Posted on 11/09/2005 4:28:47 PM PST by smoothsailing
DANNY OCEAN DEFENDS THE RATHER NETWORK
By Ann Coulter 33 minutes ago
The most cosseted, self-indulgent, worthless people in the universe are worried their suffering has been downgraded. For 50 years Hollywood drama queens have churned out plays, movies, TV shows, books, poems, allegories, museum exhibits, personal testimonials, dioramas, interpretive dances, wood carvings, cave paintings, needlepoint wall hangings and scatological limericks about their victimization at the hands of a brute named Joe McCarthy. Schoolchildren who will learn nothing about George Washington, Thomas Edison or Paul Revere are forced to read chapter and verse about the black night of fascism (BNOF) under McCarthy.
But half a century of myth-making later, one little book comes out and gives the contrary view -- and Hollywood thinks it's Treblinka.
George Clooney, writer and director of the rebuttal, claims he was driven to make the movie "Good Night, and Good Luck" because "a book came out about how great McCarthy was."
Q: Ann Coulter's "Treason"?
GC: Yes.
Needless to say I was shocked to learn that George Clooney can read. Liberals haven't been so shocked by a book since "Uncle Tom's Cabin."
So, apparently, we must revisit the BNOF under McCarthy one more time. (Ethical dilemma: Would you write a book to set the record straight on Joseph McCarthy knowing that it might give rise to yet another lame George Clooney movie?)
Clooney said of his small contribution to the "McCarthyism" industry: "I realized that we had to be incredibly careful with the facts, because if we got any of them wrong, they could say it's all horse****. So I had to double-source every scene."
I don't intend to see his movie because -- except for the McCarthy parts -- it sounds like a snoozefest. (Half the reviewers so far have said "good night" to Clooney, and the other half have said "good luck.") And despite all those "double-sources," in addition to getting the big facts wrong (about America and about the Soviet Union), Clooney got all the little facts wrong, too. I guess he borrowed some of Al Franken's "fact-checkers."
As even liberal reviewers have noted, it was hardly an act of bravery for Edward R. Murrow to attack McCarthy. The New York Times was attacking McCarthy, The New York Post was attacking McCarthy and The Washington Post was attacking McCarthy. Every known news outlet was attacking McCarthy. McCarthy was in a pitched battle for his life, his career and the fate of the nation. Murrow merely jumped on the liberal bandwagon -- and rather late in the game. (You want bravery? Try sitting all the way through "Solaris.")
I gather the movie's two examples of McCarthy's perfidy are the cases of Annie Lee Moss and Milo Radulovich. As described in detail on Pages 62-64 of "Treason," Moss was a proved Communist Party member -- who happened to be working in the Code Room of the Pentagon. It was an act of sheer madness, like, say, putting a member of al-Qaida at the Pentagon today or putting Pat Leahy on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Oh wait ...
Moss put on a big Amos 'n' Andy show for a Senate committee, delighting racist liberals who happily proclaimed Moss too simpleminded to be a communist. Only thanks to McCarthy, who ignored the barrage of calumnies from liberals, Moss was moved to a less sensitive position at the Pentagon.
As for Milo Radulovich, he had absolutely nothing to do with McCarthy. McCarthy never mentioned his name. So maybe liberals have finally found the one liberal in the '50s who was not on the payroll of the Soviet Union. I don't know and I don't care.
Amusingly, Clooney said in an interview that Alger Hiss was "probably" a communist spy. By now, I believe even the Nation magazine has been forced to admit Hiss was more than that. But, Clooney says, the point is McCarthy "was wrong about 99 percent of them."
If McCarthy was "wrong about 99 percent of them," when are we going to get a movie about one of the 99 percent? I might go see that movie.
Clooney reverts to the standard Hollywood talking point, saying: "(M)ore important than that, (McCarthy) was wrong every time he denied people their civil liberties."
Ah yes, the old civil liberties canard. Apparently, the only period worse than the BNOF under McCarthy is the current BNOF under President George Bush. This was followed by the usual number of specific examples of civil liberties that had been denied: zero. Liberals churn out hysterical slander daily, but insist on acting like they are the ones under attack.
The only people being tortured are those of us forced to endure the egos of Hollywood fantasists who profess left-wing views to prove they are deep thinkers. Come to think of it, the current BNOF is a lot like the original BNOF under McCarthy.
Copyright © 2005 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Love it
Very true. And for his campaign against Helen Whats-her-name in California.
Howdy Ron Dog. Those Venona papers were mighty inconvenient facts for those pesky commie-symps.
http://www.rinfret.com/venona.html
I've never heard that before.Even if you've never heard it before, it's in the first paragraph of her column.
The tactics of the liberal-left have not changed perceptibly since the days of Joe McCarthy, either.
There is a simple litmus test for the liberal-left - those of you who are not socialist, must by elimination be some sort of "fascist". As if those were the only two choices for human behavior.
Liberalism is a disease. Not incurable, but certainly pernicious and a virtual pandemic.
the subject is "their/them" ... "their" countires, "their" leaders, and "them" and the objects are "countries" and "leaders"
Chicks? Ann just needs a little more cushin' for ...well, you know.
After reading your tagline, which says:
"If you're lurking here from DU (Democrats unglued), I trust this post will make you sick."
I have to say there are many at DU that would wholeheartedly agree and laugh with glee at your statement above. Are you sure you're on the right forum hillbilly?
"their" is an adjective. The subjects are countries and leaders. If you substituted the word "capture" insted of "kill", then the statement would make sense. But you can not convert someone after you have killed them.
GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK.
Domestic Total as of Nov. 8, 2005: $11,444,124
Distributor: Warner Independent Release Date: October 7, 2005
Running Time: 1 hrs. 30 min. Production Budget: $7 million
MPAA Rating: PG Est. Marketing Costs: N/A
I have heard that.
Thanks for your 18 years in the U.S. Navy.
ROFLOL!!!
Couldn't have said it better myself! :)
Unfortunately there will not be much of an audience for that bit of humor since this thread is pretty much down to you and me. However, I appreciate your appreciation.
I prefer brunettes with skinny legs, so Coulter get's a pass.
And since I started the thread I'm probably having more fun with it than anybody else!(except maybe you-LOL)
BTW, Kill Devil Hills is nice.We usually stay with friends in Duck when we get to the Outer Banks.
Is Kathleen Kennedy Townsend going to come out in support of her God Father?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.