Posted on 11/22/2005 12:44:07 PM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo
Ever notice how the anti-evolutionists have nothing to add to these discussions in the way of evidence or research, but are very fond of spewing long bigoted tirades against people who actually understand science?
Now, now, Ichne... anyone that can string random words together to simulate a sentence can't be a complete dolt.
I don't know which meaningless phrase is funnier -- "deolutionary" or "decivilizing narcissism."
First of all, there is no "darwinism" and if there was it would be capitalized.
You'll get "equal time" when you have "equal evidence". Get *THAT*?
Yes I get that crystal clear. ID has a way to go to match up with fossils and DNA and the host of other evidence directly supporting Natural Selection. When ID has "equal evidence" it deserves equal time. That is not the case here in late 2005.
In the scientific world credibility is gained through evidence, experimentation, and peer review. Please state your evidence, experimentation, and/or peer review of the previous ID "science". On it's own merits, ID has no credibility as a scientific theory whatsoever.
In the scientific world credibility is gained through evidence, experimentation, and peer review. Please state your evidence, experimentation, and/or peer review of the previous ID "science". On it's own merits, ID has no credibility as a scientific theory whatsoever. I'm not "blocking the aisle". I'm not defensive or paranoid about Natural Selection. I'm merely asking, "Why you demand to bring the supernatural into a science classroom?"
BTW: I'm going to start a lawsuit to throw out the "Theory of Gravity" and substitute it with the "Angels push things down to keep it from drifting up into heaven theory". Should that get as much space in the "aisle" as ID?
BTW: I'm going to start a lawsuit to throw out the "Theory of Gravity" and substitute it with the "Angels push things down to keep it from drifting up into heaven theory". Should that get as much space in the "aisle" as ID?
The Theory Of Intelligent Falling could also be offered as an alternative.
Ask your leadership. They know.
I dont know - Try it
"BTW: I'm going to start a lawsuit to throw out the "Theory of Gravity" and substitute it with the "Angels push things down to keep it from drifting up into heaven theory". Should that get as much space in the "aisle" as ID?"
There is no gravity- the earth sucks.
"You don't know what you don't know...lots of threads for many years before 2004."
I know what I DO know, and that is that you're completely wrong.
And, let's say that you are right, that we all ignore out of hand all arguments from creationist websites and don't even attempt to answer them (this is nonsense, and I've been here long enough to know (and I lurked for a few years before I signed up), but I'll play along for the sake of argument).
I said this,
"It doesn't matter if the site is biased; what matters is the substance of the arguments put forth. Creationist sites are equally biased against evolution."
Of this exact statement you said,
"I happen to agree with you, at least the point you made that I quoted here."
For you to say that, and when you came here and said,
"Your source is biased, thus, totally disqualified."
makes you a hypocrite. It shouldn't matter if you think that WE dismiss creationist sites(and their arguments) out of hand; why are you condemning us for something you yourself have done?
"Your source is biased, thus, totally disqualified."
We won't forget you said that.
"Ask your leadership. They know."
Second time; I have no *leadership*.
a) Both creation and evolution websites are credible and can equally be used as qualified reference sites
*or*
b) Only the pro-evolution sites are credible and can be used as qualified reference sites
Your leadership wants to know how you vote...
Outstanding work!
Hey, can I still ping ?
Ogre, darwinists need to grow up and stop wetting their pants over Intelligent Design. Supernatural ID belongs in any classroom where "Truth" in the origins of man is being persued. Why are darwinists so frightened of allowing competing views to be explored. Doesn't it bother you, make you feel a little uneasy that darwinists will even go to the extreme of trying to have teachers and/or administrators fired for attempting to introduce ID concepts to students? What is the matter with you people? You try to "morph" a boneheaded, "band aided" theory into a legitimate field of science and then claim to have an exclusive grip on wisdom, claim that the Genesis account of Creation is mythology.
St Paul,in his epistle to the Romans (Rom 1:22) speaking of man down through the ages states: "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and...". Ogre, do you really believe that a foolish bunch of delusional darwinist pseudo scientists can outsmart God and veto the Genesis account?
Anti-QuantumQuack Sarcasm Torpedo ARMED. FIRE!!
Yikes. After you've extracted the energy, do the various quantum mechanical operators suddenly start commuting?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.