Posted on 11/13/2005 5:20:09 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, November 13th, 2005
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Sens. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): King Abdullah II of Jordan; Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean; Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.; Democratic Gov. Mark Warner of Virginia.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Sen. Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., chairwoman, National Republican Senatorial Committee; Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., chairman, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee; Rep. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y., chairman, National Republican Congressional Committee; Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., chairman, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
LATE EDITION (CNN) : National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley; Sens. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Carl Levin, D-Mich.; Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Ahmed Chalabi; Jordanian Deputy Prime Minister Marwan Muasher; Democratic Gov. Tom Vilsack of Iowa; Republican Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas.
Make that weekly. This country is at war. The populace needs a constant update.
Maybe Senator Schumer will discuss all the candidates' credit reports!
;0)
You know what, guys, we are going to win the war in Iraq, they will have their own government and security forces, our guys will all be back home and the dems will still say it's a quagmire and we are losing. I believe this will happen.
Thanks! I was worried that Juan had been eliminated from the talking points list. He's had a hard time lately repeating them correctly. There's also the question of Juan understanding them, but I won't go there.
If hitlery signals to the media that she wants Richardson for her veep, the media will never ever bring up any dirt on Richardson.
Weekly would work for me, but I think the MSM would jump on President Bush like stink on poop.
Thanks for the heads up.
Don't know Rodguy, but it's maddening to everyone on our side when these things go unchallenged.
Threat-WTC #1-Clinton didnt go to war
Threat#2 Somalia-Clinton didnt go to war
Threat#3 Al-Khobar Towers-Clinton didnt go to war
Threat#4 Military Advisory Group, Riyadh-Clinton didnt go to war
Threat#5 TWA 800/ Bojinka revealed and the plot to blow up 12 747s-Clinton didnt go to war
Threat#6 AMEMB-Nairobi and AMEMB Dar-es-Salaam-Clinton didnt go to war
And lastly threat#7 USS Cole-Clinton didnt go to war
Now the threats Clinton DID react to were:
Ken Starr
Kathleen Willey
Billy Dale
the Tobacco Industry
and Ron Brown..
How does stuck on stupid rockefeller know that what the Soldier said is not true if he never reads things before he votes on them? How can we be sure he reads anything before he makes a DNC talking point comment? Jeez I think he is bordering on Dementia.
Clinton essentially IGNORED 5 major attacks against the U.S. by terrorists, leaving us vulnerable for 9-11.
Meantime he took us to war, an ILLEGAL war without cause based on faulty intelligence, against Serbia. We as a nation then left Serbia to re-build the ruins we left behind (including many "missed targets" like an embassy, hospital, caravan of civilians, etc). Refugees are still living in "temporary camps", abandoned buildings, etc, all these years later and Serbia & Kosovo have not improved their situation from our actions. When will we hear about that??
Brit..Dems trying to rewrite history..Bush has done a terrible job of refuting their message..Juan is excusing the dems because it was after 911 and they had to support the President in going to war.
.Brit said they on their own the dems stood up and said they believed the same thing the President did.
Mara says the UN emphasis on WMD is what is the compelling reason given ..even though as Brit pointed out..it was among a litany of reasons the Congressional resolution named. Predicts the dems will ride this "Bush lied" train for a while..
The whole world and the Congress believed Saddam had WMD..Bush did not lie..We had bad intelligence..I am still behind the war as I believe an island in the middle east is important ..one that is not led by dictators, or mullahs.
Kristol is emphatic that the President must refute this dem attack on his integrity and win the war..does not consider the budget as important to fight over .Harder to get backing from elected Republicans with his low ratings..
Juan saying dems can concentrate on their domestic agenda..predicts moderates will go dem in 2006.
Kristol suggests there will be no "shake up" in the WH.
Brit says this last speech shows they recognize a problem.
Brit say people will go their own way if ratings slip..suggests that is what happened on drilling ANWR..vote..Conservative dems bolted and moderate Rep voted against.
Agreed. But, this is the same reaction and response that was used to defend Clinton during his impeachment. They try to ignore the facts and concentrate on intentions.
I do too.
There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.