Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Victor Yanukovich Tops Ukraine's Polls
Forum Ukraine/United Press International (UPI) ^ | Peter Lavelle

Posted on 11/29/2005 6:03:09 PM PST by jb6

Moscow, Russia Ukrainians will elect a new parliament in March and one-time prime minister and former presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovych heads the political party leading the polls.

The "Orange Revolution" that delivered Viktor Yushchenko to the presidency is in disarray, and has given Yanukovych an election platform full of irony: Campaigning against the corruption and incompetence of the ruling elite.

According to a recent public opinion poll conducted by the Razumkov Center, Yanukovych's Party of the Regions tops voter preference for the slated March 26 parliamentary election with 17.5 percent.

The People's Union-Our Ukraine electoral bloc that includes Yushchenko as its honorary chairman is second with 13.5 percent and the Batkivshchina (Fatherland) Party of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko close behind at 12.4 percent.

Ukraine's other parties represented in parliament - Communist Party of Ukraine, the Socialist Party of Ukraine and the People's Party of speaker of parliament Volodymyr Lytvyn - polled above the necessary 3 percent to wins seats in the next legislature. Other polls put the blocs that support Yushchenko and Tymoshenko in a dead heat or the latter slightly ahead.

Topping the polls and connecting with the electorate have never been as important for Ukraine's political parties. As part of the behind closed-doors negotiations during last December's "Orange Revolution," Ukraine will, as of Jan. 1, change from being a semi-presidential political system to one dominated by a parliamentary-presidential form of government. With Yushchenko and Tymoshenko now political opponents, Yanukovych seeks to take advantage of the split in the "orange" coalition.

Parliament will determine who occupies government ministries and who will be prime minister -- currently decisions made by the president. The parliament also may be able to force the president to hand over many of the powers that have slowly fallen to the presidency over the years, though they legally belong to parliament or the prime minister. There should be no doubt that Yanukovych and his allies have been patiently waiting for these changes.

New parliamentary rules mandate the party that garners the most votes will have the right to determine who will be named prime minister. This may or may not happen if Yanukovych's Party of the Regions wins the largest number of votes. Irrespective of the rule, Yanukovych is angling to make a political come back with popular support.

In September, Yushchenko fired the entire Cabinet, replacing Prime Minister Tymoshenko and his former comrade-in-arms with Dnipropetrovs'k Gov. Yuri Yekhanurov. Yushchenko's government had been severely criticized for not addressing what the "Orange Revolution" was supposed to end: Endemic corruption and political favoritism.

Yushchenko's chief of staff, Olexander Zinchenko, who resigned and initiated the Cabinet shake-up, has accused national security secretary Petro Poroshenko of bribery, media intrusion and obstructing the justice system.

Poroshenko resigned, but remains a political insider Yushchenko appears unwilling or unable to shake-off. This is Yushchenko's biggest problem, Tymoshenko's issue to manipulate and Yanukovych's very passive message to tell voters, "I told you so."

Yushchenko has shown himself to be an indecisive and incoherent politician. Kiev's voters would probably consider his greatest accomplishment to be ridding the city of its corrupt traffic cops, but that was not what the "Orange Revolution" was all about.

The "Orange Revolution" was originally about Ukrainians demanding something be done about the country's worst malady - corruption in the political elite as the result of a few oligarchs controlling the economy and state.

When she was prime minister, Tymoshenko played the anti-corruption and nationalist card to the detriment of the economy. Her calls to revisit thousands of privatization deals of state assets scared off foreign investors and the dramatic increase of social payments stoked inflation. During Tymoshenko's tenure in office, Ukraine's GDP annual growth nose-dived from 12 percent to 4 percent.

Yanukovych is sitting pretty and has good reason to do so. Waiting on the sidelines and watching the former opposition - now divided - appeal to the electorate, Yanukovych is slowly consolidating his support as the leader of the Regions of Ukraine party.

He was partially rehabilitated when Tymoshenko's government was dismissed and his September "Memorandum of Understanding" with Yushchenko returned him to public eye in a positive way and damaged Yushchenko's reputation among his core supporters.

Accusing both Tymoshenko and Yushchenko of running a lawless government, many Ukrainians disappointed with the "Orange Revolution" appear to be listening.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: communism; elections; hardliners; orangerevolution; prorussia; russia; ukraine; yanukovych; yushchenko

1 posted on 11/29/2005 6:03:09 PM PST by jb6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jb6

Looks like the pro-Western Orange revolution did not last. I bet that the KGB controlled Russians had something to do with it....


2 posted on 11/29/2005 8:00:00 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
Or maybe the Soros/EU controlled Yushchenko's & Tymoshenko's increasing taxes by 20%, minimal wage by 90% (thus an increase in unemployment), destroying thousands of small businesses, inflation at 17%, maximum price caps on meat, milk, wheat, gas, gasoline and oil causing shortages, and dropping the GDP growth from 12.7% last year to barely 3.8% this year.

Now who sounds more communist? Nothing like a bunch of spoiled Oranges to ruin an economy.

3 posted on 11/29/2005 8:18:33 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Oh and by the way, Yushchenko and Tymoshenko were both Communist Party members and apparatcheks, or how do you think Tymoshenko earned $11 billion and the title of Gas Princes in 5 years of government "service"?


4 posted on 11/29/2005 8:19:36 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jb6

KGB or Communists... Sounds like a raw deal accross the board.


5 posted on 11/29/2005 9:55:39 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

The orange revolution was NEVER pro-Western.

It was just another faction, who wanted power and people in the West bought the propaganda.

The bottom line was that Kuchma, the previous PM provided very tangible help to us in Iraq, sending a large number of troops. Yushchenko, your fine "pro-West" leader pulled out the troops from Iraq, stabbing the US in the back, they tried to stop privatization and tanked the economy.

People are starting to figure it out.


6 posted on 12/10/2005 11:33:25 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

See Golitsyn et all!


7 posted on 12/10/2005 11:41:27 AM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

He was going to pull out anyway... He was getting pressured by Russia to do so.


8 posted on 12/10/2005 11:41:59 AM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

NO, Yanukovich only said he would, when Yushchenko started to run on that platform, and Yanukovich certainly didn't want to lose the election on that accout.

The way I recall was that Ukraine was something like #5, in the list of countries ordered by the number of troops they supplied, after the US, UK, Australia and maybe one other country (Japan?).

Yushchenko was for breaking all the previous privatization deals, that sounds like a socialist to me, NOT a capitalist or reformer.


9 posted on 12/10/2005 11:48:01 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jb6

.....Batkivshchina (Fatherland) Party.....

That's what we need in America.... The Victory Party and the defeatest party.


10 posted on 12/10/2005 11:50:23 AM PST by bert (K.E. ; N.P . Chicken spit causes flu....... Fox News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Yanukovich is partners with all the oligarch gangsters who got rich quick plundering Ukraine and Russia in the nineties. His main financier was a mohammedan oligarch, the richest man in Ukraine, Renat Akhmetov.

Yanukovych feels Kuchma "betrayed" him because he did not crush the Orange protesters with tanks and enforce Yanukovych's stolen election.

11 posted on 12/10/2005 11:59:38 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson