Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US-Mexico border wall would be 'disgraceful': Fox
Reuters ^ | December 14, 2005

Posted on 12/14/2005 11:54:37 PM PST by West Coast Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Landmines it is, then.


21 posted on 12/15/2005 12:32:32 AM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TCats
Right. Somebody should point out to Brother Fox that, by his logic, locking the door to one's home could be construed as a violation of the rights of burglars.

When patently absurd reasoning by prominent political leaders isn't recognized and exposed for what it is, the level of political discourse sags ever lower.

22 posted on 12/15/2005 12:34:29 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FOG724; calcowgirl
RE: ...a proposal to build a high-tech wall on the U.S.-Mexico border to stop illegal immigrants.

"Fox, speaking in Tamaulipas state across the border from Texas, said such extreme security measures would violate immigrants' rights."

¡Qué huevos increíbles!


23 posted on 12/15/2005 12:35:20 AM PST by Seadog Bytes (Benedict Arnold was a 'war hero' too... before he became a TRAITOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seadog Bytes

So true.


24 posted on 12/15/2005 12:36:40 AM PST by Jigsaw John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
What in the HELL is wrong with our national government??

State Government, too. Now we're hooking up California and Mexico schools by video conferencing so they can practice their language skills and learn from each other; it looks like a quasi-merger of our school system! Oh, yeah. we're gonna help get Solar installed in Mexico, too! Check out the Governor's latest Radio Address.

(snip)

We saw two classes linked by videoconference where the students talked back and forth, shared ideas and improved their language skills. These are the first two sister schools but we are going to expand this program to as many schools as possible so more children from California and Mexico can learn from each other.

As we find new ways to bring the leaders of tomorrow together we are also working hard to solve the challenges we face today, challenges like expanding our economy.

That's why it's important to speed up the movement of goods across our border and build new economic partnerships like the one we're creating in high tech, between our Silicon Valley and the Silicon Border, or the steps we're taking to bring California solar technology to Baja to help them meet their energy needs.



25 posted on 12/15/2005 12:43:16 AM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Seadog Bytes

Grrr..... Just when I was hitting the hay and thinking 'happy thoughts', LOL.


26 posted on 12/15/2005 12:44:11 AM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Vicente Fox, your bloodsucking of our nation is disgraceful and shameful. Why don't you share some of your wealth with your countrymen so they don't keep breaking into our country to steal ours?


27 posted on 12/15/2005 12:46:04 AM PST by Bigg Red (Do not trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
US-Mexico border wall would be 'disgraceful': Fox
-----How does he know? We haven't even picked the wallpaper out yet ! (just kiddin) Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

28 posted on 12/15/2005 1:01:18 AM PST by WasDougsLamb (I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Cool, then he's okay with the pillboxes?


29 posted on 12/15/2005 1:05:31 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

...but getting shot and raped by additional illegals in our bedroom hides the disgrace, so it's no big deal... (sarc)


30 posted on 12/15/2005 1:57:15 AM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Left2Right

Maybe thats what it'll take to get the government to take action. Maybe it will actually take a volunteer group like the Minutemen to actually start building a wall, before the government will act. Like Thomas Jefferson said, if we were to rely on the federal government to tell us when to reap and when to sow, we would soon want bread.


31 posted on 12/15/2005 1:58:09 AM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

If I remember correctly weren't they the first ones to fire a shot in the Mexican-American War? Also, if I remember correctly, shortly thereafter, there is also the incident at the Alamo where Santa Anna could have won without firing a shot by starving them out, but declared that there was no honor without bloodshed. Hence went out the cry "Remember the Alamo!"


32 posted on 12/15/2005 2:03:04 AM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
The Mexican sixth-grade history book celebrates the troops who fought the Americans during the Mexican-American War. But "all the sacrifices and heroism of the Mexican people were useless," recounts the chronicle. The "Mexican people saw the enemy flag wave at the National Palace." The war's consequences were "disastrous," notes the primer: "To end the occupation, Mexico was obligated to sign the treaty of Guadeloupe-Hidalgo," by which the country lost half its territory to the United States.

Sounds pretty factual to me.

The Mexican War was probably the least-justified in American history, as pointed out by many politicians of the time, including A. Lincoln, who lost his seat in Congress for opposing it. Even many of the soldiers who fought in the war, such as US Grant, believed it to be unjustified aggression.

33 posted on 12/15/2005 2:12:03 AM PST by Restorer (Islamists want to die. We want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: old republic

Polk ordered American troops to occupy what was, at the least, disputed territory, then claimed that Mexico had invaded the US when it attacked these troops.

The battle at the Alamo took place during the Texas War of Independence, quite some time prior to the Mexican-American War.

The politicians in power in both countries were spoiling for a fight, largely for internal political reasons. They got one.


34 posted on 12/15/2005 2:17:42 AM PST by Restorer (Islamists want to die. We want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

Of course Polk also sent the troops into the disputed teritory without Congressional Authorization. Polk of course knew it would provoke a fight. It raises a question of Presidential War Powers. Can the President intentionally provoke a war without Congress' consent?


35 posted on 12/15/2005 2:26:12 AM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Hey, remember a few years back when Mexicans were calling for the U.S. to return the land from California to Texas back to Mexico? Can you imagine how much of a garbage dump this land would be if that happened?

Our greatest mistake is not taking over all of Mexico City when we captured it in 1847. The result would have been clean water, good jobs, better schools, a better government, and honorable officers from Seattle to Acapulco. The Mexicans would have been doing better, too. Too bad.
36 posted on 12/15/2005 2:32:13 AM PST by Ceewrighter (O'er the land of the free and the Home of the brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

FU Fox


37 posted on 12/15/2005 2:43:06 AM PST by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
"Fox, speaking in Tamaulipas state across the border from Texas, said such extreme security measures would violate immigrants' rights."

Obviously Fox misspoke, he meant "Illegal immigrants rights" LOL. Amen.
38 posted on 12/15/2005 2:47:28 AM PST by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WasDougsLamb

> US-Mexico border wall would be 'disgraceful': Fox

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it": George Santayana

"No! Don't throw me in that Briar Patch!": Brer Rabbit


39 posted on 12/15/2005 2:52:20 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: old republic
Can the President intentionally provoke a war without Congress' consent?

Well, he certainly can.

Polk did. Roosevelt was trying to provoke a war with Germany when Pearl Harbor took him off the hook.

Some (especially on this forum) argue that Lincoln did essentially the same thing.

40 posted on 12/15/2005 2:54:16 AM PST by Restorer (Islamists want to die. We want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson