Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colin Powell: White House's Murtha Attack 'Disgraceful'
NewsMax.com ^ | Nov. 25, 2005 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 11/25/2005 9:58:25 AM PST by Carl/NewsMax

An angry former Secretary of State Colin Powell is blasting the Bush White House for attacking Rep. Jack Murtha, who undermined troop morale and encouraged al Qaida last week with his call for an immediate U.S. pullout from Iraq.

"To attack him the way he was attacked, accusing him of being a Michael Moore, was disgraceful and was not worthy," a Powell told the New York Post's Deborah Orin, who described him as "livid."

"Jack Murtha is great friend of mine," Powell declared. "He's a great patriot.

"I don't agree with his position," the former top Bush diplomat said. "But he has started a debate which is a good debate to have as to how long we should be there."

Hours after Murtha called for an immediate pullout last Thursday, White House press secretary Scott McClellan compared him to Michael Moore. Two days later, however, both President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney went out of their way to describe Murtha as "honorable."

Still, Powell focused instead on the earlier remark, and said nothing about the olive branch offered by Bush and Cheney.

The one-time chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff also suggested that the war on terror wasn't quite as serious as other challenges the U.S. has faced.

"We're not facing a world war anymore," Powell told the Post. "We have pretty much convinced the world that democracy is a better system than communism or fascism or totalitarianism."


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: colonic; disgraceful; murtha; powell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-292 next last
To: Willie Green

Hey Willie, that is a great Teddy quote. My shorthand version is to remind myself and everyone that they are all "functionaries."


121 posted on 11/25/2005 11:11:11 AM PST by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
We the People are sovereign, and politicians are merely public servants.
It is our responsibility to constantly remind them of that.
122 posted on 11/25/2005 11:15:15 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: neodad
re: I'm tired of Powell.

Amen to that! As I recall it was him getting concerned about all the killing along the highway out of Kuwait that put the stop to destroying Iraq's military after the first Desert Storm.

As far as I'm concerned his stint at Sec. of State did nothing good for our country.
123 posted on 11/25/2005 11:15:25 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #124 Removed by Moderator

To: BenLurkin

"At least it is now universally recognized that being compared to Michael Moore is very undesirable"

I love this. Does this mean Michael Mooron won't be invited to the next dem convention to sit on the right hand of Jimmah? I bet if he makes another Bush-bashing, America-bashing move, he will be. Dems never learn.


125 posted on 11/25/2005 11:15:36 AM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him...

You didn't bold that line, or three sentences before. How come?

126 posted on 11/25/2005 11:19:42 AM PST by polymuser (Losing, like flooding, brings rats to the surface.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
We the People are sovereign, and politicians are merely public servants. It is our responsibility to constantly remind them of that.

Yes, God forbid we should criticize Murtha and Powell. The thin-skinned knee-jerks are intolerant of anybody who doesn't toe the Murtha/Powell line.

127 posted on 11/25/2005 11:22:35 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

It's every bit as serious as WWII or the Cold War, just that the circumstances and details differ. Think it through: the terrorists have shown that they can slaughter thousands in the largest US city (and they easily might have gotten away with much much more), something neither the Nazis nor the Japanese militarists ever managed to do. There are many ways these terrorists COULD have been far more diabolically effective than they have been so far -- they have made many, many mistakes which have given us a chance to fight back despite the MSM and Euro-twits trying to tie our hands.

Sure, there are ways in which the terrorists don't (yet) have any of the military powers of a major nation-state to call upon, and no one in the world can match the USA on the battlefield or in the air, at sea, etc. Still, these Islamo-fascists have the potential to kill tens of thousands if not millions of US civilians with our wide open borders if/when they get ahold of WMDs.....

The challenges we face are every bit as serious as WWII, even if we do not face the kinds of domestic economic sacrifices that you cite.


128 posted on 11/25/2005 11:24:54 AM PST by Enchante (Joe Wilson: "I don't know anything about uranium, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont

Powell has much more time in uniform than my seven and one half years in a U. S. Air Force uniform though I'm getting real tired of him.


129 posted on 11/25/2005 11:27:23 AM PST by JOE43270 (JOE43270 America voted and said we are One Nation Under God with Liberty and Justice for All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: polymuser
You didn't bold that line, or three sentences before. How come?

And I could have quoted only the one sentence, omitting the rest of the paragraph
or I could've posted the whole paragraph in
BLINKING MEGA FONT CAPS.

There's lots of different ways I could've posted it.

So why do you want to know why I chose to put just the one sentence in bold?

Perhaps just to be a hair-splitting pissant?

130 posted on 11/25/2005 11:35:12 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Avenger
Scott McClellan said that it is "baffling that [Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha] is endorsing the policy positions of Michael Moore and the extreme liberal wing of the Democratic party."

Nothing is "Disgraceful" here Powell. It's the truth.

131 posted on 11/25/2005 11:35:45 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

I do believe that Powell always has been a closet Democrat who has been waiting for the right time to slam Bush. It seems it has started with this tirade...


132 posted on 11/25/2005 11:38:48 AM PST by biff0101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad
I'm tired of Powell. What has he contributed the last 10 years? Just worried about his "legacy" in the Washington press circles.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////

He's an international "statesman". Sees a bigger picture than the rest of us. Now prefers "diplomacy" to conflict. If he disagreed with Murtha's statements, then why didn't he diplomatically, for the record, say so? He's just more hot air. Murtha wouldn't even vote for his own suggestion. Why isn't Powell more worried about the feelings of the troops in Iraq than a lose lipped former marine who should have thought before he spoke?
133 posted on 11/25/2005 11:39:04 AM PST by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Why do I get the sick feeling it will become necessary to start treating former Secretary of State Colin Powell the same way as we treat former President Jimmuh Carter?

Here, let me start. STFU Colin!


134 posted on 11/25/2005 11:41:06 AM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
Tell me the truth. If you were the President would you want Scott McClellan speaking for you. He sucks.

Well, McClellan didn't suck in this instance. He was spot on.

135 posted on 11/25/2005 11:41:16 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Interesting response, considering the subject quotation.


136 posted on 11/25/2005 11:41:18 AM PST by polymuser (Losing, like flooding, brings rats to the surface.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

Ahhhh...the real Colin Powell has finally stood up. He might as well make it official and join the Democrat party.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////

Maybe Hillary/Powell ticket in '08


137 posted on 11/25/2005 11:42:06 AM PST by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: polymuser; Willie Green
...didn't bold that line, or three sentences before. How come?

Here's the full context, poly. You're right on target.

PS. Ignore the meaningless name calling.

138 posted on 11/25/2005 11:42:17 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: canalabamian
"What hints?"

All small things, easily missed unless you watch closely and are calibrated for such matters. Some have to do with a comment here, a remark there, usually nothing that draws a lot of attention. One had to do with affirmative action (she favors it), several others had to do with Israel, and I recall a couple on the Muslims. Not enough there on a single comment basis (except for the one on affirmative action) to raise the alert flags but, when looked at on a cumulative basis, it definitely raises serious questions.

I know this isn't much, and hardly damning, but I learned long ago to follow my instincts on these kinds of things. So far, what I see tells me Condi is no conservative. And nobody will be happier than me if I have to eat those words. Somehow, I don't think I will be dining on my own words.

139 posted on 11/25/2005 11:47:48 AM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
"When did the Whitehouse compare Murtha to Moore?"

You are technically correct, my apologies. The WH only linked Murtha's position to the position of Moore. I try to be more observant of specifics but sometimes, just hearing a statement on the radio or TV and not reviewing the official text, I find myself making the same interpretation as the average American probably does under similar circumstances. The MSM takes advantage of this type of citizen behavior when linking Bush to bad actors. The WH has a record of supporting a strong America. So it is baffling that, in this case, they would use a tactic similar to the MSM and the extreme liberal wing of the Democratic party. [Note that I am not "comparing" the WH to the MSM.]

140 posted on 11/25/2005 11:49:48 AM PST by LZ_Bayonet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson