Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lauer Treats Kerry with all "Due" Respect; Matalin Loaded for Bear
Today Show/NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 12/01/2005 5:25:07 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

by Mark Finkelstein

December 1, 2005 - 08:16.

Sometimes even the Marxists get it right, and no, I'm not speaking of John Kerry. I'm referring to Karl Marx himself, who famously said "history repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.”

To judge by his treatment at the hands of Matt Lauer this morning, John Kerry, Part Deux teeters on the brink of being seen as a farce and an embarrassment, even by his erstwhile supporters in the MSM.

Kerry was in to offer his critique of Pres. Bush's speech of yesterday in which he laid out his plan for victory in Iraq.

When Kerry argued that "the insurgency has to be dealt with through a political reconciliation," Lauer cut him off peremptorily, and did so saying: "with all due respect," not-so-subtle code for "not much respect is due." Lauer pointed out that "the President talked about the political process as well and laid that out in his plan for victory."

Lauer had done his homework and continued his critique of Kerry's bona fides thusly:

"I've been reading the key points of the plan you laid out on November 10th, and in all honesty, except for the fact that you want to withdraw 20,000 US forces immediately following successful elections in December, it doesn't seem that you have all that much disagreement on the big items on that list."

Compare and contrast with the reverential treatment a John McCain or other Today fave receives, and Kerry should realize that he had been seriously 'dissed' this morning.

Then it was on to Katie Couric's interview of Mary Matalin, former adviser to VP Cheney.

Matalin was the living antithesis of the notion that the Bush administration has been lackadaisical in its response to critics. She was absolutely loaded for bear, citing an avalanche of facts and figures to make the case that there has been significant military, political and economic progress in Iraq and that a precipitous withdrawal, as urged by some Democrats, would be disastrous for both Iraq and our own national security interests.

Mary got off a zinger right out of the box. Couric asked her to comment on Kerry's suggestion that an estimated timetable for troop withdrawal is something that needs to be debated.

Matalin, unsuccessfully suppressing a grin: "it has been discussed and debated, and John Kerry was against that position before he was for it." Ouch.

When Matalin cited an impressive list of accomplishments in Iraq, Couric countered with the President's weak poll numbers on Iraq.

When Matalin began to react, Couric cut her off: "before you sigh so audibly and visibly, Mary, the latest Gallup poll shows the president's approval ratings at an all-time low. Why is there such a disconnect between what is going on in Iraq and how the American public is perceiving it?"

Matalin: "For months now, the Democrats have been saying 'the President lied, the President lied, the President lied', with no evidence whatsoever. In that same period of time the President's credibility has dropped 20 points. Now he's fighting back."

She continued: "People here are bombarded with relentless demagoguery from the Democrats, and frankly, a disproportionate [negative] view of what's going on in Iraq from the MSM is affecting the polls."

Couric sought to end on a Kumbaya note: "You know, Mary, 160,000 US service men and women, many of them quite young, are still in Iraq. Do you think somehow Democrats and Republicans can get together and agree on some kind of strategy since so many US lives have already been lost and so many are continuing to be at risk?"

Matalin was having none of a false consensus:

"The cost of action is high - we've lost 2000 of our best and brightest in three years. But the cost of inaction is even greater. We lost in three hours 3000 innocent Americans. There is a cost of inaction and we should have that debate."

She continued, barely pausing for breath: "And we should talk about the consequences of pulling out, which would be rampant slaughter, implosion of the country, destabilization, in the region and global economic consequences. They don't talk about what they're doing . . . emboldening our enemies by talking about withdrawal."

As Katie Couric likes to say of her feminist sisters: you go girl!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last
To: SMARTY
Kerry needs to tell us the name of Osama bin Laden's Diplomat in the region, so we can negotiate an end to the conflict in Iraq /sarcasm
41 posted on 12/01/2005 5:57:38 AM PST by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy

I never trust anyone that I know is sleeping with the enemy.


42 posted on 12/01/2005 5:57:43 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, Over there, we will be there until it is Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jedgarlives

Your opinion, I don't agree wit it. Bush 41 lost because he lied. End of story.


43 posted on 12/01/2005 5:57:46 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: whershey
Considering that the MSM basically controls PR how exactly do they accomplish that?

If the Admin can't figure that out, they aren't showing much in the way of leadership, are they? Reagan had the same MSM problems; yet, he found a way to circumnavigate them to get his message out.

For one thing, the Bush admin should have 'demanded' network time. Any network not giving it would be subjected to 'bully pulpit' retribution. But first, the President has to ask for the time. He apparently didn't even ask. [I am sure the Naval Academy would have altered their schedule and allowed the speech to be held during the evening hours, had they been asked to.]
44 posted on 12/01/2005 5:58:03 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
F'n has a plan?

Yep .. he was for a time table before he was against it

One would think he would have learned from this double speak during the election campaign

But nooooooooooooooooo

45 posted on 12/01/2005 5:58:16 AM PST by Mo1 (Message to Democrats .... We do not surrender and run from a fight !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I saw this and thought Mary did a great job too.....I also thought Lauer was unusually tough on Kerry ...was glad I watched this morning.


46 posted on 12/01/2005 6:00:41 AM PST by Fawn (Try not---do or do not. ~~ Yoda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

House divided.


47 posted on 12/01/2005 6:01:30 AM PST by sauropod ("The love that dare not speak its' name has now become the love that won't shut the hell up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07; governsleastgovernsbest
How can anyone have such conviction & so many facts.... ..and still share a bed and children with one of the slickmeister's partner in crime, propaganda and disinformation?

B.S! She's brilliant! And frankly, so is corporal cueball....in this respect: If you want to provide a long term career in the slime of Washington, you do punditry. Pundits wax and wane depending on the occupants of 1600 PennAve. The best way to provide for your children if you choose to live in DC would be like what they've done. Each one feeds the other. For our side, it's half full. For them, it's all good.

48 posted on 12/01/2005 6:02:25 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

The closer we get to victory, success upon success, like the elections, constitution, etc. in Iraq the more hysterical the Media and the left get.


49 posted on 12/01/2005 6:04:24 AM PST by teddyballgame (red man in blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
Someone PLEASE tell me, what politics let alone politicians will the terrorists put forward to 'negotiate' on a diplomatic or moral par with the duly appointed representatives of the UN, US/Coalition or the newly made Iraq government?????

Needs to be repeated

An excellent question to be asked of the Dems

Though I won't wait for David Gregory, Harold Finemen or Chrissy Matthews to ask the Dems this question

50 posted on 12/01/2005 6:04:40 AM PST by Mo1 (Message to Democrats .... We do not surrender and run from a fight !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy; Coop; RobFromGa
Not bad for ole Matt today.

Matt was hard on Kerry cuz he's trying to be fair and balanced. He's hard on the yokell that lost the election to W. Eating their own is all that was.

51 posted on 12/01/2005 6:05:54 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

I suspect that in the privacy of Griswolds bedroom Carville and Mary meet somewhere just to the right of center. Like you said, they're both well up there on Stanford Binet and they have fashioned an excellent living out of it. Hey, I couldn't do it but somebody has to.


52 posted on 12/01/2005 6:06:17 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: sam_paine

"Not bad for ole Matt today."

I don't think the press particularly likes Kerry. He ran an awful campaign and the Left & MSM won't let him run again. Thats why Lauer spanked him.


54 posted on 12/01/2005 6:09:01 AM PST by teddyballgame (red man in blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Matalin, unsuccessfully suppressing a grin: "it has been discussed and debated, and John Kerry was against that position before he was for it."

That's gonna leave a mark.
55 posted on 12/01/2005 6:10:02 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

If you keep this up I am going
to start watching it myself bump.


56 posted on 12/01/2005 6:11:17 AM PST by WKB (If you can't dazzle them with brilliance.. then Baffle them with BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Matalin Loaded for Bear

I saw Mary M. this morning. Yes, she was sharp.

But let me ask you, glgb ......... does all of this just seem like an ongoing charade................. she being a heavy-duty and effective Republican ......... close to the PREZ ....... and her husband, dear James.......... God bless him, he's a funny guy but working for "the other side"........... doesn't this, glgb, sometimes just hit you as a big joke on all of us.......... a giant put on???

Well, it is a charade. (Btw, are either Mary or James members of the CFR?)

But Mary was a fine performer this morning, glgb. She's a tough cookie,............. and btw, I see that interesting marriage lasting forever. They love each other! It has to be a ball.........she reading the Washington Times, he reading the Washington Compost over morning coffee:.........."Gee Jim, Joe Lieberman isn't quite getting as much coverage (none) for his positive comments on Iraq as your "patriot" John Murtha............. Got any reason for that, Jimmie?

LOL!

57 posted on 12/01/2005 6:16:37 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teddyballgame
I don't think the press particularly likes Kerry.

But if he'd won:

58 posted on 12/01/2005 6:17:30 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: WKB

LOL. You mean, if Today continues to show signs of occasionally being 'fair & balanced'? It has been happening with some frequency in recent weeks. I'm still not ready to declare a trend or even to attempt to explain it. But I will surely be keeping track!


59 posted on 12/01/2005 6:18:26 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Katie Couric DREAMS that she has the where-with-all to take on Mary Matalin.


60 posted on 12/01/2005 6:19:56 AM PST by lawgirl (Y'all don't wanna hear me, ya just wanna dance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson