Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Everybody LOVES Michael Barone!

He makes the whole mess comprehensible!

1 posted on 11/17/2005 6:12:46 PM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: YaYa123

Yes, an excellent read. I especially like that last paragraph. I'm not sure if I can quote it here without exceeding the permissible limit.


3 posted on 11/17/2005 6:19:31 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

Thanks, this is the best writing yet on this subject.


7 posted on 11/17/2005 6:23:16 PM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

This whole thing is quite silly. CIA info is not secret to the White House. If you send your husband on a mission and he comes back LYING that Dick Cheney sent him, obviously people are going to mention what really happened. Seems to me she is a villain at a tile of war for not stepping forward to set the record straight. And she is such a creep that she still hasn't done so.


8 posted on 11/17/2005 6:26:47 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
The CIA had intelligence screwed up royally before 9/11. It has been trying to cover up matters ever since. The libs who castrated the CIA during the Clinton years, during the administration that opposed a funtional CIA, who now occupy the seats at Foggy Bottom and elsewhere only to get a paycheck and who still oppose a useful espionage agency, are plotting the discrediting of GWB and this administration. They do so to protect their own joke jobs as evidenced by Valerie Plame recommending her liar husband for a job for which he was not competent.

The CIA has become anti-American. Is that possible?

10 posted on 11/17/2005 6:30:15 PM PST by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
"..It appears that Woodward's source outed Woodward to Fitzgerald, and Woodward gave sworn testimony to Fitzgerald this past Monday..."

If that is true Woodward's source can't be Chaney.

11 posted on 11/17/2005 6:32:09 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

Wow! The article speculates that the source was Colin Powell! Now I'm sure Fitzgerald is dying to indict Powell. Not. And I'm sure people can easily say Powell was part of a smear campaign. Not.


12 posted on 11/17/2005 6:32:16 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

"Defenders of Fitzgerald's indictment can argue that its charges that Libby lied still stand. But the differing recollections of Woodward and Pincus could strengthen a defense based on faulty memory, and Woodward's disclosure refutes the timeline that Fitzgerald presented at his press conference."

Well...it looks like Fitzgerald has some splanin to do.


17 posted on 11/17/2005 6:53:30 PM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

So, why doe the LMSM just ask Mr. Powell a simple question, was it you who was Woodhead's source???????


19 posted on 11/17/2005 6:57:13 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

It is comforting to know that he shares the same analysis of the situation that I do. I admire that man's mind.


20 posted on 11/17/2005 6:57:22 PM PST by McGavin999 (Reporters write the Truth, Journalists write "Stories")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
Mebbe Woodward can play Robert Redford again in the movie version of this soap opera! Who'd play Dustin, though?


22 posted on 11/17/2005 6:59:38 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

Whoooaoaooaooaooo.....

Barone is absolutely on fire! News analysis at its very best!


23 posted on 11/17/2005 7:02:27 PM PST by Prost1 (If you fight, fight hard, fight dirty, fight to win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

His analysis is the most clear-cut, easy to understand explanation...withOUT political hatred and hyperbole...than any other writer...


25 posted on 11/17/2005 7:04:43 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

Woodward knew Libby was innocent and said nothing...


32 posted on 11/17/2005 7:22:20 PM PST by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
I [Barone] recall that some years ago Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan argued that the CIA should be abolished, and I argued that that was a ridiculous and irresponsible position. As usual when Pat and I disagreed, Pat turned out to be right.

Indeed. An old-fashioned Soviet-style purge is in order.

35 posted on 11/17/2005 7:31:07 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

I say Tenet.


36 posted on 11/17/2005 7:39:54 PM PST by cgk (Cheney: Senators Reid, Kerry & Rockefeller were unable to attend due to a prior lack of commitment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
Assuming this is true (CIA works to punish Bush and help the Terrorist) then those in the CIA that did this must be brought to justice and put in jail.

How many think this will happen?

Like it was said in the story the MSM is out to get our President and to help the terrorist and it would seem that certain GS employees at the CIA are doing the same thing.

Will this be investigated? Answer NO the Senate is full of cowards and their white flags are waiving.
37 posted on 11/17/2005 7:40:18 PM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
Everybody LOVES Michael Barone! He makes the whole mess comprehensible!

I especially appreciate Michael Barone's closing paragraph:

I recall that some years ago Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan argued that the CIA should be abolished, and I argued that that was a ridiculous and irresponsible position. As usual when Pat and I disagreed, Pat turned out to be right.

I'm coming to the same conclusion myself. We have many intelligence agencies. A CIA that is a rogue agency which holds itself above ANY President of the United States is a danger to the Republic.

39 posted on 11/17/2005 7:45:43 PM PST by Wolfstar (The stakes in the global war on terror are too high for politicians to throw out false charges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

Thanks, YaYa123. Remarkable story.


41 posted on 11/17/2005 7:50:28 PM PST by solzhenitsyn ("Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
I recall that some years ago Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan argued that the CIA should be abolished, and I argued that that was a ridiculous and irresponsible position. As usual when Pat and I disagreed, Pat turned out to be right.

And I suspect that Moynihan would say he's changed his mind today.

43 posted on 11/17/2005 7:57:15 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

Wow. This story kind of pulls the rug out from under the Fitzmas crowd.


45 posted on 11/17/2005 8:01:36 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson