Gang rapist claims right to assault

Sydney Morning Herald (Australia) ^ | December 10, 2005 | Natasha Wallace

[grey_whiskers]

Hmm, Nov. 15, 2005.

Welcome to FR.

This crime had nothing to do with Pakistani "culture". It had to do with thugs who were caught, and then tried to justify their crimes. Just as every criminal does.

The problem is Pakistani culture insofar as it is Mooselimb, sharia-dominated, makes it far easier to commit rape with impunity, even IF the woman screams bloody murder, the standards for proof are almost impossible to meet, either physically (how many rapes are done in front of four witnesses) or socially (if you can't prove your accusation of rape, YOU get punished--talk about adding insult to injury!).

At least in Western countries, it is not "heads I win, tales you lose" against the woman; even though there are other difficulties.

Nice try, though.

Cheers!

[paulat]

If you are going to argue what you have been arguing...I suggest you change your screen name. It is demeaning.

[grey_whiskers]

Out of context Biblical quotes deleted.

OK, so you're a troll. Yawn.

[Lurker]

Mohammed was a syphilitic pedophile.

L

[grey_whiskers]

instantgratification (TROLL) wrote: And as for standing and watching during a gang rape, that happens pretty much everywhere.

He must have some sick friends...or hobbies.

[instantgratification]

In Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, rape is relatively rare. Far, far less prevalent than in North America or the UK. That is the same in Scandinavia and Denmark. It just doesn't happen. So, it does not surprise me that rapes would be carried out by foreigners.

In the Soviet period, 99% of the rapes in Kyiv (where I lived) were committed by men from the Caucasus - usually Georgians or Armenians.

Into the 1980's, in large cities, mothers used to leave babies and toddlers in carriages outside stores unattended. Same with many parts of Europe. The idea that a child could be snatched was virtually unheard of.

So yes, it could be cultural. But it has more to do with macho cultures than with Islam. Among the Muslim Minangkabau, rape is unheard of.

[grey_whiskers]

Education and understanding of the "other" is what is needed.

Where's that "Everything I needed to know about Islam I learned on 9-11" link when you need it?

Again, nice try, troll.

[grey_whiskers]

The posts I've read here are venomous, and not too different from attitudes about Jews prior to WWII.

Krystalnacht vs. 9-11.

Hmm, no difference.

At least not to a troll.

[instantgratification]

You missed the point. Which was that anyone can quote a religious text out of context.

Islam is not a "death cult" religion. And what Muslims believe about Christ is irrelevant to me as a Christian.

I suggest you go back and study some more of the Bible from your heart. Because you have missed Christ's most important lessons.

[instantgratification]

Democracy is not a Judaic-Christian concept, either.

You should read about Andalusia.

[grey_whiskers]

I suggest you go back and study some more of the Bible from your heart. Because you have missed Christ's most important lessons.

"No man comes to the Father, but through ME" comes to mind.

Or even the Golden Rule...rape being something most of us would not want to experience.

Or-since you claimed in an earlier post to be Catholic--you could try reading Hilaire Belloc's The Great Heresies and see what he says about Islam.

But trolls tend not to be very thoughtful...

[instantgratification]

The point was in response to a previous post which stated basically the same thing about Islam.

[USF]

Considering there are over one billion Muslims, and far less than 100,000 fundamentalist Muslims willing to fight the West (and of that number, less than 20,000 belong to al Qaeda), I think you have it bass ackwards.

No, you do. Go read my # 57 again, and reply to it.

Note # 54 too.

and then, when you've answered that, see my questions #1-6 to you, from posts # 109, 111, 116 and 119.

1. Do you know what the bumiputra system is?

2. Do you know what inspires it?

3. Do you know who PAS is?

4. do you know how UMNO stays in power?

Or are you just full of hot air, quoting nations and things you know nothing about?

5. Do you know the significance of "513" in malaysia and the story behind it?

6: What do you see that is wrong with islam and what parts do you think they should change?

Please note The Danger of Bid’ah (Innovation) in your reply.

I eagerly await your reply to numbers 1-6.

[USF]

You should read about Andalusia.

You should read about the concept of the darul harb, troll.

[Fred Nerks]

What is Jihad: The Arabic word Jihad is derived from the root word Jahada (struggle). Jihad has come to mean an offensive war to be waged by Muslims against all non-Muslims to convert them to Islam on the pain of death. Jihad is enjoined on all Muslims by the Quran.

This site brings you the history of the Islamic Jihad from a neutral and factual viewpoint.

Site Map

The Jihad against Arabs (622 to 634)

The Jihad against Zoroastrian Persians of Iran, Baluchistan and Afghanistan (634 to 651)

The Jihad against the Byzantine Christians (634 to 1453)

The Jihad against Christian Coptic Egyptians (640 to 655)

The Jihad against Christian Coptic Nubians - modern Sudanese (650)

The Jihad against pagan Berbers - North Africans (650 to 700)

The Jihad against Spaniards (711 to 730)

The Reconquista against Jihad in Spain (730 to 1492)

The Jihad against Franks - modern French (720 to 732)

The Jihad against Sicilians in Italy (812 to 940)

The Jihad against Chinese (751)

The Jihad against Turks (651 to 751)

The Jihad against Armenians and Georgians (1071 to 1920)

The Crusade against Jihad (1096 – 1291 ongoing)

The Jihad against Mongols (1260 to 1300)

The Jihad against Hindus of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (638 to 1857)

The Jihad against Indonesians and Malays (1450 to 1500)

The Jihad against Poland (1444 to 1699)

The Jihad against Rumania (1350 to 1699)

The Jihad against Russia (1500 to 1853)

The Jihad against Bulgaria (1350 to 1843)

The Jihad against Serbs, Croats and Albanians (1334 to 1920)

The Jihad against Greeks (1450 to 1853)

The Jihad against Albania (1332 - 1853)

The Jihad against Croatia (1389 to 1843)

The Jihad against Hungarians (1500 to 1683)

The Jihad against Austrians (1683)

Jihad in the Modern Age (20th and 21st Centuries)

The Jihad against Israelis (1948 – 2004 ongoing)

The Jihad against Americans (9/11/2001)

The Jihad against the British (1947 onwards)

The Jihad against the Germans (1945 onwards)

The Jihad against the Indians (1947 onwards)

The Jihad against the Filipinos in Mindanao(1970 onwards)

The Jihad against Indonesian Christians in Malaku and East Timor (1970 onwards)

The Jihad against Russians (1995 onwards)

The Jihad against Dutch and Belgians (2003 onwards)

The Jihad against Norwegians and Swedes (2003 onwards)

The Jihad against Thais (2003 onwards)

The Jihad against Nigerians (1965 onwards)

The Jihad against Canadians (2001 onwards)

The Jihad against Latin America (2003 onwards)

The Jihad against Australia (2002 onwards)

The Global Jihad today (2001 – ongoing)

The War on Terror against Jihad today (2001– ongoing

http://www.historyofjihad.org/persia.html

Pack rapes of young women in host coutries are nothing but an attempt to terrify the population into dhimmitude, the perpetrators don't think of the girls as human beings, they never apologise, they believe they have the right to rape and say so openly even in court. 'She's nothing but a slut' (because she went out at night with a girlfriend? Because she wears makeup and modern clothing?) Frankly, as an aussie, I care less about what they do to their own females. If it's truly cultural, then let them at it.
I DO OBJECT TO THE EPIDEMIC OF PACKRAPES IN OUR CAPITAL CITIES HOWEVER. ONE HOSPITAL SPOKESPERSON SAID THE NUMBER HAD REACHED EPIDEMIC PROPORTIONS.

http://www.hvk.org/articles/0104/64.html

http://www.time.com/time/europe/magazine/2002/1202/crime/bellil.htm

WHAT IS THIS? jihad against our young women?

[USF]

Re my # 54 # 57 again... re-read them. Once again, I ask you if you just full of hot air, quoting nations and things you know nothing about?

See my questions #1-6 to you, from posts # 109, 111, 116 and 119.

1. Do you know what the bumiputra system is?

2. Do you know what inspires it?

3. Do you know who PAS is?

4. do you know how UMNO stays in power?

Or are you just full of hot air, quoting nations and things you know nothing about?

5. Do you know the significance of "513" in malaysia and the story behind it?

6: What do you see that is wrong with islam and what parts do you think they should change?

Please note The Danger of Bid’ah (Innovation) in your reply.

I eagerly await your reply to numbers 1-6.

And then you may want to address my questions to you regarding islamophobia.

[Mount Athos]

As an Amnesty International activist

That goes a very long way towards explaining why so you have so many misconceptions and incorrect facts. Welcome to FR, it is good that you are here to learn.

None of the terrorists who were drinking, or living openly with women were devoted to Islam.

This is again, utterly false. Read the diaries and letters of the islamist september 11th terrorists, with extensive exhortations to the koran, full of promise of the 72 virgin afterlife. They were absolutely islamist, and they drank alcohol.

There is a difference between a terrorist and an Islamist.

99% of the time today, there is no difference whatsoever, they are one and the same. The overwhelming majority of terrorists are islamist.

And, I never stated ONLY men face the death penalty.

Yes you did! Look at post #23, and your response in #27. When asked point blank whether it is the woman or man who faced the death penalty in rape cases, you only replied that men face the death penalty. That was the entirety of your misleading response. A dishonest half truth at best. Only when caught in this error did you repeat the caveats others had pointed out -- the harsh reality that women in Muslim countries face the death penalty for complaining about rape. Yet you incredibly say Muslim countries are on the cutting edge of womens rights. The cutting edge women face in muslim countries is gang rape at knife point.

Four witnesses are required to prove adultery by a woman against a man under sharia.

You are weaseling out of what you originally said, nice try. You had falsely claimed that four men are not required to prove rape by a woman against a man. Your exact words were, " No - The four witnesses are required to prove adultery, not rape." This wrong -- yet another falsehood you are perpetuating here. See post 99 for absolute proof that you are incorrect on this point.

I am very aware of the fact that where sharia is law, women do face the death penalty for adultery - even if they are raped.

Then why your misleading propagandist half truth suggestions that only men face the death penalty? (post #23 and 27) Though you know better, you are quite content to leave false positive impressions of islamic countries, and only back down with appropriate caveats with faced with an educated audience who knows the falseness of your claims.

[instantgratification]

Wrong. Four witnesses are required to prove adultery. It is the only crime in Islam, including Hadd crimes, which requires four witnesses.

[instantgratification]

I am happy to hear that - not the violence, just that it doesn't happen where you live.

There is a trial right now in my city where 3 men (1 juvy) are on trial for gang rape (and murder) of a 14 year old girl (and none of the perpetrators is a Muslim). And, I live in a fairly safe city.

[instantgratification]

One in five people on the planet is Muslim.

Care to prove where every one of them is a terrorist or terrorist sympathizer? Even in the Arab world, one of the top five concerns of their populations (after unemployment, healthcare, and the corruption of their leaders) is terrorism.