Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP LEADERS TO LAUNCH NEW 'LEAK' PROBE; INFO TO WASH POST 'DAMAGED NATIONAL SECURITY'
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2l.htm ^

Posted on 11/08/2005 8:41:11 AM PST by NYjarcola

GOP LEADERS TO LAUNCH NEW 'LEAK' PROBE; INFO TO WASH POST 'DAMAGED NATIONAL SECURITY' Tue Nov 08 2005 11:36:31 ET

**Exclusive**

Sources tell Drudge that early this afternoon House Speaker Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Frist will announce a bicameral investigation into the leak of classified information to the WASHINGTON POST regarding the “black sites” where high value al Qaeda terrorists are being held and interrogated.

MORE

Said one Hill source: “Talk about a leak that damaged national security! How will we ever get our allies to cooperate if they fear that their people will be targeted by al Qaeda.”

According to sources, the WASHINGTON POST story by Dana Priest (Wednesday November 2), revealed highly classified information that has already done significant damage to US efforts in the War on Terror.

Developing...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: NYjarcola
So, this means Senator Frist is really, really, really mad this time?

How many memos have the Dems leaked that have gotten little attention? [Remember Sen. Rockerfeller's memo? Remember?]

How many other leaks have the Dems made that have gotten little criticism? [Remember Sen. Kerry's outting of an agent a hearing last year?]

What did the Pubbies do about any of the previous ones? Nothing, nada, zilch, zero.

If the GOP leadership does anything more than grandstand and let the issue drop, I'll be surprised. I'd hedge a bet and say that one or more Pubbies would end up resigning or getting fired or being indicted before one Dem would. Because the Dems are innocent victims? No, because the Pubbies will fold before a full investigation is ever finished.
41 posted on 11/08/2005 9:05:37 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
Hmmmm. Midterms are one year away. A special investigator request will come from the committee, which times the leaks from this special prosecutor's office sometime mid-summer. Libby's trial may be underway by then, with MSM emptyheads under oath in public being cross-examined by someone I know I wouldn't 't want to face.

Should be fascinating.

42 posted on 11/08/2005 9:06:29 AM PST by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rhc2000

Maybe. We'll see. I sure hope so, it's certainly a GOOD first start. Well overdue.


43 posted on 11/08/2005 9:07:15 AM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhc2000

My thoughts exactly. I wonder how long they will remain in place?


44 posted on 11/08/2005 9:08:07 AM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYjarcola

This is going to be very interesting, especially with the precident of jailing reporters, that Fitzgerald set. It almost makes the political prosecution of Libby worth it, as long as he is vindicated in the end, that is.


45 posted on 11/08/2005 9:09:32 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth

You scare me sometimes. ;^)


46 posted on 11/08/2005 9:10:45 AM PST by Samwise (The media is "stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

They must definitely know who the leak came from, or have narrowed it down to several sources. It would be really embarrassing to have an investigation reveal GOP sources leaking this kind of info--though, IMHO, whoever leaked this information should be thrown in jail. This is no Plame-type B.S.--this actually does jeopardize national security.


47 posted on 11/08/2005 9:11:41 AM PST by Deo et Patria (Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth


It looks like meat's back on the menu boys!
48 posted on 11/08/2005 9:12:33 AM PST by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant

49 posted on 11/08/2005 9:12:52 AM PST by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

That works too. As long as we provide Dana with a last ciagarette.


50 posted on 11/08/2005 9:14:03 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pissant

But, but, but........the cigarette could be deadly!


51 posted on 11/08/2005 9:14:44 AM PST by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rhc2000
Just growing them isn't enough. Now they have to figure out what to do with them.

I haven't been all that impressed with what they have come up with for quite a few years now that they have supposedly been the majority party.

52 posted on 11/08/2005 9:16:08 AM PST by ImpBill (Nothing More!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

And the ACLU would sue the state for providing evil tobacco to the condemned.


53 posted on 11/08/2005 9:16:11 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Just a hunch, mind you, but Hassert and Frist leading the charge? They must know what the results would be or they wouldn't be sticking their necks out. Should be interesting.

Ditto, Ditto. Great point. And while we are at it, the press is going to spin this as political retaliation,abuse of power, attack on the freedom of the press blah, blah, blah.

Note to McClellan, when you are asked this question just stare for a minute or two at the questioner and reply, "This is a serious issue, and WP is entitled to print anything they like in their own defense. That is of course not journalism, but self interest. No one should mistake any reporting from them on this issue to be either accurate or valid.

54 posted on 11/08/2005 9:18:30 AM PST by Kay Syrah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NYjarcola
GOP LEADERS TO LAUNCH NEW 'LEAK' PROBE; INFO TO WASH POST 'DAMAGED NATIONAL SECURITY'

It won't be worth the trouble - "Scooter" Libby is already under indictment and Wilson and Plame are still managing to remain under the radar.

/sarcasm
55 posted on 11/08/2005 9:25:35 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhc2000

I certainly hope so but just in case I won't bet the babys diaper money on it.


56 posted on 11/08/2005 9:25:44 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYjarcola

It's "ABOUT TIME!!!


57 posted on 11/08/2005 9:27:45 AM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhc2000

"Republicans finally grew a pair."

I doubt it.


58 posted on 11/08/2005 9:28:02 AM PST by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrNatural
Sources tell Drudge that early this afternoon House Speaker Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Frist will announce a bicameral investigation into the leak of classified information to the WASHINGTON POST regarding the “black sites” where high value al Qaeda terrorists are being held and interrogated.

I don't know what to say. If the government can't plug leaks like this, then the de facto standard will be 'there is no penalty for divulging any level of classified information'.

59 posted on 11/08/2005 9:30:41 AM PST by Steel Wolf (* No sleep till Baghdad! *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYjarcola

Just announced on Fox.


60 posted on 11/08/2005 9:31:42 AM PST by I still care (America is not the problem - it is the solution..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson