Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trent Lott sues insurance company over loss of Pascagoula home
Sun Herald ^ | 12-12-5 | ANITA LEE

Posted on 12/16/2005 4:33:38 AM PST by WKB

GULFPORT - U.S. Sen. Trent Lott and wife Tricia are suing State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. over its refusal to cover the loss of their Pascagoula home to Hurricane Katrina.

The Lotts' suit, filed today in U.S. District Court, accuses the insurance company of fraud for denying coverage based on a "flood" exemption and asks that the court order the claim paid. It further asks that the insurance company be prohibited from using the flood exemption to deny coverage.

Attorney Richard "Dickie" Scruggs is representing his sister and brother-in-law in the lawsuit.

The Lotts paid insurance premiums for more than 40 years, according to the lawsuit, believing they would be covered for all losses caused by a hurricane. Katrina left a slab where their waterfront home once stood.

Homeowner's insurance policies in Mississippi and other states cover wind damage but typically include language to exclude flood damage, whether or not it is caused by wind-driven water.

The lawsuit argues that the storm surge was part of the hurricane and can't be considered flooding. It also points out that, under established law in Mississippi, when wind is considered to the "proximate" cause of damage, a claim should be paid even if other factors contributed to the loss.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: katrina; lawsuit; pascagoula; trentlott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-365 next last
To: chris1

It happened by the thousands last year in Florida. He should have had flood insurance living on the water. The same reasoning was given to tens of thousands of Florida residents. Why can't the same rules apply to ol' Trent? He certainly could afford it.


21 posted on 12/16/2005 4:50:51 AM PST by poobear (Imagine a world of liberal silence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WKB
He opted for the cheaper insurance knowing that there was other more expensive policies that covered flood damage out there.
Heck I know that and I live in Indiana!
22 posted on 12/16/2005 4:53:35 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

We live on the water and wouldn't think of NOT having flood insurance. Wonder why Trent didn't?


23 posted on 12/16/2005 4:54:26 AM PST by jch10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jemian

I've heard that Dickie Scruggs was John Grisham's model for his book KING OF TORTS. Anybody know if that's true? Scruggs, I believe, was one of the lead plaintiff attorneys in the huge tobacco cases and made MEGA-MEGA BUCKS.


24 posted on 12/16/2005 4:54:55 AM PST by Neville72 (uist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WKB

If he wins, there's hope for my sister and her husband. Same thing happened to their home in Ocean Springs. They had a concrete block house on a concrete slab, and after the 35' storm surge hit it, all that was left was 20" of sand on the slab. They found a piece of a wall in the lot next door, and another 1/2 mile away on St. Andrews Golf Course. I don't think she's found any more of it. She's been digging in the sand, and walking the road, since a week after the hurricane, and has found a few of her things. The thing she was most pleased to find was the quilt she had made, with our siblings contributions of fabric squares, for our Mama's 75th birthday. It is stained now, and has a tiny tear, but otherwise, is fine.


25 posted on 12/16/2005 4:56:48 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

I pay flood insurance because a corner of my property is within the 100-Year-Line. I pay the same rate as some yahoo who builds his entire home 2 feet above sea level in a hurricane zone.

Fact is, the Federal Flood Insurance Program was a huge subsidy to folks living on the Gulf Coast. They were protected from entirely predictable losses at rates far less than any market or risk based insurance company could affort to offer. Homeowners like me have been required by our mortgage companies to foot the bill for these guys and rebuild mansions in Florida, because everybody pays the same.

But Trent Lott did not want to take the gift. He was offered heavily subsidized insurance, but instead chose to put the premium money in his own pocket instead. Dumb move, Trent. You gamed the system one step to far, and now you are left holding the bag.


26 posted on 12/16/2005 4:57:37 AM PST by gridlock (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: chris1

The federal government REQUIRES me to carry flood insurance in Florida to cover my mortgage. The fact that he didn't have flood insurance means he owns the home outright and didn't want to pay the less than $100.00 per month for flood insurance. He lives in a tidal zone in Mississippi. He should not be relying on lawyers to save his cheap butt.


27 posted on 12/16/2005 4:58:21 AM PST by bessay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Welcome Senator to the real world.


28 posted on 12/16/2005 4:59:09 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

ZOT, Trent. Should have shelled out for the flood insurance. Laws are for other people, right?


29 posted on 12/16/2005 5:01:32 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Dick Cheney never trims his own nails. He simply stares at them until the tips melt off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Seems to me that if all he had left was a slab it could be argued that it was wind damage that destroyed the home. The fact that water was also present would seem to be irrelevant. What caused the house to be destroyed, wind or water.
30 posted on 12/16/2005 5:02:22 AM PST by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
Trent Lott is a typical idiot, who thinks that "the fact that he paid insurance premiums for years" automatically invalidates a CONTRACT which clearly eliminates tidal surge/flood. State Farm sent him a policy EVERY YEAR, and the fact that he was too lazy to read it does not establish fault on the part of State Farm. Furthermore, if he was a sophisticated property owner, he had to have talked to people and know that flood was excluded. I don't write much insurance at the beach here in NC, but you had better believe that EVERY propertyowner knows that flood is excluded. They all ask me, they all price it, and most of them decline unless the bank demands it.

I make them sign a declination on flood insurance if they are within 3 miles of the beach because I don't want them wailing and playing the victim when their house is washed away by tidal surge and they start playing the same kind of irresponsible games that Lott is now playing. Lott is just playing power games like any scumbag politician.

31 posted on 12/16/2005 5:02:55 AM PST by chronic_loser ((Handle provided free of charge as flame bait for the neurally vacant.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear

"It happened by the thousands last year in Florida. He should have had flood insurance living on the water. The same reasoning was given to tens of thousands of Florida residents. Why can't the same rules apply to ol' Trent? He certainly could afford it."

Should read..."the lobbyists could afford it."


32 posted on 12/16/2005 5:03:25 AM PST by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Storm surge is part of the hurricane system. If the hurricane had not been there, the storm surge would not have happened. STORM surge, not tidal wave, not a dam breaking, not a river overflowing its banks. It was part and parcel of the hurricane. The insurance company was wrong earlier, it was wrong in the other parts of the states and it is wrong now in Mississippi. If Oklahoma had a hurricane with the storm surge associated with it, the home owners have a right after paying the premiums for years should be covered. I don't see how a storm surge can be separated from the hurricane. It is part of the system.
33 posted on 12/16/2005 5:03:49 AM PST by Jemian (Santa is wearing desert camouflage and delivering freedom in Iraq. ~ Sgt. Joshua Howser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chris1

"What bums. This guy pays the pemiums for years and dumped on."

Lott is the bum. No insurance policy in the country protects from flooding. Says so in his policy, which he should have read 40 years ago, and every year since! If you live in a flood zone, you must by federally-subsidized flood insurance. Which you can get through State Farm, btw.


34 posted on 12/16/2005 5:03:52 AM PST by Old Student (WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater

Certainly he would have known there is flood protection because he was in a flood plain? And I would imagine he could afford private flood protection.

I mean he does work in and around the federal government ;)


35 posted on 12/16/2005 5:03:53 AM PST by stopem (Merry CHRISTmas to ALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bessay

Unfortunately, Trent is right in his assumption that a MS jury will side with the local boy and choose to soak the other 49 states, no matter what the policy says. They've been gaming the system for so long down there, it is second nature. He'll get his fat cat lawyer, he'll sue and he'll win.

And folks like you and me will see our insurance rates double, because we have to pay for some moron to re-build his mansion in Mississippi below sea level. And we'll keep paying until that mansion is washed away again, and our insurance rates will double again.


36 posted on 12/16/2005 5:04:21 AM PST by gridlock (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So

Lott


37 posted on 12/16/2005 5:08:30 AM PST by mcg2000 (New Orleans: The city that declared Jihad against The Red Cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WKB

If Trent wanted flood insurance then he should have purchased it.
He is acting like the typical "I don't care what the contract says, I want to have my butt covered" weasel.


38 posted on 12/16/2005 5:08:30 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

I would like to live somewhere with an ocean view but I know I can't afford it, so why should I be charged extra premium just because those who do enjoy the view and can afford to pay but refuse to pay the premium.


39 posted on 12/16/2005 5:09:20 AM PST by zipp_city
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neville72
<> And surprise surprise Dickie and Trentie are related by marriage. Probably only John could say for sure to your question. Also Dickie was extremely rich prior to the tobacco lawsuit due to asbestos class action suits. Dickie is nothing but idolized trash and Trent continues to disappoint. Oh and I beleive Dickie intends to have a hurricane Katrina related class action suit.
40 posted on 12/16/2005 5:11:06 AM PST by gbaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-365 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson