Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patrick Fitzgerald Ignored Witnesses Who Contradicted Wilson
NewsMax ^ | 11/9/05

Posted on 11/09/2005 9:07:53 AM PST by areafiftyone

Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's Leakgate investigation is coming unraveled, as witness after witness steps forward to challenge a key premise of his controversial probe.

Was the identity of Joseph Wilson's wife Valerie Plame really a deep dark secret before she was "outed" by columnist Robert Novak in July 2003?

The number of witnesses now saying "No" has climbed to four - and none of them have apparently been interviewed by Fitzgerald's investigators.

On Wednesday, Wayne Simmons, a 27-year veteran at the CIA, told Fox News Radio: "As most people now know, [Plame] was traipsed all over Washington many years ago by Joe Wilson and introduced at embassies and other parties as 'my CIA wife.'

Last week, Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely told WABC Radio's John Batchelor that during a 2002 conversation with Wilson while the two waited to appear on a TV show, Wilson casually mentioned that his wife worked at "the Agency." In Oct. 2003, NBC's diplomatic correspondent, Andrea Mitchell, told CNBC that Plame's occupation "was widely known among those of us who cover the intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger."

Mitchell added: "So a number of us began to pick up on that."

And in Sept. 2003, NationalReviewOnline's Cliff May wrote that when Plame's CIA connection was mentioned in Novak's column - "That wasn't news to me."

"I had been told that [Plame was CIA] - but not by anyone working in the White House. Rather, I learned it from someone who formerly worked in the government and he mentioned it in an offhand manner, leading me to infer it was something that insiders were well aware of."

The day his report appeared, May told the Fox News Channel's John Gibson: "I knew this, and a lot of other people knew it."

In fact, rumors now swirl around Washington that Plame used to take her friends to lunch at the CIA's cafeteria.

So what has Mr.Fitzgerald - who was hailed as a "prosecutor's prosecutor" only weeks ago - done with the avalanche of testimony that contradicts his stated claim that Plame's job "was not widely known"?

Apparently nothing.

In the six days since he's gone public, Gen. Vallely says prosecutors have yet to contact him.

Ms. Mitchell has been mum since her "widely known" comment resurfaced last week, offering no indication whether Fitzgerald has bothered to check her story out.

If Mr. May has been interrogated, he's also keeping it to himself.

And Mr. Simmons has made no mention of any contact with Fitzgerald's team.

On the other hand, the prosecutor's prosecutor made a big show of interviewing two of the Wilsons neighbors just four days before he announced his indictment of Lewis Libby - in a bid to establish whether Ms. Plame's occupation was indeed secret.

It was, as far as her neighbors were concerned. But the revelation that Fitzgerald had waited till the last minute to confirm such a key aspect of his case raised more than a few eyebrows.

Now, with four witnesses on the record saying they knew what the Wilsons' neighbors didn't - and two of those witnesses coming forward even before the Leakgate investigation began - it's beginning to look like Mr. Fitzgerald deliberately ignored critical testimony that would have compelled him to close up shop well before he ever got to Mr. Libby.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cialeak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: areafiftyone

"These people if they are not interviewed by Fitzgerald they need to go on the MSM Television."
---
Who, other than FOX, would even allow these people into the building?


41 posted on 11/09/2005 9:46:07 AM PST by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cahome

It does seem odd that that Patrick Fitzgerald felt a need NOT to show his occupation.
The address is there, though. I would think easy enough if the prosecutor Fitzgerald has a connection to that address.


42 posted on 11/09/2005 9:49:23 AM PST by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: clee1

Did anyone find the Libby Defense Fund? I guess we could just send money directly to his attorney.


43 posted on 11/09/2005 9:49:48 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ottothedog
It does also go to the charge that Libby lied about where he learned about Wilson's wife. If it is generally known, I don't know how he can prove that Libby didn't learn it from a journalist, or more accurately, prove that Libby didn't believe that he learned it from a journalist at the time he testified that way.

You are right, this is the meat of the case against Libby. Scooter claimed that he learned it from Tim Russert. Russert denied it but it seems now that some of Russert's journalist staff have indicated that they knew of Plame's association with the agency which would lead one to wonder how truthful Russert is being.

This is now a quagmire for Fitzy because if he reverses himself and indicates that Libby may have been truthful, it would mean that Russert pergured himself to the Grand Jury.

Fitzy knows if he indicts Russert, all hell would break loose.
44 posted on 11/09/2005 9:51:13 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Ham & Eggs: A day's work for a hen, A lifetime commitment for a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

pergured = perjured


45 posted on 11/09/2005 9:53:36 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Ham & Eggs: A day's work for a hen, A lifetime commitment for a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: clawrence3
Libby Establishes a Fund to Help Pay Legal Bills
46 posted on 11/09/2005 9:54:19 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: cahome

Patrick Fitzgerald normally resides in Chicago.


47 posted on 11/09/2005 9:56:08 AM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
"My understanding is that, in effect, Libby is now facing a trial for having supposedly lied under oath to cover-up something that is obviously not a crime (as in a violation of the statute of "outing" undercover CIA agents)...?"
---
Yeah.
Libby gave the prosecutor his own notes which ran contrary to his testimony.
Like I've said before, "Plead the fifth as you walk into the courthouse and don't stop till you get to the parking lot."
Nobody in there right mind will ever talk with investigators now.
48 posted on 11/09/2005 9:57:44 AM PST by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fooman

Hey I am just giving the facts not saying I agree with any use of them. Wilson is irrelevent to these charges whether you like it or I like it.

Bush should pardon Libby as far as I am concerned. Fitzgerald was not charged with determining whether Joe Wilson is a liar or not.


49 posted on 11/09/2005 9:58:20 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The plot thickens . . .


50 posted on 11/09/2005 9:58:45 AM PST by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I was wondering what the he was talking about when he made the "Not Widely Known" comment. It doesn't look like it will stand up to scrutiny.


51 posted on 11/09/2005 9:59:27 AM PST by JustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
So what has Mr.Fitzgerald - who was hailed as a "prosecutor's prosecutor" only weeks ago - done with the avalanche of testimony that contradicts his stated claim that Plame's job "was not widely known"?

Why do you think Fitz's people were hurredly interviewing Plame's neighbors at the last minute?

Because in order to make the perjury charge germane to the case, Fitz had to claim that Plame's CIA employment was not widely known. So he cherry-picked some evidence while ignoring or not following up on evidence in the public domain.

Which, IMO, could rise to prosecutorial misconduct.

52 posted on 11/09/2005 9:59:59 AM PST by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

Sounds like the Prison Leak may be Republicans.


53 posted on 11/09/2005 10:00:32 AM PST by JustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

yes he is. this is selective prosecution and it is too bad that freepers like you are distracted by this.


54 posted on 11/09/2005 10:00:53 AM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

yes, but nevertheless - reporters also walked into that GJ and told investigators that they never heard of Wilson's wife before talking to Rove and Libby. it those claims are false, then they also deserved perjury indictments. I agree this has nothing to do specifically with the indictment against Libby, but anyone who believes the reporters all told the complete truth about their prior knowledge - is dreaming.


55 posted on 11/09/2005 10:00:56 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

In Name Only.


56 posted on 11/09/2005 10:01:19 AM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
My understanding is that, in effect, Libby is now facing a trial for having supposedly lied under oath to cover-up something that is obviously not a crime (as in a violation of the statute of "outing" undercover CIA agents)...?

So what am I missing in this puzzle..?


This is what is known as "The Criminalization of Politics" plain and simple.
57 posted on 11/09/2005 10:01:40 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Ham & Eggs: A day's work for a hen, A lifetime commitment for a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

More like he's bucking for the Supreme Court if the Dem's take the Whitehouse.


58 posted on 11/09/2005 10:01:42 AM PST by JustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: maro

exactly.


59 posted on 11/09/2005 10:01:45 AM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

"Bush should pardon Libby as far as I am concerned."
---
Until Libby is convicted of a crime, Bush cannot pardon him.
If necessary, I hope Bush will.


60 posted on 11/09/2005 10:01:52 AM PST by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson