely upon lies and deception. Kolbe did. He is a liar. He is scum."
I may change my opinion of Kolbe.
Another thing, I liked Moynihan. I don't like Bill or Hill, Teddy, Pelosi, Reid, Boxer, etc. Those people are out to destroy the US because they don't like it. Wellstone and Moynihan's were misguided but decent men.
bttt
Is the abortionist taking a human life when he performs an abortion? Is the fully viable infant killed in a partial birth abortion not a human life? If disagree with either, then you can't possibly understand why someone who does support, tolerate, or condone abortion could be scum. But, simply, they are - and far worse. Monster is another appropriate term.
Now if you can prove the following "I would expect as much from a Democrat, but someone who is an "honorable" Republican should not campaign purely upon lies and deception. Kolbe did. He is a liar. He is scum." I may change my opinion of Kolbe.
Kolbe's lies were legion during the last campaign. He said that Graf wanted to take the elderly's prescription coverage away. He said that Graf wanted to fire all the firefighters, police, teachers, and people from a number of other emotion-laden public service careers. He said that Graf was "unpatriotic" in a time of war because Graf turned upside down a personal photo of himself and Pres. Bush on the day that Bush announced his support for another scamnesty for criminal invaders. He engaged in a whispering campaign of lies about Graf's employment history. Another whispering campaign stated that a vote for Graf was a vote to have BRAC close the military installations when, in fact, Kolbe had NOTHING to do with the impartial BRAC process - or if he did he was engagin in unethical and probably illegal activity. I saw it all and I was more than disgusted by it. Kolbe is scum.
Another thing, I liked Moynihan. I don't like Bill or Hill, Teddy, Pelosi, Reid, Boxer, etc. Those people are out to destroy the US because they don't like it. Wellstone and Moynihan's were misguided but decent men.
Kolbe's open borders idiocy after 9/11, his support for the murders of MILLIONS of American infants, and his support for the Clinton Global Initiative and other globalist schemes marks him as someone out to destroy the U.S. too. He's misguided and is not "decent" by any definition of the word.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.