Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pentagon Breaks the Islam Taboo--Islam is an ideological engine of war
Frontpagemagazine ^ | 12-14-05 | Paul Sperry

Posted on 12/14/2005 5:26:37 AM PST by SJackson

The government asks the forbidden question: How closely related is Islamic terrorism to mainstream Islam itself?

Washington's policy-makers have been careful in the war on terror to distinguish between Islam and the terrorists. The distinction has rankled conservatives who see scarce difference.

A little-noticed speech by President Bush in October gave them some hope. In a major rhetorical shift, he described the enemy as "Islamic radicals" and not just "terrorists," although he still denies that radicalism has anything to do with their religion.

Now for the first time, a key Pentagon intelligence agency involved in homeland security is delving into Islam's holy texts to answer whether Islam is being radicalized by the terrorists or is already radical. Military brass want a better understanding of what's motivating the insurgents in Iraq and the terrorists around the globe, including those inside America who may be preparing to strike domestic military bases. The enemy appears indefatigable, even more active now than before 9/11.

Are the terrorists really driven by self-serving politics and personal demons? Or are they driven by religion? And if it's religion, are they following a manual of war contained in their scripture?

Answers are hard to come by. Four years into the war on terror, U.S. intelligence officials tell me there are no baseline studies of the Muslim prophet Muhammad or his ideological or military doctrine found at either the CIA or Defense Intelligence Agency, or even the war colleges.

But that is slowly starting to change as the Pentagon develops a new strategy to deal with the threat from Islamic terrorists through its little-known intelligence agency called the Counterintelligence Field Activity or CIFA, which staffs hundreds of investigators and analysts to help coordinate Pentagon security efforts at home and abroad. CIFA also supports Northern Command in Colorado, which was established after 9/11 to help military forces react to terrorist threats in the continental United States.

Dealing with the threat on a tactical and operational level through counterstrikes and capture has proven only marginally successful. Now military leaders want to combat it from a strategic standpoint, using informational warfare, among other things. A critical part of that strategy involves studying Islam, including the Quran and the hadiths, or traditions of Muhammad.

"Today we are confronted with a stateless threat that does not have at the strategic level targetable entities: no capitals, no economic base, no military formations or installations," states a new Pentagon briefing paper I've obtained. "Yet political Islam wages an ideological battle against the non-Islamic world at the tactical, operational and strategic level. The West's response is focused at the tactical and operation level, leaving the strategic level -- Islam -- unaddressed."

So far the conclusions of intelligence analysts assigned to the project, who include both private contractors and career military officials, contradict the commonly held notion that Islam is a peaceful religion hijacked or distorted by terrorists. They've found that the terrorists for the most part are following a war-fighting doctrine articulated through Muhammad in the Quran, elaborated on in the hadiths, codified in Islamic or sharia law, and reinforced by recent interpretations or fatwahs.

"Islam is an ideological engine of war (Jihad)," concludes the sensitive Pentagon briefing paper. And "no one is looking for its off switch."

Why? One major reason, the briefing states, is government-wide "indecision [over] whether Islam is radical or being radicalized."

So, which is it? "Strategic themes suggest Islam is radical by nature," according to the briefing, which goes on to cite the 26 chapters of the Quran dealing with violent jihad and the examples of the Muslim prophet, who it says sponsored "terror and slaughter" against unbelievers.

"Muhammad's behaviors today would be defined as radical," the defense document says, and Muslims today are commanded by their "militant" holy book to follow his example. It adds: Western leaders can no longer afford to overlook the "cult characteristics of Islam."

It also ties Muslim charity to war. Zakat, the alms-giving pillar of Islam, is described in the briefing as "an asymmetrical war-fighting funding mechanism." Which in English translates to: combat support under the guise of tithing. Of the eight obligatory categories of disbursement of Muslim charitable donations, it notes that two are for funding jihad, or holy war. Indeed, authorities have traced millions of dollars received by major jihadi terror groups like Hamas and al-Qaida back to Saudi and other foreign Isamic charities and also U.S. Muslim charities, such as the Holy Land Foundation.

According to the Quran, jihad is not something a Muslim can opt out of. It demands able-bodied believers join the fight. Those unable -- women and the elderly -- are not exempt; they must give "asylum and aid" (Surah 8:74) to those who do fight the unbelievers in the cause of Allah.

In analyzing the threat on the domestic front, the Pentagon briefing draws perhaps its most disturbing conclusions. It argues the U.S. has not suffered from scattered insurgent attacks -- as opposed to the concentrated and catastrophic attack by al-Qaida on 9-11 -- in large part because it has a relatively small Muslim population. But that could change as the Muslim minority grows and gains more influence.

The internal document explains that Islam divides offensive jihad into a "three-phase attack strategy" for gaining control of lands for Allah. The first phase is the "Meccan," or weakened, period, whereby a small Muslim minority asserts itself through largely peaceful and political measures involving Islamic NGOs -- such as the Islamic Society of North America, which investigators say has its roots in the militant Muslim Brotherhood, and Muslim pressure groups, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose leaders are on record expressing their desire to Islamize America.

In the second "preparation" phase, a "reasonably influential" Muslim minority starts to turn more militant. The briefing uses Britain and the Netherlands as examples.

And in the final jihad period, or "Medina Stage," a large minority uses its strength of numbers and power to rise up against the majority, as Muslim youth recently demonstrated in terrorizing France, the Pentagon paper notes.

It also notes that unlike Judaism and Christianity, Islam advocates expansion by force. The final command of jihad, as revealed to Muhammad in the Quran, is to conquer the world in the name of Islam. The defense briefing adds that Islam is also unique in classifying unbelievers as "standing enemies against whom it is legitimate to wage war."

Right now political leaders don't understand the true nature of the threat,\ it says, because the intelligence community has yet to educate them. They still think Muslim terrorists, even suicide bombers, are mindless "criminals" motivated by "hatred of our freedoms," rather than religious zealots motivated by their faith. And as a result, we have no real strategic plan for winning a war against jihadists.

Even many intelligence analysts and investigators working in the field with the Joint Terrorism Task Forces have a shallow understanding of Islam.

"I don't like to criticize our intelligence services, because we did win the Cold War," says a Northern Command intelligence official. "However, all of these organizations have made only limited progress adjusting to the current threat or the sharing of information."

Why? "All suffer heavily from political correctness," he explains.

PC still infects the Pentagon, four years after jihadists hit the nation's military headquarters.

"A lot of folks here have a very pedestrian understanding of Islam and the Islamic threat," a Pentagon intelligence analyst working on the project told me. "We're getting Islam 101, and we need Islam 404."

The hardest part of formulating a strategic response to the threat is defining Islam as a political and military enemy. Once that psychological barrier has been crossed, defense sources tell me, the development of countermeasures -- such as educating the public about the militant nature of Islam and exploiting "critical vulnerabilities" or rifts within the Muslim faith and community -- can begin.

"Most Americans don't realize we are in a war of survival -- a war that is going to continue for decades," the Northcom official warns.

It remains to be seen, however, whether our PC-addled political leaders would ever adopt such controversial measures.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: cultofdeath; gwot; islam; islamism; islamofascism; jihad; jihadinamerica; kkkoran; koran; muslim; paulsperry; pentagon; quran; rop; sperry; stumblingonthetruth; terrorism; terrorist; trop; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: Fred Nerks
I see this rather, not as an admittance of past stupidity, but as the Pentagon signalling 'we have rid ourselves of the threat from Saddam, now we are ready to start on the enemy at home.'

Time to make Oriana Fallacis, Bat Yeors, Ibn Waraqs and Robert Spencers work required reading. ;o)

81 posted on 12/14/2005 2:12:53 PM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

We will not see an adoption of any measures against Islam. Our leaders and society are too drenched in PC'ism to pull their heads out of their asses and tell the truth. It will not be said, untill it is close to too late...


82 posted on 12/14/2005 2:33:49 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I think I will bump this thread everysingle day, at least a dozen times until the war starts... The amount of time I spend everyday on FR, will ensure this thread's appearence several times everyday. You're about to be the new leader in thread posts....and yes, i know of the one that is around 35,400 +...


83 posted on 12/14/2005 2:45:23 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; verity; humblegunner; hiredhand; Eaker; wardaddy; starfish923; New Dog; Larry Lucido; ...

Ya'll see this??


84 posted on 12/14/2005 3:11:43 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Thank God. The first step in achieving victory is understanding the enemy. Going into Iraq did nothing to change or damage Islam. Things will only begin to get better after the West gets over its PC squeemishness and addresses the reality of what Islam is.


85 posted on 12/14/2005 3:24:52 PM PST by ValenB4 ("Every system is perfectly designed to get the results it gets." - Isaac Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USF

"Time to make Oriana Fallacis, Bat Yeors, Ibn Waraqs and Robert Spencers work required reading. ;o)"

Yep. Or make a movie of THE LIFE OF MOHAMMAD from the book by Edward, Canon Sell, published in 1913, (link to free pdf on My Page...)a biography that clearly shows how and when and why the 'prophet' uttered his 'revelations from allah' just at the time when it suited him to break a cultural law to gain more booty and more females for himself...by killing and robbing his own kin and slaughtering the menfolk of the tribe of Jews that gave him shelter.

THE LIFE OF MOHAMMAD has it all, sex and crime and violence. It should do very well at the box office. It could be made in Australia, we have more than 500,000 thousand feral camels and lots of sand dunes, LOL!

(Are you listening, Mel?)


86 posted on 12/14/2005 3:25:31 PM PST by Fred Nerks (Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf download - link on My Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Today we are confronted with a stateless threat that does not have at the strategic level targetable entities: no capitals, no economic base, no military formations or installations," states a new Pentagon briefing paper I've obtained. "Yet political Islam wages an ideological battle against the non-Islamic world at the tactical, operational and strategic level. The West's response is focused at the tactical and operation level, leaving the strategic level -- Islam -- unaddressed."

Go read The Belmont Club's "Netwar"

http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2005/11/netwar.html

87 posted on 12/14/2005 3:48:38 PM PST by mpreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

bttt...


88 posted on 12/14/2005 4:24:46 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Flag your list in here...this is important to get out.


89 posted on 12/14/2005 4:27:17 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Flag your list in here...this is important to get out.


90 posted on 12/14/2005 4:28:10 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

Flag your list in here...this is important to get out.


91 posted on 12/14/2005 4:28:48 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
All:

I posted the following to Free Republic years ago. As good as the mind of Ann Coulter is on other matters, her advice to forcibly convert all Islamics to Christianity is not good advice. It would go against our own American tenet and constitutional clause against establishment of religion and could instigate virtually perpetual religious wars around our planet. It would also set Christianity back to what it was in its earlier centuries: a conquering, brutal religion that sought to wipe out the Judaism that it assumed and tried to replace.

The answer, IMO, is to know the following about Islam and to practice for other countries what our foundation of America preaches: the First Amendment of our Constitution. ...freedom of religious expression but with no establishment of religion in government. Spread the best of what we have here--not what the first surviving settlers of America came to get away from (establishments, edicts and inquisitions of Catholicism in Europe).

Surah 003.110
YUSUFALI: Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted transgressors.
PICKTHAL: Ye are the best community that hath been raised up for mankind. Ye enjoin right conduct and forbid indecency; and ye believe in Allah. And if the People of the Scripture had believed it had been better for them. Some of them are believers; but most of them are evil-livers.
SHAKIR: You are the best of the nations raised up for (the benefit of) men; you enjoin what is right and forbid the wrong and believe in Allah; and if the followers of the Book had believed it would have been better for them; of them (some) are believers and most of them are transgressors.

Surah 005.051
YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust.
PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for friends. They are friends one to another. He among you who taketh them for friends is (one) of them. Lo! Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk.
SHAKIR: O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

Surah 009.029
YUSUFALI: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
PICKTHAL: Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.
SHAKIR: Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

Surah 009.005
YUSUFALI: But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
SHAKIR: So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

Surah 005.033
YUSUFALI: The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;
PICKTHAL: The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom;
SHAKIR: The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement,

Here are some excerpts from the Hadith.

In the _Hadith_, also thought by Muslims to be inspired, they are told, "Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him" (Vol. 9:57), "No Muslim should be killed for killing a kafir [infidel]" (Vol 9:50), and "The person who participates in Jihad in Allah's cause and nothing compels him to do so except belief in Allah and His apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward or booty or will be admitted to paradise" (Vol 1:35).

And a following note.

According to Muslim scholars, Jihad can take the forms of "Jihad of Words," "Jihad of Deception," "Jihad of the Sword," "Jihad of Taxation and Financial Reward," "Jihad of Slavery," "Jihad of the Sharia Law," "Jihad of Polygamy" and "Jihad of the Spirits."
92 posted on 12/14/2005 4:36:03 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; humblegunner
Maybe they ought to clue President Bush in on this revelation.

Hell, just a coupla weeks ago somebody let him know that there is an illegal immigration problem. Been going on for months.........
93 posted on 12/14/2005 4:37:53 PM PST by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix or El Roy off of my ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

Ping your list in here...this is important to get out!!


94 posted on 12/14/2005 4:42:27 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: benjamin032

Thought you might want to read this one.


95 posted on 12/14/2005 5:11:56 PM PST by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

bttt...


96 posted on 12/14/2005 5:39:29 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: devolve; SJackson; dennisw; Travis McGee; Grampa Dave; potlatch; ntnychik; BOBTHENAILER
Well, gee, who the hell has led this country in avoiding the obvious?

Who is our commander-in-chief and why has he persisted in referring to a non-existent "religion of peace"?

Why has it taken him four years to get around to condemning "radical Islamism"?

Anyone who can read Dick and Jane and Spot can read jihad and fatwa and infidel.

Our Pentagon can't find Islam's center of gravity?


97 posted on 12/15/2005 1:07:44 AM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The West's response is focused at the tactical and operation level, leaving the strategic level -- Islam -- unaddressed."

"Most Americans don't realize we are in a war of survival -- a war that is going to continue for decades," the Northcom official warns.


Oh its not unaddressed. Its strategically addressed with a response of totally backing down by our President every time he spouts "Islam is a GREAT Religion of PEACE".

And as for war continuing for decades - that is ridiculous. It it continues that long, by then the enemy (ISLAM) will have 100 megaton bombs, gas, and every other weapon imaginable. If we are planning on war for decades, we are planning to lose.

Islam can not hurt us now, but by waiting decades, Islam will slaughter us. All this irrational purple finger exuberance is just buying time for Islam to attain technical parity with the West. That combined with immigration and birth rates does not put time on our side.

We should have used Nukes on 9/12. If the Shiites are not defeated and their constitution not rid of the "No Law Shall Contradict Islam" clause, we shall have suffered and died for the cause of Islam and not freedom.

Tagline:
98 posted on 12/15/2005 1:48:11 AM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

bttt


99 posted on 12/15/2005 4:26:37 AM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Thombo2
Just look at what Democracy has done to Christianity and you should gain hope that it will have a similar effect of Islam. No prayer in schools, no "One Nation under God" in the pledge, no Faith based organizations. Democracy will erode the effects of Islam over time. Unfortunately for us, Christianity doesn't preach violence to nonbelievers quite so loudly.
100 posted on 12/15/2005 5:18:24 AM PST by benjamin032
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson