Twenty years for doggy diddling? Yes, that's too much.
gives new meaning to the phrase "doggie do"
Dog: Noble creature/Man's best friend/Lives for affection (not abuse but affection)/Willing to Lay Down Life in Defense of even Mediocre Owner/Feed 'em, pet 'em, talk nice to 'em and they love you forever, etc.
Dog/cat/goldfish-diddling libertoonians and leftists who propose legalizing pooch-abuse: Either typical Taxachusetts windtunnels or others for whom execution is tooooooo kind.
There, there, Tipperpooch, that's why God invented the Second Amendment. Don't you worry, Tipper. I fire fast and fire true and they won't get to you.
Dukakis proposed this legislation thirty years ago as a state representative in Taxachusetts. This proposal will credential on the record a new generation of Demonrat preverts and friends of theirs who can be permanently identified as was Dukakis (See Cartoon campaign book: Magical Mike Dukakis and the page referencing his bill which featured giraffes and zebras fleeing the Gay [bestiality] State).
Doggy-diddling is too much for ONLY twenty years. Mutilation, then execution by enraged pitbull/rottweiler/dobie pack. There is room in the ring for those who object. That's the ticket! Or perhaps, a traditional Salem farewell party with a stake and roaring flames!
Kitties with their claws intact will make Mr. Diddler not want to live to be tried. Can't blame 'em. Nice Kitty! Faster, pussycat, KILL, KILL!!!!
To say nothing of Viking Kitties!!!!!
Would YOU want some sick, dog-f***ing barbarian in your neighborhood after a mere 2.5 years?