Posted on 11/27/2005 8:28:54 PM PST by Icelander
Tancredo for President BUMP!!!!
Cong. Tancredo is as conservative as any of the potential Republican candidates for president in 2008.
On May 3, 2005, Cong. Tancredo received one of the "Best & Brightest" awards from the American Conservative Union (ACU). The ACU recognized those members of the U.S. Congress who recorded a perfect score of one hundred percent (100%) in the ACU ratings. Here is a link to the ACU's web page with photos of May 3, 2005, ceremony at which the "Best & Brightest" awards were given: http://conservative.org/pressroom/bestbrightest.asp . The ACU ratings are based on how representatives voted during twenty-five (25) votes. Cong. Tancredo achieved his perfect score with none of the votes having anything to do with immigration.
In March 2005, Cong. Tancredo received the "Taxpayers' Friend Award" from the National Taxpayers Union (NTU). According to the NTU, Cong. Tancredo was given an "A" rating by the NTU for being one of the strongest supporters of responsible tax and spending policies in Congress. Here is a link to the NTU's list of "2004 Taxpayer Friends": http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=75 . Cong. Tancredo ranked twelth (12th) highest in the entire House of Representatives in NTU's ratings.
Cong. Tancredo is strongly pro-life. Cong. Tancredo was rated 0% by NARAL in December 2003. Here is a link to a website that provides a list of ten (10) votes by Cong. Tancredo'on the subject of abortion: http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Tom_Tancredo.htm . It also provides a list of votes on many other subjects.
The National Right to Life Committee's website lists Tancredo Cong. Tancredo as casting twenty (20) votes related to abortion during the 106th Congress (1999-2000). He received a score of one hundred percent (100%) from the National Right to Life Committee for that session. Here is a link to that scorecard: http://www.capwiz.com/nrlc/scorecard/?chamber=H&session=106&x=15&y=10#CO . During the 107th Congress (2001-2002), Cong. Tancredo cast sixteen (16) votes related to abortion. He received a score of one hundred perecent (100%) from the National Right to Life Committee for that session. Here is a link to that scorecard: http://www.capwiz.com/nrlc/scorecard/?chamber=H&session=107&x=17&y=12#CO . During the 108th Congress (2003-2004), Cong. Tancredo cast eleven (11) votes realted to abortion. He received a score of ninety-one perecent (91%) from the National Right to Life Committee for that session. Here is a link to that scorecard: http://www.capwiz.com/nrlc/scorecard/?chamber=H&session=108&x=4&y=16#CO . During the 109th Congress, Cong. Tancredo has thus far cast seven (7) votes relating to abortion. He has received a score of one hundred percent (100%) from the National Right to Life Committee for this session. Here is a link to that scorecard: http://www.capwiz.com/nrlc/scorecard/?chamber=H&session=109&x=11&y=10#CO .
I'm concerned with elected officials that are charged with protecting this nation's borders that are "far too cozy" with Vicente Fox. I find it "offensive" that more than four years after the attack by Islamic terrorists on this nation that killed approximately three thousand people, this nation's borders have still not been secured. In fact, the lack of enforcement of this nation's borders is disgraceful.
Many Tancredo detractors enjoy engaging the speculation that he will run as a third party candidate for president. I would like for those Tancredo detractors to present any proof that Cong. Tancredo is considering running for president on a third party ticket.
As for Pat Buchanan, Cong. Tancredo has significant differences with him on the subject of Israel and the conduct of the war in Iraq. Further, Pat Buchanan publicly supported the re-election of President Bush in 2004.
I'm glad Cong. Tancredo has not been a "team player" with regard to President Bush's policies regarding illegal aliens.
YAAFM
And that's what shows the utter futility of FROBLs' attempts to discredit him. If there's something about him personally that they don't like, they're always free to suggest someone else who'll push for the same platform (which is supported by about 3/4 of the voting public). They won't do it of course, because they don't agree with the platform, but are too cowardly to admit it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.