Former senator and presidental candidate George McGovern. (File photo)
Posted on 11/14/2005 4:58:17 PM PST by SJackson
Former senator and presidental candidate George McGovern. (File photo)
The man whose candidacy for the presidency this newspaper enthusiastically championed in 1971 and 1972 returns to Madison today to deliver a distinguished lecture, and it is with great pride and pleasure that we welcome George McGovern back to the city that had the wisdom to want him - as opposed to Richard Nixon - as its president.
McGovern will deliver the University of Wisconsin Law School's Robert W. Kastenmeier Lecture at 7:30 p.m. in the Wisconsin Union Theater, 800 Langdon St. And he has chosen an appropriate theme: "The Iraq War: Lessons From the Past."
McGovern's 1972 presidential candidacy held out the promise of a rapid withdrawal of U.S. forces from the quagmire that was Vietnam. As a decorated World War II veteran - a bomber pilot - and a historian who served in both the U.S. House and the Senate for the better part of two decades, McGovern knew that ending the war and getting this country's troops out of harm's way was not merely wise but also patriotic.
Unfortunately, the 1972 campaign saw the beginning of a politics of personal destruction that warped the electoral process beyond recognition. McGovern's wisdom and patriotism were attacked by Nixon's dirty tricksters and media that portrayed the heroic World War II veteran as a wide-eyed pacifist.
McGovern lost badly. As a result, thousands of additional American soldiers and tens of thousands of additional Vietnamese civilians died needlessly.
More than 30 years later, the American political process has degenerated to an even more troubling place than it was in 1972.
In the 2004 campaign, a Vietnam War veteran, John Kerry, was portrayed as soft on national defense and unpatriotic, while a man whose family used its political connections to ensure that he would not serve in Vietnam, George Bush, was presented as the great defender of America's security in a troubled world.
A year later, the United States is sinking deeper into the quagmire that is Iraq. And there are still too few wise voices calling for the only appropriate action: the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Indeed, as McGovern arrives in Madison, President Bush is once more attempting to "sell" the case for a war that was founded on lies about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that never posed a threat.
McGovern, who from the start has been a wise and consistent critic of the Bush administration's misguided policies regarding the Middle East, has much to offer the current debate. He is a military veteran who knows the horrors of war, and who recognizes well that there are times when Americans must fight. He is, as well, a political veteran who recognizes that when an unnecessary war is spinning out of control, it is right to open a debate about how to end it.
His wisdom is needed now more than ever.
It has been a long time since we were privileged to endorse his candidacy for the presidency. But we are not inclined to withdraw it quite yet.
Indeed, were it left to this newspaper, we would gladly replace George Bush, a man who avoided serving his country in a time of war but has few qualms about sending others to die for it, with George McGovern, a man who proudly served when his country called but who has always recognized that the call must be made only when it is absolutely necessary.
So we issue our endorsement once more: McGovern for president.
More appropriate for Diana's political list, but I pinged it anyway.
If you're in the woods, unless you're knowledgeable, don't eat the mushrooms.
his comment: "Well I guess I never realized that while in Congress I passed all of those laws that made it so hard on the small businessman."
He is hopeless.
I wish the Dems would, as he'd do no better than he did in 1972.
If you don't get the joke, then consider this question: what happens when one of these gears turns?
He will loose again, again.............
As I recall, he was financed by a Ford heir.
Campaign finance reform, that couldn't happen today. While I disagreed with him, he had a major impact, ant today McGovern would never be heard.
I actually like George McGovern.
I think he's a good guy.
Not to say I would have voted for him in 1972. Besides...he's 83 years old. Nice guy though...I wish I could buy him a beer sometime.
I know I wouldn't have voted for him, because I didn't. But he was a good guy. IMO wrong on Vietnam (later right on Cambodia, where he wanted us to intercede, too late), but a courageous American who served his country bravely. The Dems don't seem to be able to come up with those types of candidates anymore.
A great map to remind some who forgot.
If McGovern runs again, I'm voting for Nixon.
Perfect! After thirty years the left still thinks McGovern is suited for the presidency.
When he's the best you've got on your bench, you're in a world of hurt.
You sure have that right. Scoop Jackson was the best of that breed and today the Democrats run in three stripes:
Stupid
Naive
Evil
...or a combination thereof.
I hope it doesn't come to that, I know nothing about what she's been doing with her life, but I'd probably vote for Trish too. As well as against Hillary.
It's sad. I could think of a few others, but you're right, they're largely gone.
Closer to 40. Remember, this is from Madison, WI. Leisure suits haven't arrived yet.
But he did become a millionaire from his real estate investments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.