Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buckyballs could disrupt functioning of DNA
New Scientist ^ | 12/09/2005 | Kurt Kleiner

Posted on 12/10/2005 11:50:27 AM PST by md2576

Computer simulations show that a common nanoparticle called a buckyball has the potential to damage DNA. The simulations suggest that buckyballs bind strongly to the DNA strands, distorting the molecules and interfering with functions like self-repair.

Researchers caution that the simulations do not prove that buckyballs actually do any damage in the real world. But the work does raise another concern about possible dangers of nanotechnology.

On Thursday, the US Environmental Protection Agency released a draft paper that called for more research into the safety of nanotechnology, saying that there are a number of unanswered questions about possible effects on health and the environment.

The worry is that even familiar materials, such as carbon, might have completely different health effects at the nanoscale. One recent study, for instance, found that buckyballs accumulate in the brains of largemouth bass and cause cell damage. Drug delivery

Buckyballs, or buckminsterfullerenes (C60), are hollow spheres made from 60 carbon atoms. Because of their unique physical properties they are being considered for many applications, from drug delivery to fuel cells.

Researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, and Vanderbilt University in Nashville, both in the US, decided to investigate how buckyballs would react if they came into contact with DNA. They used standard biomolecular simulation software to model two strands of DNA, with 12 base pairs each, interacting with two buckyballs over about 20 nanoseconds.

They found that the buckyballs bind strongly to DNA, with about the same energy that drugs bind to receptors on the surface of cells. When the buckyballs bound, they distorted the strands of DNA. Peter Cummings, a Vanderbilt chemical engineer, says it seems likely the interaction would interfere with the DNA's function, disrupting replication and repair and increasing mutation rates.

(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: buckyballs; dna; epa; nanotech; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2005 11:50:28 AM PST by md2576
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: md2576

There's already science fiction novels suggesting that nanotechnology can be used to kill people, or alter them. It's not all that farfetched.

But this is bad news for buckyball enthusiasts.


3 posted on 12/10/2005 11:56:41 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regicide
Cummings also notes that at present only a few grams of buckyballs are produced in the world every year, and that to err on the cautious side scientists treat them like toxic material.

 

This will not please Glenn Reynolds.

No, No it won't

4 posted on 12/10/2005 11:57:16 AM PST by md2576 (Merry RamaHanuKwanzMas! ..................Merry Christmas too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: md2576

5 posted on 12/10/2005 11:57:55 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
There's already science fiction novels suggesting that nanotechnology can be used to kill people, or alter them. It's not all that farfetched.

In the computer game Deus Ex it could be used both ways. The Gray Death nano-virus (central to the game's plot) was actually the same nanites that gave the Dentons their enhanced abilities. The only difference betwen nano-virus and nano augmentation was the propgramming of the nanites themselves.

6 posted on 12/10/2005 12:01:40 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: md2576

buckyballs ping


7 posted on 12/10/2005 12:01:51 PM PST by SideoutFred (Save us from the Looney Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: md2576

There goes all those nano-technology jobs...


8 posted on 12/10/2005 12:02:50 PM PST by TopDog2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
Most of James Alan Gardner's SF novels involve nanotechnology as a weapon or as a method of mutating biological forms.


9 posted on 12/10/2005 12:08:19 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TopDog2
All employees who handle hazardous materials need to understand the risks.

Time for a raise boss.

10 posted on 12/10/2005 12:08:46 PM PST by md2576 (Merry RamaHanuKwanzMas! ..................Merry Christmas too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: md2576
Ewww. Damaging people's DNA at the molecular level. It wouldn't be pretty.
11 posted on 12/10/2005 12:16:03 PM PST by manwiththehands (Happy RamaHanuKwanzMas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Very cool. I will have to check those out. The novel I am writing features it pretty heavily too. The enemy uses a nano-virus weapon and the only cure to it is a nano-counter-virus or a high dose of ionizing radiation.


12 posted on 12/10/2005 12:16:20 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: md2576
I hate buckyballs. I've always hated buckyballs.

Mostly it's the name.

13 posted on 12/10/2005 12:19:12 PM PST by Lazamataz (Liberals screwed again: HOLIDAY derives from the words Holy Day. NOW what will they do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands
... but then again ... messing with people's DNA at the molecular level might be our next step in EVOLUTION!

Continue with the Buckyball research!

Mutations for Darwin!
Mutations for Darwin!

14 posted on 12/10/2005 12:19:55 PM PST by manwiththehands (Happy RamaHanuKwanzMas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: md2576

This time of year talk usually turns to Shweaty Balls.


15 posted on 12/10/2005 12:20:39 PM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: md2576
I don't buy it.

All kinds of activists are opposed to nanotechnology, because it will be a huge money-maker in the very long term. Activists of this type act as a kind of social troll who loudly castigates productive folks who go tramping on his bridge. He does this with the aim of getting paid, somehow (he calls it oversight, or conducting a study). And then this troll asks to get thanked for playing this expensive and unproductive role.

Think of the troll as a kind of progress "toll taker".

Activists like this also fear nanotechnology because they don't understand it. And they don't understand much, come to think of it...

16 posted on 12/10/2005 12:23:32 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

Hey you stole my tagline! LOL


17 posted on 12/10/2005 12:24:48 PM PST by md2576 (Merry RamaHanuKwanzMas! ..................Merry Christmas too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: md2576
I forgot:

When genetically modified foods came out, they trundled out this Scottish nut to allege that genetically-modified corn would accumulate in the gut of butterflies, thereby killing them.

Basically a shrewd re-hash of, Silent Spring.

Of course, it was all BS, and it is a fact that about 80% of all US food is somehow genetically modified.

Yes --80%.

18 posted on 12/10/2005 12:26:26 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Mark Wiesner, an environmental engineer at Rice University in Houston, says that it will take experiments with actual buckyballs and DNA to tell whether the simulations hold up.

Makes me wonder why they have not done this already.

19 posted on 12/10/2005 12:28:26 PM PST by md2576 (Merry RamaHanuKwanzMas! ..................Merry Christmas too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I met Bucky Fuller twice in Maine. The first time was when my mother-in-law's lobster boat went up on a shoal by Bear Island in Penobscot Bay. We were rescued and after the tide rose pulled off by another lobster boat containing Bucky Fuller, Doctor Spock (the pediatrician, not the alien), Walter Cronkite, and Eliot Porter.

We went in to their dock to check our boat out because there was a smell of gasoline. When they pushed us off for the return journey, Bucky reached out and gave the boat a delicate little spin, so as it drifted out from the dock it turned around, and was headed toward the harbor entrance when I started the engine. He clearly had a good spatial sense.


20 posted on 12/10/2005 12:33:03 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson