1 posted on
11/18/2005 3:30:17 PM PST by
seastay
To: seastay
Giuliani will never be nominated. He's not just too liberal, he's way, way too liberal.
And I actually have met him and like him personally.
2 posted on
11/18/2005 3:33:25 PM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: seastay
Giulani is for gun control. Condi is AGAINST it. Waaaaay against it.
"I am a 2nd Amendment absolutist!" -- Condoleezza Rice
4 posted on
11/18/2005 3:37:11 PM PST by
FreeKeys
( "There is nothing normal about Hillary Clinton" -- Dick Morris)
To: seastay
And "blah, blah". Sounds like some political hack pollster who'd like to see Hilary win in '08 because it's a "cast in stone, take it to the bank" fact that the conservative base sits that one out.
To: seastay
Great, another election where the candidates battle over the title of "Who SUCKS the Least".
7 posted on
11/18/2005 3:39:34 PM PST by
xrp
(Conservative votes are to Republicans what 90% of black votes are to Democrats (taken for granted))
To: seastay
A liberal beating a liberal?
8 posted on
11/18/2005 3:40:47 PM PST by
NapkinUser
("It is a damn poor mind indeed which can think of only one way to spell a word." -Andrew Jackson)
To: seastay
Anything but Clinton. However...
455 respondents
Not enough respondents. An accurate statistic requires 1,500 respondents to get a +/- 3.
9 posted on
11/18/2005 3:41:42 PM PST by
Falconspeed
(Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others. Robert Louis Stevenson)
To: seastay
Winning ticket in 2008: Allen/Giuliani
16 posted on
11/18/2005 3:49:47 PM PST by
Nasher
To: seastay
What's his position on the murder of unborn children?
23 posted on
11/18/2005 4:17:56 PM PST by
Doe Eyes
I really hate these Giuliani/Rice threads. They bring out the political ignoramuses on FR.
I've got to quit stepping in them.
26 posted on
11/18/2005 4:30:37 PM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: seastay
In addition to providing excellent educational experiences for students, recent Canisius College polls have proved to be extremely accurate... A general election poll of Pennsylvania voters on October 17-18, 2004, also with a +/- 4.8 percent margin of error, gave Kerry a 53 percent 45 percent lead. On November 2, Kerry did indeed win Pennsylvania with 50 percent of the vote to George Bushs 48 percent. With a margin of error +/- 4.8, it means the numbers may deviate almost 10 points. And they consider survey numbers of K 53% and B 45% against K 50% and B 48% extremely accurate?
27 posted on
11/18/2005 4:32:01 PM PST by
paudio
(Four More Years..... Let's Use Them Wisely...)
To: seastay
That's nice. That means a real conservative will be able to slaughter Hildebeast in the actual election.
28 posted on
11/18/2005 6:34:08 PM PST by
Mogollon
(Contempt prior to investigation assures Everlasting Ignorance)
To: seastay
29 posted on
11/19/2005 1:20:01 AM PST by
jocon307
To: seastay
*Former Majority Leader Tom DeLay is seen as favorable by 18 percent and unfavorable by 40 percent, while 43 percent do not know his name. Neither are other congressional leaders household names, with majorities polled not recognizing names including Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (52 percent), Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (58 percent) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (51 percent). Evaluations of these congressional leaders were split. So in other words, this was a poll of 455 IDIOTS, none of whom ought to be able to vote.
It does however bring up an intersting point about the potential Hillary candidacy.
37 posted on
11/19/2005 8:47:44 PM PST by
Ethrane
("semper consolar")
To: seastay
Left wing dream election...
Why bother with this liberal hypothetical?
To: seastay
Poll Shows Giuliani over Clinton in 2008 Presidential Match-UpI bet this is a push poll to get Rudy nominated so that he may chase the base out of the Republican party and then lose to Hillary.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson