Posted on 12/04/2005 5:27:49 AM PST by Iris7
Troubled U.S. automakers and their allies on Capitol Hill are seeking billions of dollars in aid from the federal government ranging from health coverage for their workers to extra tax write-offs for themselves.
They're also asking for one rhetorical favor: Please don't call the requests a bailout.
"I don't view it as a bailout," Sen. Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.) said.
"We're not looking for a bailout," agreed William C. Ford Jr., chairman of Ford Motor Co.
The "B" word has been taboo ever since Chrysler Corp., faced with impending insolvency, sought and narrowly won $1.5 billion in loan guarantees from Washington in 1979 and 1980. The company eventually borrowed $1.2 billion and repaid the loans in 1983, seven years earlier than was required.
Nonetheless, the notion of the American taxpayer saving a company with a large and quick fix has pretty much gone out of style and has not been repeated since, with the exception of loan guarantees to airlines after 9/11. Even though General Motors Corp. and its rival Ford Motor now face serious financial straits, both are studiously avoiding public condemnation by spreading their aid requests widely among many types of government policies.
Taken together, however, the components of their wish list would cost tens of billions -- far more than Chrysler ever dared to seek.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
The latest set of Ford ads with the family scion trying to be like Lia Iacocca are hilarious. When I saw those for the first time - 4 color, 2 page center spread in section 1 of the Wall Street Journal, I just thought "Wow, they must really be in trouble". The whole "quality is US" or whatever it's callled smacks of desperation and lack of imagination.
They don't and until that changes, there will be nothing but heartache for the employees.
Election year 2008. And it will be implemented within 2 or 3 years. So by 2011 we will have it.
I am sure. I was with a large company once that was acquired and most of the existing employees were summarily fired. Many personal problems surfaced.
However, eventually, most people recovered. And actually, there wasn't a choice. It wasn't much different than, say, an economic hurricane.
It came, it destroyed,...people rebuilt their lives. That's life.
Not true. My Vette has active handling, anti-lock braking, active traction control, electronic active ride control, performance algorithm shifting, electronic throttle control (included in the engine controller), engine knock sensors, dual electronic spark control sensors, camshaft position sensors, OnStar, Homelink, XM Satellite radio, Heads-up display (includes dot-matrix readouts for street mode, track mode with g-meter, vehicle speed, engine rpm, and readings from key gauges including water temperature and oil pressure), GPS Nav with LCD color map, an OLED two line Driver Information Center that monitors many vehicle functions such as tire pressure, oil temp, etc. (over 56 in all), electronic indexed windows, electrochromic mirrors, voice recognition (I can talk to the Vette and it talks back), keyless entry, push button start, all electronic guages (with white LED and fiber optic diaplays), electronic emission controls and sensors, HID headlights, etc.
I could go on but have been boring enough already. LOL! Some of the above allows a car that can do 0-60 in ~4 seconds and has a top end of 186 to get better than 20 miles per gallon.
Personally I love the electronics.
Ditto. The PM was an old timer and has been in the industry long enough to see quite a bit of ups and downs. It looks like it is headed down again, at least at GM and Ford.
I am a sales manager and I make sure that GPS Navigation is used by most of my salespeople. It makes them more productive since they have no trouble finding customer locations and can actually see 2-3 more customers per day!
Of course, some people would rather have us return to the horse and buggy.
That's untrue.
ALL US auto manufacturers are subject to CAFE rules. The calculation is separate for domestic and imports for each company. This is why Ford outsourced parts for the Crown Victoria and Grand Marquis years ago -- so that those care would count as "imports" and help their domestic CAFE standards. (GM Forrd and Chrysler typically import small cars more than large; hence the "gaming" on the large car sourcing).
For CAFE purposes, Canada is counted as domestic.
European and Japanese manufacturers have been insourcing into the United States for twenty years. Toyota and Honda began in Kentucky and Ohio; BMW and Mercedes are in South Carolina and Alabama. Bashing Europeans and Japanese for importing was accurate in 1986; in 2005 it's just not accurate.
Airlines.
But I agree, they won't help me if I screw up and mismanage MY business.
Personally I find the whole affair like Sophocles' "Oedipus", of a terrible and inescapable fate, of a drawn out crushing of optimism and innocence, and of ambition and blindness.
Tried for years to do something, anything, positive. Very frustrating and then depressing. Over all that now, but still sad to see the utter denial.
I guess that is far to much to ask.
BTW: My father worked as an executive with one of the Big Three as well as a major Japanese auto manufacturer.
To add my two cents to my agreement, I see the problem as seeing economic life as a matter of meeting the quarterly target whatever the long term results will be. The MBA attitude.
A problem with the American auto industry is that the UAW can destroy any and all auto manufacturers but that the manufacturers cannot destroy the UAW. This means that the UAW is the powerful one and the companies are the weak.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.