[NewLand]

So which one is it:

a) Both creation and evolution websites are credible and can equally be used as qualified reference sites

*or*

b) Only the pro-evolution sites are credible and can be used as qualified reference sites

Your leadership wants to know how you vote...

[CarolinaGuitarman]

Nice attempted duck of your hypocrisy.

"So which one is it:

a) Both creation and evolution websites are credible and can equally be used as qualified reference sites

*or*

b) Only the pro-evolution sites are credible and can be used as qualified reference sites "

Neither A nor B. I judge the argument, not the source. You on the other hand reject the argument when it comes from a source you don't like without addressing the merits of the argument itself. That's why you said,

"Your source is biased, thus, totally disqualified."

You are hypocrite enough to condemn others for allegedly doing the same thing with creationist websites.

I'm not going to play your games any more. You have shown yourself to be dishonest and unworthy of debate. Go bother someone else with your evasions and prevarications.

And in case you don't get it, don't ping me again on this thread. I have better things to do.