Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Post rebukes Bob Woodward
Reuters via CNN ^ | November 20, 2005

Posted on 11/20/2005 5:28:55 PM PST by Daralundy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Daralundy
said the newspaper took a "hit to its credibility"

Snort.

What credibility?

41 posted on 11/21/2005 3:30:51 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calrighty

Woodward is a hero IMHO. He has singlehandedly derailed the MSM-Hitlery Express that Clinton's CIA allies had so carefully crafted with the Plame-Wilson affair in their strategy to sieze the Whitehouse in 2008.


42 posted on 11/21/2005 3:31:39 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

Saturday morning on NPR, around 9:10 am EST, NPR commentator Daniel Shore was asked by another NPR commentator if he thought Woodward did anything wrong. As I heard it, Mr. Shore answered "I don't like talking about what's right and wrong, especially about my colleagues."


43 posted on 11/21/2005 5:22:56 AM PST by polymuser (I wish the Republicans had a majority in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

[One of the best-known investigative reporters in the United States, Woodward revealed last week that he testified under oath to special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald that a senior Bush administration official told him in mid-June 2003 about CIA operative Valerie Plame's position at the agency.

Woodward revealed last week that he testified under oath to special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald that a senior]


So Fitzy boy definitely knew that vals position was already comprimised well before 2003. Oh fitzy boy. Who do you really work for?


44 posted on 11/21/2005 5:28:59 AM PST by kindred (Democrat terrorist politicians have allied with Islamic terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society; Miss Marple; Peach

You're gonna love this...


45 posted on 11/21/2005 5:31:27 AM PST by ABG(anybody but Gore) (This tagline is under remodeling, thank you for your patience...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: chilepepper

I see you "get" it !


46 posted on 11/21/2005 5:47:49 AM PST by calrighty (. Troops BTTT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kindred; Howlin
"One of the best-known investigative reporters in the United States, Woodward revealed last week that he testified under oath to special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald that a senior Bush administration official told him in mid-June 2003 about CIA operative Valerie Plame's position at the agency."

Maybe I do not get it, how is this not bad for the Administration? Doesn't Woodwards testimony reinforce what Fitzmorris is already after? A high level Administration official 'outing' a CIA official.

The June 2003 time line fits within a month of the Novak story and the calls between Cooper / Miller and Libby.

I would feel much better if Woodward had testified that a former Clinton official or Kerry campaign flunky had told him this earlier than the June 2003 time frame.

47 posted on 11/21/2005 9:48:41 AM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 7mmMag@LeftCoast

The person who told him was Richard Armitage, who along with Colin Powell was considered a moderate within the administration and not part of Dick Cheney's neo-con "cabal." This indicates that the leak was just water-cooler gossip, not part of a vast neo-con conspiracy to out Valerie Plame. Of equal importance, it demonstrates how very far from a thorough or fair-and-balanced investigation Fitzgerald conducted since his narrow focus appears to have been on Dick Cheney's office rather than considering that many in the media and in the Washington social elite actually already knew full well who Valerie Plame was.


48 posted on 11/21/2005 10:16:50 AM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

How about termination?


49 posted on 11/21/2005 12:01:03 PM PST by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

They'd have to change their name. He's the franchise.


50 posted on 11/21/2005 3:40:19 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

We'll see what the stockholders have to say about it.


51 posted on 11/21/2005 10:53:17 PM PST by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Inyokern

That's about it; yes.


52 posted on 11/21/2005 10:55:46 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvey

Wrote a pretty fair book about President Bush.


53 posted on 11/21/2005 10:58:00 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson