Now that the Patriot Act has been gutted by the Senate, however, plots like those cited above will presumably proceed to their successful completion.And who will the media blame when we have another attack? Hint not the New York Slimes and the senate
1 posted on
12/17/2005 6:40:17 AM PST by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Just an observation, but taking away freedom is indeed an effective way to increase security--from everyone but the enforcers, at least. I'm all in favor of taking away terrorists' freedom. What troubles me is that there's no guaranteed way to take freedom away from the bad guys without taking it away from good guys as well.
2 posted on
12/17/2005 6:46:44 AM PST by
Shalom Israel
(Well, I got better...)
To: Kaslin
Many of the DemoRats who want to weaken or repeal the Patriot Act have also said that we are no safer as a result of the war on terrorism. So let's see, they think we are no safer, but they want to weaken our security anyway? The DemoRats are insane with hatred of the President. They think Bush is the enemy, not the terrorists. The DemoRats are a threat to our security.
4 posted on
12/17/2005 6:51:08 AM PST by
pleikumud
To: Kaslin
Is there a list of the votes cast by senators?
To: Kaslin
The Patriot Act was extended to the war on meth.
This made the act a pile of rubbish.
Come back with a bill aimed squarely at terrorist, and include a provision to bar anyone (and their supervisors) who uses the act for any other purpose, from ever receiving a cent from taxpayers. No pay check, no pension, nothing.
Nothing wrong with going after the terrorist and showing no mercy in the process.
6 posted on
12/17/2005 6:51:47 AM PST by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: Kaslin
Why didn't the President go on national televison in prime time before the vote to state these facts? and ask people to call there senators and encourage them to vote for renewal?
To: Kaslin
They will not blame the Democrats who voted to restore the Gorelick Wall.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
11 posted on
12/17/2005 7:04:43 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Kaslin
Now that the Patriot Act has been gutted by the Senate, however, plots like those cited above will presumably proceed to their successful completion. The Dems are hoping for that because they think they'll get their power back
They are playing games with American lives
12 posted on
12/17/2005 7:06:31 AM PST by
Mo1
(Message to Democrats .... We do not surrender and run from a fight !!)
To: Kaslin
Note to self: Three that we know of have been stopped. Now that we hamstring efforts, this means that the next one, which could well occur under Bush's watch thanks to this, will be blamed on Bush, when in fact it will be because of the Democratic strategy.
16 posted on
12/17/2005 7:32:37 AM PST by
combat_boots
(Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
To: Kaslin
Perhaps a compromise can be worked out. Perhaps they can extend the patriot act for red states and let it expire for the blue states...then we will have side by side examples of rather it's a good thing or a bad thing. If there are no terrorist attacks in blue states then the patriot act was not needed...if blue states get attacked then they are simply facing the consequences of choosing defeatocrats as representatives.
19 posted on
12/17/2005 8:02:40 AM PST by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: Kaslin
I'm just happy that we're allowing sharp objects back into the passenger compartments of our airliners.
Smart thinking.
22 posted on
12/17/2005 8:49:57 AM PST by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: Kaslin
Without a sunset clause, I'm glad it was not passed. The Patriot Act needs to be parsed out. The less onerous parts passed on their own merits and made permanent (i.e. removing Gorelicks wall). The more controversial parts made provisional and subject to periodic review and renewal if neccesary.
23 posted on
12/17/2005 9:10:36 AM PST by
PsyOp
(The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
To: Kaslin
If that's the case, then Bush should tell the voters all that and then get another vote in the Senate.
24 posted on
12/17/2005 9:20:45 AM PST by
dr_who_2
To: Kaslin
Stop using facts! It's all about how we FEEEEEEL!!!
//SARCASM ALERT//
33 posted on
12/17/2005 10:35:02 AM PST by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: Kaslin
And who will the media blame when we have another attack? Hint not the New York Slimes and the senate Yep. There is already precedent. It's called the 9-11 commission report. Backed by the anti-america MSM, they covered up Clinton era malfeasance and turned the spotlight on Bush's nine month old administration. Bush played along by covering up Able Danger. WALA! All government failure covered up nicely, citizens completely duped.
36 posted on
12/17/2005 10:44:34 AM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(De gustibus non est disputandum.)
To: Kaslin
According to a CNN report in October, the list of plots foiled thanks to the Patriot Act includes: A CNN report? Huh? What did I miss? I'll bet that person got fired...
40 posted on
12/17/2005 11:02:02 AM PST by
CommandoFrank
(Peer into the depths of hell and there you will find the face of Islam...)
To: Kaslin
I understand we've already got much of the Patriot Act legislation...this act goes after terrorist...why are we just hearing about this act...and not other legislation that's as intrusive?
41 posted on
12/17/2005 11:36:55 AM PST by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: Kaslin
The prevention of these are what Dingy Harry just bragged about killing. (the original story is still in the sidebar)
45 posted on
12/17/2005 2:17:47 PM PST by
Christian4Bush
("The only 'new tone' we hear should be that of the Left's telephone being disconnected. " dogcaller)
To: Kaslin; All
47 posted on
12/17/2005 4:58:44 PM PST by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: Kaslin
The alleged "hijacking" plots subsequent to 9/11 don't pass the giggle test. That plan just can't work now that the old assumption (a hijacker is a clown who wants a free ride to Cuba, and the smart thing for passengers to do is nothing) has been replaced by the new one (a hijacker is a terrorist who intends to kill everyone on board, and the smart thing for the passengers to do is rush him and stomp him into gelatin).
Only somebody who believes DUmmie conspiracy theories about what "really happened" on Flight 93 could buy these claims.
50 posted on
12/19/2005 9:28:38 PM PST by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson