Posted on 11/22/2005 5:24:24 AM PST by paudio
CAIRO, Egypt Leaders of Iraq's sharply divided Shiites, Kurds and Sunnis called Monday for a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S.-led forces in the country and said Iraq's opposition had a "legitimate right" of resistance.
The final communique, hammered out at the end of three days of negotiations at a preparatory reconciliation conference under the auspices of the Arab League, condemned terrorism, but was a clear acknowledgment of the Sunni position that insurgents should not be labeled as terrorists if their operations do not target innocent civilians or institutions designed to provide for the welfare of Iraqi citizens.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I wouldn't be so hopeful about winning the war if the battle for Iraq were lost. While it's true that we still won the cold war after losing Vietnam (with the help of the MSM), I'd be quite discouraged about this war's progress after a MSM-inspired defeat in Iraq that could lead to lots of nasty scenarios. The main difference between a premature exit from Vietnam and one from Iraq is that the Islamofascists will pursue.
I like the way you put that, but is not the opposite true as well. Will medieval islam just toss in the towel...or will it undertake to subvert the newly democratic Iraq just as it does the rest of the world?
Perhaps a major base in each major region of the country, away from populated areas. We could get it down to 3 or 4 large hubs easily. From there, we could provide the Iraqi military and police with all the air, intelligence, logistics, and training they'd ever need.
It's a win/win scenario for everyone. We'll stop taking casualties and the Iraqis will get their country back. The insurgents, on the other hand, will be stuck in rebellion against an Arab government, not a foriegn army.
bttt
2050, that should cycle the population
Thanks DS... My thoughts too.
OK I condemn it but it ain't time to "bring them home"... even with an exclamation point.
This is just politics before the election. They'll shut their trap after it. Doesn't come at a good time though. They could at least understand what's going on over here.
I wouldn't be so hopeful about winning the war if the battle for Iraq were lost.
I wouldn't either, but we're not actually losing (hence the quotes around 'lose the battle'). The media will try and portray, for domestic political purposes, that the Democrats demanded a withdrawl, we withdrew, ergo, the Democrats won.
Let them think that all they want. History will prove them wrong.
The real battle is for Iraq's future, not to maintain the U.S. occupation indefinitely. The Democrats can pretend that once we pull out, we lose, but that's not the case. We win or lose defined by the success of the Iraqi government to function as a moderate republic. The Democrats are opposing what they percieve our victory conditions to be, not our real ones.
"With islam,there must be war,and there can be only one winner."I agree."Either real islam comes to dominate...or it is defeated and expunged."I prefer "defeated and expunged".Over the last couple yrs,with all that has gone on,what i've read,etc,etc,i've come to the conclusion that islam,and Christian/Judeo(aka civilized)society's simply can't peacefully coexist.
While it may not be the correct path, at least they're participating (finally) in a plan to bring this to an end.
It still has to be handled diplomatically. You deal with this group but make it clear that the government to be elected next month is the final arbitor.
Agreed. But the media is one front on this war and one we should not ignore. Vietnam was a loss not because we pulled out but because we cut off aid and the South collapsed. A MSM inspired, Democrat controlled legislature could do the same thing a couple of years down the road. That coupled with an Iranian invation... This would leave a lot of people saying it wasn't worth it, we should mind our own business, etc. Of course that's only one scenario. I'm agreeing wholeheartedly with what you are writing, I'm just pointing out that MSM spin should not be ignored but addressed head-on.
They will indeed. The vast majority of Iraqis have no desire to wind up with a theocratic goverment like Iran. So long as Iraq remains a republic, it won't. As in the rest of the world, the extremists are a small, small percentage of the population. Sunnis may be willing to sit back and let the wack jobs do their dirty work for them, as far as fighting the foriegn invaders, but they have no intention of letting them actually run the government.
There is a certain nationalistic / Arab pride that many Sunnis feel when they see us attacked. That's why a blind eye is turned towards them. Once we're out of the picture, the dynamic changes entirely. If we were conqured by the Soviets, and you saw gang members fighting them in the streets, you'd feel the same way. Still, once the Soviets pulled out, you wouldn't vote in a Crip or Blood as mayor. Same principal involved here, as well.
OK what's your advice?
I have already given my advise concerning this debacle at least twice in my posts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.