Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firebrand Tancredo puts policy over party line
denverpost ^ | 27. november 2005 | Anne C. Mulkern

Posted on 11/27/2005 8:28:54 PM PST by Icelander

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-245 next last
To: calrighty
You always accuse SOMEONE of being a Buchananite.

Not really. But feel free to come out of the closet. No one will care.

You and Dane out to get married.

Probably your wet dream but hate to dash your hopes. Not happening.

221 posted on 11/28/2005 1:58:58 PM PST by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

This guys is the type of leader our country needs, though-and-through.

" Tancredo also recalls that Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge was giving a briefing and was asked why he had not used the military to help defend and protect the borders. Ridge responded, "There are political and cultural reasons why we can't do that." "Not acceptable!" said Tancredo, "I want an explanation of these cultural and historical reasons why we can't protect our nation's borders."


222 posted on 11/28/2005 2:16:54 PM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145; traviskicks

You guys having fun holding hands?


223 posted on 11/28/2005 3:57:01 PM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
>> I'm not trashing Bay Buchanan. I'm pointing out that there is a link between Buchanan and Tancredo. Some appear to be suggesting otherwise. <<

And we're pointing out there IS a link just as strong between Reagan and Buchanan. I realize you're not trashing Tancredo over working with Bay, but some people are. That is pure hypocrisy on their part. I bet none of the Tancredo bashers here declined to support Reagan because HE was being funded by Bay Buchanan. "Do as I say, not as I do" seems to be their slogan.

224 posted on 11/28/2005 5:54:53 PM PST by BillyBoy (Find out the TRUTH about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "Best Friend" in the GOP... www.nolahood.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
"And we're pointing out there IS a link just as strong between Reagan and Buchanan."

?????

After buchanan got into a power struggle with a young staffer by the name of Peggy Noonan President Reagan "promoted" him to a windowless office with no staff or duties. He took the hint and finally resigned.

225 posted on 11/28/2005 5:58:23 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
>> After buchanan got into a power struggle with a young staffer by the name of Peggy Noonan President Reagan "promoted" him to a windowless office with no staff or duties. He took the hint and finally resigned. <<

Gee, Is PAT Buchanan on Tom Tancredo's payroll? No. BAY Buchanan is assisting Tom, with Pat's support.

BAY Buchanan also assisted Ronald Reagan, with Pat's support.

Why is it okay when Reagan uses Bay to raise $$$, but bad when Tom does it? Did I miss something here? The "link" to Buchanan (via his sister Bay) was no different with Reagan than it was for Tom.

226 posted on 11/28/2005 6:08:40 PM PST by BillyBoy (Find out the TRUTH about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "Best Friend" in the GOP... www.nolahood.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Just pointing out how highly President Reagan thought of buchanan; instead of outright firing him they gave him a suptle hint. Granted, it took a while for it to sink into buchanan's head, but he always was a little slow.

As for using pat and bay's mailing list, I'm sure it is free and comes with no strings attached...sure.

227 posted on 11/28/2005 6:14:02 PM PST by CWOJackson (michael savage: the white trash alternative to talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I see. So while both Ronnie and Tom paired up with BAY Buchanan to raise $$$, Ronnie went even further and personally hired PAT Buchanan -- but that's OKAY because he later demoted Pat.

Sop if Tom personally hires PAT Buchanan and then gives him a windowless office to "demote" him, then will it be acceptable to vote for Tom?

228 posted on 11/28/2005 6:21:53 PM PST by BillyBoy (Find out the TRUTH about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "Best Friend" in the GOP... www.nolahood.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
You keep talking about President Reagan. Let's not forget the last Presidental candidate buchanan worked for. That would be Al Gore.

I guess you forget how buchanan said he wasn't going to campaign in closely contested states...then turned around and did exactly that. He spent his money running anti-Bush ads in closely fought states...not campaigning for himself, or to stop Gore...but against Governor Bush.

Hey, and he didn't even charge Gore for that help.

229 posted on 11/28/2005 6:29:57 PM PST by CWOJackson (michael savage: the white trash alternative to talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Apples and oranges. You keep talking about Pat Buchanan when the issue is BAY Buchanan. Pat Buchanan has never worked for Tancredo. BAY is the one assisting Tom, NOT PAT BUCHANAN.

Yes, Bay is Pat Buchanan's (much younger) sister. Ed Thompson, the Libertarian candidate for Wisconsin brother, is Tommy Thompson's brother. He even looks just like Tommy. But guess what? Alot of people who supported Ed did NOT support Tommy and vice versa.

I know in your fantasyworld, everyone who supports Tom Tancredo is a loyal Pitchforker, but I have NEVER been for PAT Buchanan and his neoconfederate, Isreal-bashing agenda. Check my posting history in 2000. I am delighted Buchanan crashed and burned with under 1% of the vote after he hijacked the DEFORMED party nomination. No principled conservative would join a centrist, pro-abortion party AFTER complaining the GOP was too centrist and not pro-life enough. I'm total agreement with you about Buchanan's laughable 2000 campaign. Perhaps the only difference is I remember Buchanan's "big" issue in 2000 wasn't even immigration, it was "America First" (a.k.a. trades and tariffs). His book on immigration came out POST-2000.

Tom Tancredo is a long-time, ELECTED Republican official who is everything Pat Buchanan isn't. He was promoted by Reagan, NOT demoted. He has an perfect track record of WINNING campaigns since 1976 (total number of campaigns won by Pat: 0) He is strongly pro-Isreal and against the Islamofascist threat, he is running to represent ALL of America -- not pander to voters in the deep south, he is much stronger on taxes that Pat ever was, and has said over and over he will be seeking the GOP nomination, not trying to hijack some other organization that doesn't share any of his values.

He has ONE thing in common with Pat Buchanan: a similar outlook on immigration. So maybe Pat's sister is helping Tom on immigration with Pat's blessing. Maybe Pat will donate to Tom's campaign because he likes Tom views on that issue. Hell, maybe Pat will even campaign for Tom. That doesn't make Tom Tancredo a "sock puppet" for Buchanan anymore than Bush is a clone of Condi Rice and her pro-abortion views because they HAPPEN to agree on foriegn policy so Condi worked closely with Bush to get him elected.

I can support Bush for President while opposing Condi for the job, and I can support Tancredo for the job while opposing Buchanan's Deformed Party campaign.

But going by your "guilt by association" rules, has your hero Harry Browne informed you which open-borders Libertarian candidate to vote for against Tancredo? I mean Libertarians = Open borders , tancredo-haters, Freepers who trash Tancredo = open borders, tancredo-haters. I sense a connection. You voted for Browne, right?

230 posted on 11/28/2005 8:18:00 PM PST by BillyBoy (Find out the TRUTH about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "Best Friend" in the GOP... www.nolahood.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
"You keep talking about Pat Buchanan when the issue is BAY Buchanan."

Yes, my original comments, and responses, were to clarify comments you made about pat buchanan. I see you finally realized that and in only a few hours.

In regards to it bay selling her services to tancredo you're absolutely corrent. She is the one who manages "pat's" donor mailing lists and was his co-profiteer in the last election. If you believe that tancredo is getting her assistance freely, and that pat is not involved, then you...well, that's pretty well evident.

231 posted on 11/28/2005 8:25:09 PM PST by CWOJackson (michael savage: the white trash alternative to talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Don't get worked up over this moron. He's afraid of Tancredo, and so he wants to prevent people from donating money to him. As you say, since Bay managed Reagan's campaign quite successfully, she'd do quite well for Tancredo's campaign as well.

If these clowns really believed that the money would be squandered, then they definitely wouldn't be trying to warn people away from donating. They'd be happy to see their efforts wasted.

232 posted on 11/28/2005 8:43:49 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: inquest
"He's afraid of Tancredo."

LOL! Hardly. People who will give their money to tancredo are the same ones who would give it to any other fringe candidate so there's nothing to worry about. Regarding bay, she wasn't President Reagan's campaign manager; she was just a bean counter.

