Skip to comments.
Now We’re Getting Somewhere (San Fran gun ban)
NRO ^
| November 09, 2005
| John R. Lott Jr.
Posted on 11/09/2005 1:00:10 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Rio
CA has a provision in state law that trumps the locals. IL does not. DC does not.
21
posted on
11/09/2005 1:27:07 PM PST
by
CTOCS
(This space left intentionally blank...)
To: neverdem
When we moved out of our rental home in the Sunset District 10 years ago we were replaced by a lesbian couple. That neighborhood was, in the day, a bastion of the Irish working folk. Although still mostly Dem it was mostly Reagan Dem with GOP mixed in well. Today, it is a mix of Chinese, gays who could not afford Noe Valley, and "Sex and the City" crowd (e.g. decadent, nihilist professional chronic singles) overflow.
22
posted on
11/09/2005 1:29:55 PM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: Disambiguator
Okay, my bad. I just knew Mr. Lott has written re gun crime and taking away guns being safe as liberal mumbojumbo.
23
posted on
11/09/2005 1:30:09 PM PST
by
RetiredArmy
(I have no faith in any politician or political party any more. They all lie for their agendas.)
To: hsalaw
Just like he did trying to be a bootlicker (or, *something* licker!) of the "Castro boys" with his illegal gay marriage fiasco.
24
posted on
11/09/2005 1:31:18 PM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: RetiredArmy
"John Lott is not newly converted. You should read his other works re guns." I was talking about BOR and I really just don't like Bill O'Reilly. I'm glad he finally gets it, but why does it take a Katrina event for him or anyone else to see something so obvious as our right to own guns? Such a conversion strikes me as being very fickle and I can easily see him switching to an anti-gun stance when some other event happens.
25
posted on
11/09/2005 1:33:06 PM PST
by
GBA
To: neverdem
This part of the story is more interesting:
"Opponents, who include local law enforcement unions and gun owners, say a ban on handguns would lead to a rise in crime because criminals would know people are not armed and able to defend themselves.
"Those who are committing violence on the street don't use legally obtained guns anyway," said Larry Barsetti, a retired San Francisco police lieutenant. "
26
posted on
11/09/2005 1:35:18 PM PST
by
trashcanbred
(Anti-social and anti-socialist)
To: neverdem
Let the San Francisco riots begin! Maybe those left will vote differently next time.
Also, I wonder if any president would have the guts to not send in the US military to help after the big one on the basis that they don't want the military to even be able to exercise their first amendment rights and recruit volunteers.
27
posted on
11/09/2005 1:36:22 PM PST
by
S.O.L.
To: neverdem
Great. Now only police will have guns, we all know that they know best how to use them.
Especially lady cops
28
posted on
11/09/2005 1:36:46 PM PST
by
Bon mots
To: TeenagedConservative
He seems to be losing his mind over the oil industry turning a profit as well. LOL! I almost busted a gut laughing last night when he had Wayne Rogers and Ben Stein on..poor Mr. Rogers looked like he wanted to hang himself and Ben Stein kept trying to get a word in edgewise..sir..sir..sir..all the while Bill Blathered and bloviated about another thing he knows nothing about..
What a fool Bill O'Reilly is..does he research anything?
To: camle
let all the armed thugs gravitate thereto for the safe pursuit of their chosen career paths. Why not? All the bums do.
30
posted on
11/09/2005 1:43:54 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: GBA
I was talking about BOR and I really just don't like Bill O'Reilly. I'm glad he finally gets it, but why does it take a Katrina event for him or anyone else to see something so obvious as our right to own guns? Such a conversion strikes me as being very fickle and I can easily see him switching to an anti-gun stance when some other event happens.Many people have no direct experience with the positive effects of gun ownership. O'Reilly is obviously one of those; He has at least had the courage to admit his prior position was wrong.
A smart person learns from his mistakes, a really smart person learns from other peoples mistakes.
To: Bon mots
>>Especially lady cops
Wow, what a screwup! :) Did she hit the suspect or the guy handcuffing him?
32
posted on
11/09/2005 1:45:21 PM PST
by
MarineBrat
(When it rains, New Orleans makes its own gravy.)
To: neverdem
Australia's government confiscated guns and home invasion went up over 40%. Florida issued 120,000 concealed carry permits and carjacking went way down. Who will the liberals blame when crime skyrockets and many are killed. Law abiding people will follow the law and criminals and gang members will still kill!
33
posted on
11/09/2005 1:47:22 PM PST
by
mountainlyons
(Still angry after all these years!)
To: BRITinUSA
True. But when he switches back to his previous position, he will be able to cite your words as proof of his growth. Time will tell, I guess, but I still don't like him.
34
posted on
11/09/2005 1:47:58 PM PST
by
GBA
To: George Smiley
Al Franken and Bill O'Reilly are mirror images of each other: pompous windbags with acutely excessive senses of self-importance That is untrue and unfair.
Al Franken is an uneducated, third rate, stand up comedian. And he acts like one
While you may not agree with Mr. Orielly, he is a very well educated professor, who also happens to have a very conservative bent. - and that is quite rare, even if we do not always agree with him
I know I don't, and a few times he outright ticked me off, but I never lost sight of the fact that he is extremely intelligent, unlike Franken, who is a rather stupid buffoon
35
posted on
11/09/2005 1:48:53 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: mountainlyons
I'm one of those Florida residents, and a little while ago they were saying that our castle doctrine (expansion) would lead to outright mayhem on the streets, as we all shot it out any time that we were pissed.
Uh, no. - But we are safer.
36
posted on
11/09/2005 1:51:36 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: bill1952
None of the descriptive language I used made any reference whatsoever to the intelligence or lack thereof on the part of either Mr. Franken or Mr. O'Reilly.
That having been said, I stand by my comments.
37
posted on
11/09/2005 1:59:36 PM PST
by
George Smiley
(This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
To: MarineBrat
I don't know. I think I read that the cow hit the suspect in the arm. Bet that left a mark.
38
posted on
11/09/2005 2:00:13 PM PST
by
Bon mots
To: trashcanbred
The SF PD was opposed because they are not exempt from the requirements of this stupid law, i.e., they are not permitted to keep a gun in their homes or when off duty. Retired cops are also required to give up their home defense guns. The biggest part of this law is that it requires that people not keep guns in their homes - a confiscation is possible - should the morons on the SF Board of Stupidvisors so deem.
39
posted on
11/09/2005 2:07:58 PM PST
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The story was in the San Francisco Chronicle. It was also posted on SFGate.com yesterday or the day before.
40
posted on
11/09/2005 2:11:03 PM PST
by
SFC Chromey
(We are at war with Islamofascism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson