Posted on 11/13/2005 10:49:10 AM PST by wagglebee
One of the centerpieces of President Bush's counter-offensive against his Iraq war critics will be a Republican National Committee commercial focusing on a speech given by former President Bill Clinton.
U.S. News & World Report says the RNC ad will spotlight Clinton's Feb. 17, 1998 speech on Iraq, where the former prez "guaranteed" that Saddam Hussein would use his weapons of mass destruction.
"Let's imagine the future," Clinton said seven years ago. "What if [Saddam] fails to comply [with U.N. sanctions], and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made?"
Clinton warned: "He will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction.
"And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal."
Other soundbytes from Democratic flip-floppers will feature WMD warnings from Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
I was somewhat amazed when I read your response. Certainly not because of the sentiment, but because your words were exactly what I was going to post.
The Dems better hope and pray that no WMD ever made it or makes it out of Iraq...
We can only pray.
The future of the Republic depends on it.
I agree (and many others have expressed the same idea), but timing is everything. Rove is a master of political timing, but I hope his debacle with Fitzgerald didn't cause him to delay this attack for too long. If this succeeds it will be a masterstroke, I just hope the left isn't able to "spin" this into a lastditch effort to salvage Bush's poll numbers.
"Rope a dope". Yea, right. If this was such a great strategy why didn't Bush pull it out during the '04 campaign? Seems to me Bush played a very bad hand and only managed to win by winning Ohio by 100,000 votes.
bump
So he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. Nice.
Perhaps someone should remind them that Halliburton is in the business of construction, not oil...
Signed by all Neo-cons
Would that be the same as "signed by all Jooos"?!
You are going to love this... PING!
First of all the are doing it with RNC advertising. The RNC has raised 81 million in the last 6 months compared to the DNC raising 31 million. The Democrats have raised only slightly more than they have spent. The republicans have raised nearly three times what they have spent. With very strong CFR limitations on the RNC spending for candidates, the question is why did they raise all those millions. They did it in just the the last six months. Not the six months before.
That says to me there was a plan for the money and a time selected for using it. Why did they raise the money? I think we now know.
MISUNDERESTIMATED AGAIN!
But we know Bubba only lied about sex. (/sarcasm)
Yes, all cut from the same cloth
Damn. Good one, Bill.
I love that post. Excellent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.