Posted on 11/22/2005 12:50:53 PM PST by oldtimer2
The Nation's Pulse
Rage and Righteousness
By Ralph R. Reiland
11/22/2005 12:04:42 AM
In judging the electorate that turned him out of office, state Supreme Court Justice Russell Nigro said Pennsylvania's voters were "blinded by rage."
In fact, it was the exact opposite. In a welcome change, the voters took off their blinders and could clearly see an entrenched political class in Pennsylvania that has become increasingly pretentious, over-paid, and corrupt.
As a case in point, directly related to Nigro, the voters, rather than being "blinded by rage," saw a judiciary that has turned a blind eye for decades as our politicians took illegal pay hikes by way of so-called "unvouchered expenses," a practice that's a clear violation of a provision in the state Constitution that forbids lawmakers from increasing their salaries during their current terms in office.
In the underhanded world of Pennsylvania politics where one money-grubbing hand washes the other, "unvouchered expenses" means the politicians get their salary increases illegally and prematurely through reimbursements for expenses that don't exist while the judges flash a green light to the practice and pocket their own pay hikes.
A thought by Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850), a French journalist and economist and an early activist for free markets, is pertinent to our current situation in Pennsylvania. "When law and morality contradict each other," he wrote, "the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law."
It might be something that Mr. Nigro can't grasp, but what happened on Election Day is that more voters in Pennsylvania than normal decided against losing their moral sense. They said the 16 percent to 54 percent pay raises that the Legislature awarded to itself in a no-debate, no-public input, middle-of-the-night vote were wrong, and that it was wrong for politicians to grab the money more than a year early by means of reimbursements for imaginary expenses, and wrong for the judiciary to be go-along cronies in the entire illicit process.
Rather than being "blinded by rage," voters appropriately concluded that "losing respect for the law" is exactly the right response when the law is wrong. Similarly, losing respect for politicians is exactly the right response when lawmakers turn into a collective of perpetual lawbreakers.
Before it was a beer, Samuel Adams was a leader in the fight against British colonial rule and a signer of the Declaration of Independence. In fighting an entrenched and self-aggrandizing political power, Adams had this advice: "Be not intimidated, nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberties by any pretense of politeness, delicacy, or decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery, and cowardice."
Choosing sides in a battle between political subjugation and individual sovereignty, said Adams, is to choose sides between slavery and freedom: "If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; may your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
The danger, always, is for those who are ahead of the crowd, those who see early an emperor without clothes, and say it. Historically, it's those groundbreakers, those willing to speak with candor, those disposed to be the targets of embedded authorities and ingrained prejudices, who have been essential in the advances of liberty and societal evolution.
Again, from Samuel Adams, and directly applicable to those relatively few in Pennsylvania who started the ball rolling against the pay hike shenanigans that transpired in Harrisburg in the wee hours of July 7: "It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."
John Adams, another early patriot in the American revolution, and later the first Vice President of the United States and the second President of the United States, warned of the obsession that those in control have to eliminate any and all beliefs that they see as either frightening or erroneous: "The jaws of power are always open to devour, and her arm is always stretched out, if possible, to destroy the freedom of thinking, speaking, and writing."
Still, the larger danger, as America's Founders cautioned, was in doing nothing, doing nothing in the face of growing absolutism, nothing as restraints on self-determination become more suffocating, nothing as the acts of malice become more sordid and the roots of repression grow deeper.
Ralph R. Reiland is the B. Kenneth Simon Professor of Free Enterprise at Robert Morris University in Pittsburgh.
The legislature got the message and within a week they recinded the law.
The same group is pushing to have every incumbent legislator voted out next year in regular election. I would not bet against them.
Speaking of getting back at judges. There are more than enough signatures being turned in to get Gay Marriage on the ballot in MA.
mark
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." -- Samuel Adams
This certainly describes the Democratic party of this generation to a "T"
"John Murtha; white courtesy phone....John Murtha; white courtesy phone!"
Is THIS the best description of the DemonRATs and the Lamestream Mediots that you have EVER seen written?
It also describes the OBL-ers here too!
Voters having another "Temper Tantrum".
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; may your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
Kipling?
no silly....it was in the article, a quote from Samuel Adams. : )
oops. slinks away.
lol!
I bet we could find some appropriate Kipling remarks though..... : )
Maybe it wasn't my error but a technical glitch ala CNN. Yeah, that's the ticket.
yeah....it's CNN's fault. : )
How's this?:
"Borrow trouble for yourself, if that's your nature, but don't lend it to your neighbors."
or
"Politicians. Little Tin Gods on Wheels. "
Rudyard Kipling
"Borrow trouble for yourself, if that's your nature" I can relate to that one. I tend to want to own rather than borrow trouble.
yes...and a trouble maker, never you are, yes? : )
Yes, it certainly does.
That's the conclusion I've reached - not only on FR but in day to day battles here in Arizona where the socialists and Communists try to label us all sorts of things. Sticks and stones can break my bones, but words will never hurt me. Now that I have my first few battle scars at least, it's prepared me for further war.
I'm not holding my breath waiting to get a chance to vote on it. Legislators in this state are so scared of the homosexual lobby, which has the force of the Boston Globe supporting it, that they don't want to have to make the decision allowing it come up for a vote of the people. The homosexuals in this state are worried that, even though people are tolerant, if they are allowed to vote, there are some things that they won't accept, and homosexual marriage is one of those things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.