Posted on 11/22/2005 5:45:52 AM PST by Liz
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says the high court did not inject itself into the 2000 presidential election.
.......Scalia said: "The election was dragged into the courts by the Gore people. We did not go looking for trouble." .........the court had to take the case.
"The issue was whether Florida's Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court [would decide the election.] What did you expect us to do? Turn the case down because it wasn't important enough?"
(Scalia) contended there would have been a difficult transition had the court not stepped in....... (and that) studies by news organizations.....showed Bush still would have won a Florida recount
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
As far as the Florida legislators not stepping up, I recall differently than you. They were prepared to assign electors for Bush. But the USSC made that unnecessary. At least that's what I recall.
Those stupid goreites! : )
Who asked Jesse Jackson to come down to Florida to stage a fake protest about blacks being turned away at the polls?
Algore.
Who tried to get overseas ballots disqualified?
Algore
Who used every trick in the book to get unpunched ballot cards recounted in his favor?
Algore
Who used every trick in the book to get ballot cards recounted over and over?
Algore
It was the Algore who started that whole chad crap and it was Algore who tried to steal the election and you can see it on his fat face nowdays.
OWNED
OUCH!!!!
He's disgusting. Bloated and bitter, reminds me of Murdering Drunkard Kennedy.
good comparison.
Al Gore is many things: a jerk, a pompous ass, an enviro-whacko. Maybe he can't help those things, it's the way God made him. But, dragging the country through a six-week court battle trying to steal an election and fostering a Constitutional crisis and forever starting the 'Bush was appointed' mantra was entirely his doing and for this he should be damned.
But all those people who voted for Buchanan meant to vote for Gore! Can't we just have another election? Thinking back on those days makes my blood boil, the nightly insanity on the news, the Gore family playing touch football...... There were some high points though: Freepers chanting outside the Veep's residence 'get out of Cheney's house!'
I remember seing Bill Bennett on O'Reilly, in the first days after election day, saying this would have to go to the Supreme Court to get resolved. As with all things liberals are involved in, adjudication would be necessary. Dang if he wasn't right on. The SCOFLA legislated from the bench in an outrageous manner.
Nixon - with more legitimate right in 1960 than Gore ever had in 2000 - could have challenged the election results in Illinois; and his friends and allies suggested he make that challenge. He chose not to, telling his friends that no matter what the outcome of such a challenge brought, neither he nor Kennedy would win because the political process of the challenge would leave the "victorious" President and the nation badly crippled in the process. At that point in time, Nixon was a statesman. Gore was a power hungry ass.
Good summary.
This statement is long overdue. The Democrats have basically been calling all the Justices that that voted on Bush's side cheaters for 5 years.
And the butterfly ballot was too confusing! If you court voters who are to stupid to vote, that's what you get!
Rats also conveniently forget that the essential SCOTUS ruling was a 7-2 vote - that the SCOFL-ordered recount violated the 14th Amendment. The 5-4 ruling was on the less important issue, that Florida would not have time to conduct a constitutionally proper statewide recount in time for the state to certify its electors by the constitutionally-mandated deadline of December 13th. That ruling did "end the election," but Bush would have won anyway had the recount been allowed. The SCOTUS simply refused to ignore the plain text of the constitution which required electoral votes to be certified by December 13.
The Rats were "hoist on their own petard" with this ruling. Had they immediately demanded a statewide hand recount with uniform vote-counting standards, it would have survived a GOP legal challenge and been done by Dec. 13. Of course, Bush would have won it, which is why the Rats didn't ask for it in the first place.
IIRC, they did argue for states' rights during the civil rights movement in the 50's and/or 60's. They were in favor of states' rights in order to deny equal rights to blacks. So, you see, they are capable of being legally correct if they can turn it to an evil purpose.
Thank goodness Scalia had the guts to step up to the plate.
"Are you suggesting that the results were determined by "lawyering" rather than by the facts?"
The Gore team made a really stupid mistake - calling for recounts in only certain counties rather than the whole state - there was law to back up a whole state recount.
But honestly, in the end, the election was decided by who had a 5 person majority on the supreme court. One more liberal justice and Gore would might well have been President.
That's a "rotary" phone on the table behind him.
You do know that's not really Al Gore in that photo, right? :o)
In hindsight, the legislature damn well should have done so instead of letting it fall into a quirky courst system. The ultimate example of judicial activism.
Election 2000 really made me give thanks to God in ways I never had. I know this will drive some people nuts, but I still think Bush was selected by God not elected by the people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.