Posted on 11/20/2005 5:28:55 PM PST by Daralundy
This is quite a smack-down for one of the most famous reporters in the world.
Must be more to it.
Add actors/actresses to your list too.
Don't you have to have Credibility before you can lose it?? They know his testimony is going to sink Fitzmas.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
...Yeah, Right! ...this is just a CYA exercise...IF they meant it, they'd fire the guy..
Isn't that like some old, skanky diseased whore trying to protect/assert her "Virtue"?
That was lost LONG ago, sweetie....now; about that "'round the world"....
..interviewing the (recently :) dead. ..Bill Casey
Ah, yes, I remember: "Come closer, son...I have something vitally important -- cough, cough -- to tell you..."
If the whole damned lot of liberal reporters withheld evetrything they ever thought they knew, would a tree have fallen in the forest? Would a firefly have flown. Would an anything done anything other than what it would have done anyway. Useless lot, these mediapeckerheadedbasturds.
From the article: "He made a mistake going on television, giving his opinions about the investigation. ... He shouldn't have been expressing those opinions," Downie added on CNN's "Reliable Sources."
Translated: He should only have been expressing opinions that would reflect negatively on Rove/Bush/Libby/Cheney. How dare he cross the MSM! How dare he say, based on his own knowledge and observations, that Fitzy was making much ado about nothing!
Woodward commits MSM heresy!
Don't forget to add Ithaca, NY; Madison, WI; and the Peoples Democratic Republic of Arlington, VA to your list.
"Asked on "Fox News Sunday" if he ever spoke to Woodward about Plame, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said, "No, of course not." Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice issued a similar denial through a spokesman on Saturday."
I gotta say- I was giggling at Rummy today. Of course, he was giggling when Wallace asked him about this. Did you hear what he said? He said that at first he refused any interviews with Woodward, then the President asked him to do them. Rummy agreed, but everything had to be on the record and he insisted on a transcript. Rummy said the transcripts prove he said nothing to Woodward. Good for Rummy!
Perhaps all Bush administration officials can take a lesson from Rummy. Every conversation is on the record and they must insist on a transcript!
Leave out Rin Tin Tin and Lassie.
Besides, no one would believe them if they did!
Woodward watched the game being played. Novak did it different. He wrote the article to cover his butt over what he saw as a Political Media plot.
I think Woodward did the right thing by waiting. It may get us to the truth. Wapo would have blown it.
Many of these "journalists" at the Wa Post don't like the sweetheart deal Woodward has where he basically gets to write books and make a bunch of money. They were ok with it as long as he criticized republicans. Now that he criticized Fitz instead of Bush, the jealousy is in the open for all to see.
Credibility? That's a laugh!
On March 23rd The Washington Post joined with thirty five other media organisations in filing an Amici Curae brief in the US Appeals Court for the District of Columbia in defense of Judith Miller that claimed that Ms Plame did not qualify as a covert agent and that there was no crime in discussing her status. The brief was well reasoned and quite explicit. http://www.bakerlaw.com/files/tbl_s10News/FileUpload44/10159/Amici%20Brief%20032305%20(Final).PDF
Now, Woodward is rebuked for not revealing that he was involved in something that the Washington Post pleaded before the court was nothing at all in the first place.
Obviously. But that is beneath. What is happening on the surface? Taken at face value, what is the meaning of the ombudsman's rebuke? Woodward shouldn't be discussing what everyone else is discussing? Just because he had one piece of inside information that is insignificant except for how the chronology happens to bear on the case?
If Judy Miller of the Times had done anything like this, she would have been, oops. Never mind!
LOL! ...It seems, Facts/Truth Still don't matter to the WaPo...except when its' convenient.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.