She did manage her brother two campaigns, and while they were political disasters they did turn out to be financial wind falls which was probably the intended purpose anyway. bay and pat, along with other siblings of the buchanan family, made a killing of his last campaign.

The really humorous thing about all of this is bay and pat will end up getting a percentage of every dollar donated to tancredo.

233 posted on 11/28/2005 8:51:38 PM PST by CWOJackson (michael savage: the white trash alternative to talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Icelander
"Right after 9/11, Tom Tancredo was pushing many of the ideas that bona fide white-supremacist groups were pushing," said Mark Potok, director of intelligence for the Southern Poverty Law Center in Alabama, which monitors hate groups."

Just because someone may by a white-supremacist doesn't mean they can not be right on some issues.
234 posted on 11/28/2005 11:44:54 PM PST by Razz Barry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Regarding bay, she wasn't President Reagan's campaign manager; she was just a bean counter.

Bay Buchanan was treasurer of Ronald Reagan's presidential campaigns in 1976 and 1980, so I assume "bean counter" is your cutesy term for treasurer. Bay was also appointed Treasurer of the United States by President Reagan in 1981.

235 posted on 11/29/2005 1:12:18 AM PST by judgeandjury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; CWOJackson

Billyboy:

Here is a link to Pat Buchanan's column written in 2004 in which he endorses George Bush for president in 2004:
http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover.html.

I disagree with Pat Buchanan's position on Israel and his position on how to address the present situation in Iraq. Cong. Tancredo is a strong supporter of Israel, unlike Pat Buchanan. Also, Cong. Tancredo supports the position of the president with regard to Iraq.

Arnoldpalmerfan


236 posted on 11/29/2005 5:47:01 AM PST by arnoldpalmerfan (Tancredo for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
I don't trust Tancredo. Remember his McCain-style statement to the press regarding DeLay?

I also do not trust him to not run as a third-party candidate if he does not get the nomination. He's far too cozy with the Buchanans and they are only in it for the Buchanans.

Buchanan found Bush more offensive than Gore. I find that offensive. I have no use for those who are not team players and I fear Tancredo is no team player.

I hope he runs like heck for the nomination but when that's over, if he's not the nominee, he gets behind the Republican nominee and tries again.

237 posted on 11/29/2005 6:02:38 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
3. The best way to achieve a win on the immigration issue is to persuade those GOP candidates who have a real chance of winning the presidency to adopt/co-opt Tancredo's stance on immigration.

Read the original article, it clearly states in there that that's one of the things Tancredo has set out to do.

It's fairly clear to a lot of us that you did just come here to crap on the thread. Your 'oversight' is just more evidence.

238 posted on 11/29/2005 6:31:45 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
"I have no use for those who are not team players and I fear Tancredo is no team player."

I consider myself to be a "team player", if that means supporting a conservative team. Tancredo is undeniably conservative, which is why I support him. If, however, you mean supporting someone with an "R" after their name even though they allow an illegal immigrant invasion of our republic and who outspends Lyndon B. Johnson, no, I don't consider them a part of the "team". I support conservatives. If they happen to be Republicans, good. But if Republicans vote like liberals, they have joined the wrong "team".
239 posted on 11/29/2005 6:37:06 AM PST by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: reelfoot
I get your point. But does this mean you will only vote for a Republican that you agree with 100%? We'll never get anywhere if that's what you're saying.

I'm saying fight like heck for Tancredo if that's who you want in the primary process. I'm from Iowa and have quite a bit of power in determining our next nominee and I do not have a horse in this race, yet. It won't be Tancredo. It will be a conservative. But I will be supporting the Republican nominee in the general election.

I was a Forbes supporter at the caucus. I was not crazy about Bush but by golly, when it was over, Bush was far superior to Gore.

That's what I'm saying. After the primary process is over, we coalesce around our nominee.

We ended up with RINO Ganske running against Harkin. I couldn't stand Ganske but he was better than Harkin so I held my nose and voted for him.

240 posted on 11/29/2005 6:46:54 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson