Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KU prof's e-mail irks fundamentalists (Christian Bashing OK)
Wichita Eagle ^ | 25 Nov 2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 11/25/2005 8:34:07 AM PST by Exton1

KU prof's e-mail irks fundamentalists

http://www.kansas.com/mld/eagle/living/religion/13252419.htm

Associated Press

LAWRENCE - Critics of a new course that equates creationism and intelligent design with mythology say an e-mail sent by the chairman of the University of Kansas religious studies department proves the course is designed to mock fundamentalist Christians.

In a recent message on a Yahoo listserv, Paul Mirecki said of the course "Special Topics in Religion: Intelligent Design, Creationisms and Other Religious Mythologies":

"The fundies want it all taught in a science class, but this will be a nice slap in their big fat face by teaching it as a religious studies class under the category mythology."

He signed the note "Doing my part (to upset) the religious right, Evil Dr. P."

Kansas Provost David Shulenburger said Wednesday that he regretted the words Mirecki used but that he supported the professor and thought the course would be taught in a professional manner.

"My understanding was that was a private e-mail communication that somehow was moved out of those channels and has become a public document," Shulenburger said.

The course was added to next semester's curriculum after the Kansas State Board of Education adopted new school science standards that question evolution.

The course will explore intelligent design, which contends that life is too complex to have evolved without a "designer." It also will cover the origins of creationism, why creationism is an American phenomenon and creationism's role in politics and education.

State Sen. Karin Brownlee, R-Olathe, said she was concerned by Mirecki's comments in the e-mail.

"His intent to make a mockery of Christian beliefs is inappropriate," she said.

Mirecki said the private e-mail was accessed by an outsider.

"They had been reading my e-mails all along," he said. "Where are the ethics in that, I ask."

When asked about conservative anger directed at him and the new course, Mirecki said: "A lot of people are mad about what's going on in Kansas, and I'm one of them."

Mirecki has been taking criticism since the course was announced.

"This man is a hateful man," said state Sen. Kay O'Connor, R-Olathe. "Are we supposed to be using tax dollars to promote hatred?"

But others support Mirecki.

Tim Miller, a fellow professor in the department of religious studies, said intelligent design proponents are showing that they don't like having their beliefs scrutinized.

"They want their religion taught as fact," Miller said. "That's simply something you can't do in a state university."

Hume Feldman, associate professor of physics and astronomy, said he planned to be a guest lecturer in the course. He said the department of religious studies was a good place for intelligent design.

"I think that is exactly the appropriate place to put these kinds of ideas," he said.

John Altevogt, a conservative columnist and activist in Kansas City, said the latest controversy was sparked by the e-mail.

"He says he's trying to offend us," Altevogt said. "The entire tenor of this thing just reeks of religious bigotry."

Brownlee said she was watching to see how the university responded to the e-mail.

"We have to set a standard that it's not culturally acceptable to mock Christianity in America," she said.

University Senate Executive Committee Governance Office - 33 Strong Hall, 4-5169

Faculty

SenEx Chair

Joe Heppert, jheppert@ku.edu , Chemistry, 864-2270 Ruth Ann Atchley, ratchley@ku.edu , Psychology, 864-9816 Richard Hale, rhale@ku.edu ,Aerospace Engineering, 864-2949 Bob Basow, basow@ku.edu , Journalism, 864-7633 Susan Craig, scraig@ku.edu , Art & Architecture, 864-3020 Margaret Severson, mseverson@Ku.edu , Social Welfare, 864-8952
University Council President Jim Carothers, jbc@ku.edu , English 864-3426 (Ex-officio on SenEx)

Paul Mirecki, Chair The Department of Religious Studies, 1300 Oread Avenue, 102 Smith Hall, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas,Lawrence, KS 66045-7615 (785) 864-4663 Voice (785) 864-5205 FAX rstudies@ku.edu


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: bigot; christian; crevolist; goddoodit; ku; lefty; leftybigot; mirecki; muslim; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 621-625 next last
To: RightWingNilla
BWHAHHAA! Imagine how warped your brain has to be to actually think this way.

Especially, when you are criticized by people who can't spell "penecillin"[sic]

Dictionary.com

461 posted on 11/27/2005 2:25:17 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Yes, I'm just pointing out the desperate attempt to discredit your argument through red herring. You have already pointed out their Ad Hominem.


462 posted on 11/27/2005 2:26:54 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude; RightWingNilla
It is considered, on FR, appropriate to ping the individual to your post if you talk about them personally.

What is considered appropiate on FR is explicitly published by Jim Robinson, near the end of the FR home page. This list does not include righteously symmetric pinging behavior.

As a frequent recipient of the under-the-radar approach to argumentation, I would many times have appreciated it if it were on the list, but it ain't, and it oughten't--it's a silly restriction on freewheeling public discussion that pretty much only a kindergarten teach who has come to see fairness as the be-all of existence, or an annoyingly prissy spinster librarian would appreciate the value of.

463 posted on 11/27/2005 2:27:55 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Especially, when you are criticized by people who can't spell "penecillin"

Well what do expect from low-level thinking insect workers?

464 posted on 11/27/2005 2:28:59 PM PST by RightWingNilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: donh
only a kindergarten teach who has come to see fairness as the be-all of existence, or an annoyingly prissy spinster librarian would appreciate the value of.

Spot on again Don.

465 posted on 11/27/2005 2:30:09 PM PST by RightWingNilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
I quote from two posts in a row from you:

Especially, when you are criticized by people who can't spell "penecillin"[sic]

...

I'm just pointing out the desperate attempt to discredit your argument through red herring.

466 posted on 11/27/2005 2:30:44 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: RightWingNilla
Well what do expect from low-level thinking insect workers?

That is a ten foot pole that I'm not using.

467 posted on 11/27/2005 2:32:15 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: donh; CarolinaGuitarman
If you have been politely asked to terminate a discussion with someone, than, indeed, it is bad manners, though by no means a hanging offense, to "talk behind their back".

How about mentioning you on another thread?

468 posted on 11/27/2005 2:32:50 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: donh
I quote from two posts in a row from you:

Good! Sauce, goose, gander.

469 posted on 11/27/2005 2:33:44 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

And since neither of us asked the other to terminate a discussion, your point is moot. :)


470 posted on 11/27/2005 2:35:48 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
"Kansas Provost David Shulenburger said Wednesday that he regretted the words Mirecki used but that he supported the professor and thought the course would be taught in a professional manner."

Yeah. Sure. Right. "Professional". Check.

F**king idiots. Fire 'em all and start over.

471 posted on 11/27/2005 2:37:35 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Re: Your #6: No, that point was lost here at all.


472 posted on 11/27/2005 2:39:42 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
"Somebody email Senator Brownlee a copy of the First Amendment."

Uh-huh. Well pal, I have my copy here. Now..........tell us all what you'd like to say about it. This ought to be good. Fire when ready.

473 posted on 11/27/2005 2:40:50 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I was speaking more generally, not about penicillin in particular.

OK...could you specify, oh, half a dozen medical breakthroughs that we should blame directly and obviously on trained mathematicians, rather than trained medical biologists, such as Fleming, Pauling, or Pasteur? Could you perhaps identify the mathematicians who were directly responsible for Pasteur's germ theory of disease? Pauling's (a chem major) major breakthroughs?

474 posted on 11/27/2005 2:40:58 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
How about mentioning you on another thread?

Also not covered in the rules specified by Jim Robinson on the home page. Why don't you just read it instead of asking me?

475 posted on 11/27/2005 2:43:24 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

Glad to hear it. At the time I posted my comment no one, unless I'm mistaken, had mentioned it.


476 posted on 11/27/2005 2:43:49 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
"Huh. I thought I was reading DU there for a second, what with these being the sort of whines you get from the Left. Sad to see them coming from those supposedly on the Right."

"Whining", now, is it..........when yet more eduassholes decide to sit in their professorial chairs and hurl scatching attacks and insults at my faith? the faith of untold millions around the world? while taxpayers pay these assholes' salaries?

If you don't understand any of this, then do me a personal favor: just sit back, shut up, and don't further embarrass yourself.

477 posted on 11/27/2005 2:45:11 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: donh
You'll forgive me if I don't have the whole of scientific history at my fingertips. Molecular structure is mathematical, as to specific credit, I believe that has been lost in the tide.

You are still arguing utility. That is fine as far as it goes, but I suspect we are at cross-purposes at this point.

478 posted on 11/27/2005 2:46:02 PM PST by AmishDude (Your corporate slogan could be here! FReepmail me for my confiscatory rates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: Quark2005
Naturalistic causation and attribution of causation to God are one in the same, in my book - only the former is subject to empirical study, though.

Good post, Quark!

One difference is that we assume (quantum mechanics and chaotic systems aside for the moment) that on the whole, nature is deterministic--once you have a formulation for a body dropped from height X on planet Y, with known wind resistance Z, you can pretty much reproduce it. Hence mass production, engineering, etc.--in short all the "practical" things which make Western life so comfortable, in defiance of the "noble savage" ideal.

OTOH, God does what He pleases, and "reserves the right" to interfere at any time. These are called (variously) "miracles" or "mythology" according to whether we lend credence to the source, the supernatural person or agent involved, or the action which that Deity is said to have performed.

One other difference is that miracles are usually embedded in history, rather than taking place in a controlled environment subject to repetition and verification. I.e. despite the Saturday Night Live skit, we can't really re-create the Battle of Waterloo, only this time give Napoleon a B-52. Likewise, we can't go back to Jericho and have the army march around blowing their trumpets only six times; nor (as Isaac Asimov suggested) look for sappers undermining the city walls.

Cheers!

479 posted on 11/27/2005 2:46:33 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Computers are used to find certain structures and whether they exist but they can't be used in any way when there are an infinite number of postulates (Fermat's last, for example).

Oh, come OFF it already.

People write infinite loops all the time. (Some Cray supercomputers were able to complete an infinite loop in Fortran in under 2 seconds :-P )

Cheers!

480 posted on 11/27/2005 2:48:39 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 621-625 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson