Skip to comments.
NYT FRIDAY: Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the NSA has monitored international calls ...
Drudge Report ^
| 12/15/2005
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 12/15/2005 6:05:45 PM PST by One_who_hopes_to_know
NYT FRIDAY: Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the NSA has monitored international calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants... MORE...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; ciatraitors; leak; newyorktimes; nyslimes; senateintelcommittee; slimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
We need to quit messing around with the penny ante Valerie Plame "crime" and get serious about prosecuting the leaks of the overseas prisons and this NSA store.
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
I'm not entirely sure this is a leak. All of this stuff keeps coming from "anonymous sources." An anonymous sources is Constitutionally protected information, even in the investigation of a crime.
Now think for a second. You're a left-wing MSM reporter. It's a slow news day. You have carte blanche to make up sources. What do you do?
2
posted on
12/15/2005 6:07:32 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
3
posted on
12/15/2005 6:08:07 PM PST
by
msnimje
(http://weblogawards.org/2005/12/best_blog.php .. VOTE FOR MALKIN (everyday) -- DON'T LET KOS WIN!!)
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
The Bush admin should find the mole and have a special bar-b-que, Texas style.
4
posted on
12/15/2005 6:08:11 PM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
I would have assumed that any international call or email was subject to interception by the NSA. Gawd, I'd hope so.
5
posted on
12/15/2005 6:08:39 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
When are our Intel Agencies both domestic and military going to start putting those who leak anything, into the slammer. This crap has to stop. If the agency directors do not take control and put a stop to this balony, then they should be fired the next frigen time anything leaks. No excuses period.
6
posted on
12/15/2005 6:09:10 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
But if this story is true, doesn't it bother you that these things are being done w/o a warrant? Whatever happened to the seperation of powers?
7
posted on
12/15/2005 6:10:11 PM PST
by
libertyman
("....It's [the Constitution] just a g-ddamned piece of paper" --Presidebt Bush, Nov. '05)
To: Gordongekko909
If the reporter has no source ... how did he get the info? It is a prima facie leak.
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
I wonder if they can figure out how Nigeria has all that money and no way for the heirs to access it.
9
posted on
12/15/2005 6:11:34 PM PST
by
mnehring
(“Anybody who doesn’t appreciate what America has done and President Bush, let them go to hell”...)
To: Gordongekko909
Now think for a second. You're a left-wing MSM reporter. It's a slow news day. You have carte blanche to make up sources. What do you do? Paging Jayson Blair. Jayson Blair to the front desk of the New York Slimes, please.
10
posted on
12/15/2005 6:12:00 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(We are RepubliCANs, not RepubliCAN'Ts.)
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
The CIA prefers to just leak their intelligence, beats THEM having to do anything about any of it...
30 years of PC liberal/communist infiltration has left our primary foreign intelligence agency ball-less and a world-wide joke.
11
posted on
12/15/2005 6:12:01 PM PST
by
wvobiwan
(It's OUR Net! If you don't like it keep your stanky routers off it!)
To: libertyman
Who do you think that Uncle Sam is listening to?
Most likely people who follow the R.O.P.
To: mnehrling
Oh they can explain that... just need a cc number
To: libertyman
Key word in the original article, international... falls under intelligence rules, no warrant needed. Warrant would be required if it were domestic.
14
posted on
12/15/2005 6:12:38 PM PST
by
mnehring
(“Anybody who doesn’t appreciate what America has done and President Bush, let them go to hell”...)
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
Everyone always assumes these leaks to the New York Times are coming from the CIA. But guess who held a closed-door intelligence meeting today?
The
Senate Committee on Intelligence. That's where Douglas Jehl from the New York Times seems to be getting most of his intelligence information, IMHO. His "bombshell" articles usually come out the day after a closed-door hearing of that committee.
To: libertyman
The powers are separated just fine, this has always been a function of the NSA.
16
posted on
12/15/2005 6:13:26 PM PST
by
wvobiwan
(It's OUR Net! If you don't like it keep your stanky routers off it!)
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
That's the point. He made it up.
17
posted on
12/15/2005 6:13:28 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
Sounds like Able Danger is alive and well!
GOOD!
18
posted on
12/15/2005 6:13:30 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
To: Dog Gone
Uhhh,this is a bad thing? I hear you.
19
posted on
12/15/2005 6:14:11 PM PST
by
WTSand
To: Gordongekko909
They are not reporters, they are propagandists...making up stories to fit their views is part of the job description.
20
posted on
12/15/2005 6:14:47 PM PST
by
dinok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson