Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four Illinois pharmacists placed on leave because of pro-life practices (Walgreens)
Baptist Press ^ | Dec 5, 2005 | Tom Strode

Posted on 12/06/2005 9:50:04 PM PST by Former Military Chick

WASHINGTON (BP)--Four Illinois pharmacists have found out there is a price to pay for exercising their pro-life convictions.

The Walgreen Co. placed four of its pharmacists on indefinite, unpaid leave Nov. 28, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. The four, all working at Walgreen stores in the Illinois suburbs east of St. Louis, had declined to abide by a state rule that requires pharmacists to fill prescriptions for contraceptives, including the “morning-after” pill, even if it violates their consciences.

Many people with pro-life views consider the “morning-after” pill, also known as emergency contraception, to be an abortifacient because it not only restricts ovulation in a woman but it can act after conception. The method can block implantation of a tiny embryo in the uterine wall, thereby causing an abortion, pro-lifers point out.

Illinois is the only state to have a rule requiring pharmacists to dispense the “morning-after” pill. Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a Democrat who issued the rule earlier this year, said after the discipline of the four Walgreen pharmacists, “If a woman has a prescription for contraceptives, they ought to be filling that,” the Post-Dispatch reported.

A Walgreen spokesman told the Post-Dispatch the pharmacists could transfer to a store in Missouri, where such a policy is not in effect.

John Menges, 39, who was removed from his position at an Edwardsville, Ill., store, said it is only a matter of time before Missouri has a rule that “takes away his religious freedoms.”

“I’m not going around the country running from this,” he told the Belleville (Ill.) News-Democrat.

The pharmacists are hopeful the state’s conscience clause will protect them, according to the Bellevue newspaper.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved prescription use of two brands of the “morning-after” pill, Preven and Plan B. The FDA is considering whether it will permit over-the-counter sale of Plan B without a prescription to women 16 years of age and older.

The “morning-after” pill is basically a heavier dose of birth control pills. Under the regimen, a woman takes two pills within 72 hours of sexual intercourse and another dose 12 hours later.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conscienceclause; pharmacists; pharmacy; prolife; ru486; walgreen; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Walgreens is a private business, if their employee's do not do their job then let them go. Having said that if the company sells an item that you morally disagree with than find another pharmacy that is more in line with your beliefs.

If you are insured, than they should know if that pharmacy plans to not honor medications. I get frustrated with my insurance company, but I would not want an additional inconvenience tacked on of finding a pharmacy that will fill the prescription my physician gave me.

I am speaking broadly here, there are medications that pharmacies will not dispense either for moral reason's or for the safety of their other patients.

Either way, it is the patient who is getting short end of the stick.

I have no doubt this article will stimulate yet another excellent debate on Free Republic.

1 posted on 12/06/2005 9:50:06 PM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

And what happens if the pharmacy calls your insurance company, and the individual insurance rep on the line has a moral problem with a medicine you're taking and refusing to reimburse you? It's a dangerous road.


2 posted on 12/06/2005 9:55:15 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This is key... What business does government have in forcing such an atrocity?
3 posted on 12/06/2005 10:13:10 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

ping


4 posted on 12/06/2005 10:15:35 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (abortion is a weapon of mass destruction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

If a lib did something like this they would not be able to fire them because of 200 ACLU lawyers crowding the store.


5 posted on 12/06/2005 10:24:44 PM PST by GeronL (Leftism is the INSANE Cult of the Artificial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Here's your answer:

Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a Democrat who issued the rule earlier this year

He's passed a lot of things "under the table" since he's been in office, I am hopeful that this is but his ONLY term as governer!

6 posted on 12/06/2005 10:39:05 PM PST by blondee123 (Close our borders to illegals! Don't try to appease us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"Four Illinois pharmacists have found out there is a price to pay for exercising their pro-life convictions."

Or more to the point, they're paying a price for being Christians who want to practice what their Church teaches.

7 posted on 12/06/2005 10:55:27 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Interesting, we cannot say Christmas for fear of offending somebody and getting sued, but a employer can force you to kill a baby with impunity.

America has become a very strange place since it abandoned Christian morality.
8 posted on 12/06/2005 10:59:35 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Finally some good news about a company using common sense in how it deals with the public. Thank you Walgreen's. These four pharmacists should be fired as all others who try to impose their crazy anti abortion zealotry on a woman's right to control her own body. A pharmacist has No Right to decide which prescription he will or will not fill. If they cannot do that then they should find another line of work. I know the far right Christian people have some phobia about sex, but sex is something people like to have and there is absolutely nothing wrong with doing what an adult can legally do. Let me clue you into something : Contraceptives prevent pregnancy thereby eliminating the need for an abortion for an unwanted and unnecessary pregnancy. That is a good thing. Don't impose your religious morality on me or the woman I am with. Now you can attack me.


9 posted on 12/07/2005 12:52:36 AM PST by Italia222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Just imagine: "My sincere religious belief is that Protestants get ill only because they have not followed correct doctrine. As a Catholic, I refuse to give them any medications." Or switch the denominations around.

Would anyone be justified in such a refusal of medicine?

Sincerety of belief does not releave one of public duty and responsibility.

A pro-life or pro-choice electric company does not have the right to provide or withhold electricity based on their fetishes about who deserves service and who doesn't.

"Freedom of religion" in this case is a false front for anti-social behaviour.


10 posted on 12/07/2005 1:12:45 AM PST by thomaswest (Just Curious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Italia222
as all others who try to impose their crazy anti abortion zealotry on a woman's right to control her own body

How's a woman supposed to control her own body if her mummy kills her in the womb?

11 posted on 12/07/2005 4:46:48 AM PST by agere_contra (You are worthress, Arik Bawdrin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thomaswest
Would anyone be justified in such a refusal of medicine?

The difference is that the Pharmacist is being made an accessory to murder.

12 posted on 12/07/2005 4:49:51 AM PST by agere_contra (You are worthress, Arik Bawdrin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
"The difference is that the Pharmacist is being made an accessory to murder."

How far are you willing to take this? What if the prescription was filled on-line and mailed to the patient? Would the US Post Office and all of it's employees who were in the chain of custody be accessories to murder? I say fill the script or find a profession that doesn't go against your beliefs. No one is forced you to apply for employment at companies who legally fill prescriptions.

13 posted on 12/07/2005 6:50:31 AM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

These four pharmacists have been terminated from Wags for not following company policy. Fine. But, the company policy is to follow the law. And that is where the problem lies. The governor has installed an emergency ruling REQUIRING all pharmacists to dispense emergency contraception without delay. This law says nothing about religous or moral beliefs. Those problems we will always encounter, fine, so be it. But, please understand that a pharmacist who doesn't care about those beliefs and would dispense the pill regularly now has his hands tied to do his professional duty. I am a pharmacist, in illinois, and feel appalled that the governor is taking away my pharmacist duty of protecting the patient's safety. We are currently required to do a "prospective drug review" that means we look at other meds the doctor may not know about and her disease states, and current health status, and we then make a professional decision to dispense or intervene. That has been taken away by this quick tempered government. That is the REAL problem, not the religious beliefs. Those are just coming to light because of the primary problem.


14 posted on 12/07/2005 11:34:11 AM PST by ky_bjc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

15 posted on 12/07/2005 3:25:08 PM PST by cpforlife.org (Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blondee123

Wouldn't that IL woman gubernatorial candidate with the odd hyphenated name also support abortion pills?


16 posted on 12/07/2005 3:50:03 PM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Italia222
Let me clue you into something : Contraceptives prevent pregnancy thereby eliminating the need for an abortion

I have news for you... the morning-after pill IS NOT A CONTRACEPTIVE! It works by killing a unique human being, early in development, but a human being nonetheless. Contraceptives prevent fertilization, the morning-after pill kills an early embryo, and that's a major difference.

17 posted on 12/07/2005 3:53:35 PM PST by Former Fetus (fetuses are 100% pro-life, they just don't vote yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Italia222

Now you can attack me.




Nobody here wants to attack you like you want to butcher your unborn child. Further, it's not about sex - where did you get that bunch of baloney? It's about Christians being concerned with the most vulverable of people - the unborn kids.


18 posted on 12/07/2005 7:35:00 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

God bless them for not participating in the death of a baby!


19 posted on 12/07/2005 10:23:36 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thomaswest
You completely missed it. And religion really has nothing to do with it (an atheist could be against infanticides).

The key issue is a fascist governor forcing companies to provide something that will destroy another life. No different really than this governor demanding pharmacists to require dispensation of a date-rape drug.

Point is, medicines should be for healing, not destroying others lives.

20 posted on 12/07/2005 10:46:56 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson