Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Establishment Rallying Around RINO Senator Lincoln Chafee (R-RI)
The Boston Globe ^ | December 5, 2005 | Rick Klein

Posted on 12/06/2005 5:19:59 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

But with the Republican Party's hold on the Senate looking tenuous, the party of Wall Street and the religious right is suddenly chummy with its most prominent environmentalist. With a tough race looming, and a solid conservative challenging Chafee in the primary, Republican elites are sending checks to Rhode Island -- to help Chafee.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Rhode Island
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; actuallyademocrat; chafee; gopprimary; laffey; leftwinggoper; mediafavorite; msmrepublican; rino; rinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-237 next last
To: libertyman

Diogenes...get out your lamp. Good luck finding constitutionists!!!! I agree...we need to elect constitutionists to the FEDERAL house of reps....that was my point.


141 posted on 12/07/2005 1:08:14 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: aligncare

We won't lose to a foreign power.

We will fall from within, on our knees with a hand outstretched to nanny state in search of a government solution to our needs.


142 posted on 12/07/2005 1:10:48 PM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Non Sequitur.

Not so. Libertarianism and liberalism both have the same idea at their most basic levels: that an individual has the right to do anything, at any time, for any reason without limitation as long as "no one gets hurt" (at least not obviously).

The only difference between libertarians and liberals is over who gets to clean up the wreckage caused by such a radical notion of 'freedom' (otherwise known as license). For liberals, the federal government is responsible. For libertarians, no one is responsible.

Ronald Reagan--and the Founding Fathers for that matter--were not in either of these camps. They recognized that with freedom comes responsibility and would therefore have fit in most comfortably as Conservatives.
143 posted on 12/07/2005 1:13:40 PM PST by Antoninus (Hillary smiles every time a Freeper trashes Rick Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Tell me, Herr Antoninus, how do you propose to enforce your prohibition of sodomy between consenting adults when the act is performed in the privacy of their homes?

Will you install cameras throughout our houses?

Will you install a policeman in every house? What if the policeman is a Sodomite too or takes a bribe to turn a blind eye? Maybe you'll need two or more cops in every house to watch each other.

Will you issue government mandated chastity belts where sex can only occur under your watchful eye?

As far as I am concerned, let the Sodomites kill themselves with their sexual perversion. I don't care what they do in the privacy of their homes, but if there is a consequence for their acts, THEY SHOULD BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY.

Is that clear enough for you or do you want to distort that for your purposes too?


144 posted on 12/07/2005 1:24:17 PM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
The only difference between libertarians and liberals is over who gets to clean up

In AntoniusWorld:

* Ted Kennedy is sponsoring a bill to repeal all federal gun control laws.

* Cindy McKinney demands that private carriers be permitted to compete with the US Postal Service.

* Nancy Pelosi is working to get the government out of the education business.

* Howard Dean is lambasting the Administration for the gross inadequacy of its tax cuts. YEAAARGH!

Sounds like a nice place. What color is the sky there?

145 posted on 12/07/2005 1:24:42 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Badray
Maybe you'll need two or more cops in every house to watch each other.

But not too closely, if you take my meaning....

146 posted on 12/07/2005 1:25:32 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

LOL


147 posted on 12/07/2005 1:32:27 PM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Badray
I don't necessarily want the government to criminalize consentual beharious either, but up to a certain point: & that point is as long as those behaviors don't violate the God-given rights to life, liberty & pursuit of happiness of another person.

The federal government is VERY limited in it's criminal powers (please read what Thomas Jefferson said in The Kentucky Resolutions...that suns up federal criminal powers fairly well.

Now as for the states, I don't care which way they go: let a conservative state like Utah impose the death penalty for posessing a joint if the people there so desire; & let a liberal state like the People's Republic of California legalize EVERYTHING if they want to. Doing so would bring back the SELF-GOVERNMENT that the Founders believed was @ the heart of our FEDERAL system.

148 posted on 12/07/2005 1:35:27 PM PST by libertyman (It's HIGH time to make marijuana legal AGAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: aligncare

...results from ignorance and not from evil intent or even treachery or treason on the part of politicians, media or citizens....

I'll buy ignorance on the part of the citizens, and admit most of the media, while advancing an evil agenda, are just useless idiots as well as ignorant.

But the pols, even if this is true, do not deserve to be let off.

If I suddenly became exalted ruler, I'd hang them, except for a very very few.

The Media, I'd just put in a pit and bulldoze over them.
Even innocent, they don't merit redemption.

Then, I could go ahead rebuilding the citizenry into people who could rule themselves again, so that I could get back to my chosen life of isolated anonymity and peaceful obscurity.

I guess I could hire people like you to unignorize them.
Get me out of town quicker.


149 posted on 12/07/2005 1:38:42 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com ( Tranzis won't let you vote but they will let you pay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Badray

LOL....

Dontcha know officious meddling state sponsored busy bodies know what's best for each of us...all the time.....in every situation? Our finances....our bedrooms...our kitchens.....how much water belongs in our toilets......what kind of car we should drive.....what gas mileage it should get....the innoculations our children should have.....all should be controlled by those who know best.

Why do you question the will of the state? Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.


150 posted on 12/07/2005 1:42:28 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

These days I practice as a doctor and not a journalist.
But, you are right about an important point you made. America is Conservative and there is a market for not only real journalism, but for decent films for adults, films without cursing or sexual content. The market is there, and content providers are beginning to recognize that fact.


151 posted on 12/07/2005 1:52:17 PM PST by aligncare (Wasted my time...got my Journalism degree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
Thanks for the chuckle. You sounded just like me, ranting in front of the tv.
152 posted on 12/07/2005 1:55:19 PM PST by aligncare (Wasted my time...got my Journalism degree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: aligncare
LOL.....glad you enjoyed it. It really feels good to vent on occasion!!! ;-)!
153 posted on 12/07/2005 2:00:24 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
You surprise me sometimes with the level of disdain you have for politicians. And, while I agree with you and mourn with you for 'lost America', I'm just not sure it is wise to be so (angry?).
154 posted on 12/07/2005 2:30:14 PM PST by aligncare (Wasted my time...got my Journalism degree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
What a good laugh I had over your comments!

Just as in the Grand Jury, when it comes to elections, a ham sandwich can not only be indicted, but also elected to high office.
155 posted on 12/07/2005 2:40:46 PM PST by aligncare (Wasted my time...got my Journalism degree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
The party would be well advised to replace him in the primary, because principled conservatives are still LIVID, and would rather vote for a Dem than vote for Ricky.

Then find a principled conservative and support him. Supporting a Dem or failing to support the Republican only gives power to the Dems. Life ain't pretty but it is all we have.

156 posted on 12/07/2005 4:47:15 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

If we continue to support Republicans, even when they piddle on us, they'll continue to piddle on us. Nuts to that. If we take them to the woodshed, show them who's boss, maybe next time they'll think twice before double crossing principled conservatives. The party needs a trip to the woodshed and Hell will freeze over before I vote for Tricky Ricky again.


157 posted on 12/07/2005 5:05:56 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: libertyman

Exactly on point.

I don't disagree at all.


158 posted on 12/07/2005 6:30:24 PM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess

Betcha not. LOL


159 posted on 12/07/2005 6:33:01 PM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

You don't understand.

PA conservatives had the opportunity to elect (what we thought to be) the second conservative senator, but the whole GOP infrastructure exerted itself to crush him. Even fellow conservatives Bush and Specter supported the RINO out of party protocol. Principle be damned.

If a challenger stood up to Santorum, the full weight of the Party would be brought to bear again. You can't remove Ricky by challenging him. He and the Party must understand that they screwed the pooch last year and the result will be that Ricky WILL lose next November. Our only chance to hold that seat is for Ricky to be told to get out or to be given some cushy job somewhere.

I and others have been saying it for 18 months or longer. We told party officials. We've told Santorum. We're telling everyone. If they don't listen, it's not our fault.


160 posted on 12/07/2005 6:41:00 PM PST by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson