[Rutles4Ever]

Disturbing, but predicted...

[dead]

Pictures?

[calrighty]

At least my dog is female..........................

[Cicero]

PETA has been disturbingly silent on these matters.

[Gay State Conservative]

If passed,this would mean that there'll be a whole lot less lawbreaking at the Kennedy and Kerry Compound's.

And as for Barney Frank......

[Darksheare]

Where are the posters who laughed and said this wouldn't happen?

[Reaganesque]

Those who jeered Santorum were silenced last Tuesday.

Don't count on it. They'll just ask for more deviancy to be permitted.

[Hoodlum91]

I am SO glad I moved from that hell-hole.

[SlowBoat407]

Counting down to thread pulling....

[gcruse]

Twenty years for doggy diddling? Yes, that's too much.

[camle]

bring on in the sheep
bring on in the sheep
we shall come rejoicing
bring on in the sheep!

[ArrogantBustard]

[Pessimist]

"Whereas the old law punished doggie-diddling and the like with hard time (a maximum sentence of 20 years) in state prison, the new measure would give activist judges the option of slapping perps with a mere two and a half years in plush local jails, or even letting zoophiliacs walk with a $5,000 fine."

Seriously... Does anyone really think screwing a dog deserves a 20 yr sentence? As bizzare as it may be, does it even deserve a 2-1/2 yr sentence or a $5000 fine?

[rellimpank]

--as sort of an aside to this, liberal icon Thomas Jefferson wrote the Virginia Constitution--which included the death penalty for sodomy--in those days clearly understood as male-male sex--

[BulletBobCo]

I'm doomed!

[NYer]

More than two and a half years ago, the nation laughed as pro-family crusader Rick Santorum predicted the consequences of legalized gay marriage: If man-on-man marriage was sanctified, man-on-child and man-on-dog unions might not be far behind.

Wonder which "church" will be the first one to offer a Blessing Ceremony?

Catholic Ping - Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list

[GovernmentShrinker]

Shouldn't our government have more important things to worry about? If the act harms the animal, then it is already well-covered by animal cruelty laws. If it doesn't harm the animal, who cares what some weirdos do with their dogs? It's not like most of the people doing this are going to be caught, so having a law against it at all will have little effect on the incidence. They should just nullify the law completely.

The notion of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars of taxpayer funds to convict and incarcerate somebody for this, is as disgusting as the act itself. There are tens of thousands of severely abused children in this country, with a skimpy crew of poorly trained social workers barely making a dent in locating and helping them. Wouldn't the hundreds of thousands of dollars be better spent on tackling that problem? You know, a REAL problem?

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

Just another gay day in Romneyland.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Is necrophilia still illegal in Massachusetts? That's a pretty archaic law. Besides, who is the victim?

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

Zoophobia!!!

{/Sarc}

[Rutles4Ever]

Um... PING